this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2024
60 points (98.4% liked)

chapotraphouse

13606 readers
770 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ashinadash@hexbear.net 56 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I am once again encouraging people to use /c/shitreactionariessay on grad. Also, spicy hot poorly concocted take incoming. (This is not directed at OP but more people who hate Rule 8)

The reason rule 8 exists kind of bears itself out to me in shitreactionariessay: no harsh to whoever runs it, but the comm is just a deluge of crap. It's a race to the bottom for whoever can dredge the dumbest and most incoherent takes riddled with slurs on the Steam forums or whatever garbage hole.

Now sure, if Rule 8 didn't exist and thedunktank had this type of thing users could just block the comm, but: what if we just don't have a firehose of garbage as a comm? The dunks are more fun when someone has a quasi-coherent position to dunk into the sun, the dunks are more fun and considered when you can take apart their brainworms instead of just another g*mer yapping or whatever. Low hanging fruit by nobodies on reddit or other places does not make for stimulating posts or replies.

To be very fair, I don't see a lot of utter garbage get removed under Rule 8, this is not to accuse anybody of poor posting. I think it's probably worth it to maintain a high standard of dunk anyway though.

[–] booty@hexbear.net 14 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

s a race to the bottom for whoever can dredge the dumbest and most incoherent takes riddled with slurs on the Steam forums or whatever garbage hole.

Is this what the dunk tank was before rule 8? Is that typically the kind of content removed under rule 8? Or is it just normal dunk tank content which would be allowed if the number next to the text was higher? Be honest.

[–] EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net 32 points 5 months ago (4 children)

Yes, absolutely. Dunk tank content removed under rule 8 (and even before it was formalised) is always some random irrelevant take posted by a nobody with no platform, of which there are literally hundreds of millions on the internet. I think the most notable posting we've ever even had to actually think about whether rule 8 applies is some small time twitch streamer with under 1000 followers who posted something racist on twitter.

The goal of rule 8 is and has always been to limit the absolute dogshit takes that random bluesky accounts nobody's heard of, shitty YouTube commenters, or bad Facebook posts made by some random guy you used to work with 5 years ago.

The intention is to allow for the picking apart of posts made by people with a reasonably large platform or even vague association with the levers of power, without having to wade an endless supply of boring bad takes from nobodies in order to find something worth dunking on.

The rule has been explained multiple times, your disagreement with the rule does not make it unclear.

[–] flan@hexbear.net 15 points 5 months ago (3 children)

We are literally just wasting time by shitposting on the internet. I don't see why we need to have any sort of standards at all. This is just mods being busybodies for the sake of being busybodies.

the_dunk_tank becomes a hell-hole of slop? Great, let the piggies feed. There are like 1000 active users on this site, it'll be fine.

[–] HelltakerHomosexual@hexbear.net 28 points 5 months ago (1 children)

hexbears will critique american's shit taste in movies and then beg for the same kind of worthless slop for their hexbear feeds

[–] ashinadash@hexbear.net 17 points 5 months ago (1 children)

It is not looking good for some of my comrades zelensky-pain also they could literally go to the lemmygrad comm idk

[–] HelltakerHomosexual@hexbear.net 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)

apparently that type of monumental effort just is too much for some

[–] ashinadash@hexbear.net 15 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I can sympathise somewhat with the "only browse local" thing, I browse local 99% of the time, but if a federated instance's comm had something I wanted that wasn't on my instance, I would just... go there, instead of starting a Protracted People's Posting War thinking-about-it idk just spitballing

[–] HelltakerHomosexual@hexbear.net 15 points 5 months ago (1 children)

nah too reasonable a solution, time to post

[–] EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net 24 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The slop trough is open right now at /c/shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml

I encourage you and everyone else disappointed by rule 8 to subscribe there.

[–] Egon@hexbear.net 2 points 5 months ago

Well by that logic we shouldn't have any moderation at all

[–] ashinadash@hexbear.net 12 points 5 months ago

rat-salute Thank u for ur service

[–] booty@hexbear.net 9 points 5 months ago (2 children)

The intention is to allow for the picking apart of posts made by people with a reasonably large platform or even vague association with the levers of power,

Why exactly does posting have to be praxis and how is making fun of an Elon Musk tweet praxis, im begging you to explain this

[–] Moonworm@hexbear.net 18 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

It's not about being praxis; it's about the quality of content.

And it's also about not spending all your time finding every last person who said something that sucks. It's not healthy to do that shit.

[–] booty@hexbear.net 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

Okay, well, that's what it sounds like when the posts have to be about someone "near the levers of power." If it is not about that and is instead about the quality of the posts, I ask once again the question. Why is a picture of an Elon Musk tweet inherently a higher quality post than a picture of a tweet by someone with fewer followers?

[–] HelltakerHomosexual@hexbear.net 17 points 5 months ago (1 children)

because its fucking elon musk, a person people know and have an effect on real world policies and a vast amount of people

vs an actual nobody

you need to stop, you're reaching into the nonsensical in order to argue at this point

[–] booty@hexbear.net 5 points 5 months ago (2 children)

because its fucking elon musk

This is literally not an explanation, you're just repeating the assertion I questioned. I could make just as valid an argument the other way around. Posts of Elon Musk tweets are inherently low quality. Why? Because it's fucking Elon Musk. Also I have an even stronger argument, it's because I can go see Elon Musk tweets any time I want by typing www.twitter.com into my address bar. It is higher effort and higher quality to post things that I would not otherwise have found

[–] nohaybanda@hexbear.net 8 points 5 months ago

Bruh quit it with the Redditor ass debate pervert shit.

[–] Moonworm@hexbear.net 8 points 5 months ago

I find this site generally misanthropic and would prefer that that be confined to public figures at least.

[–] Nakoichi@hexbear.net 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Do you seriously not understand the difference between some 0 follower twitter account and dunking on Elon fucking Musk?

We can just post the low hanging fruit to shitreactionariessay on lemmygrad.

Such a weird hill to die on.

[–] EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net 16 points 5 months ago

Posting isn't praxis, nor does it need to be. You can quit JAQing off and "begging for an explanation" now.

It's pretty clear at this point that no amount of explanation is going to be sufficient for you given the way you've continued to antagonize both moderators and everyone else who has tried to clarify the situation to you in this and previous threads.

[–] HelluvaBottomCarter@hexbear.net 5 points 5 months ago

Didn't there used to be a rule in dunk tank require OP to provide a well-thought explanation? What happened to that? That would improve quality.

[–] ashinadash@hexbear.net 15 points 5 months ago (1 children)

No but it's what shitreactionariessay seems to be. I acknowledge that here:

shitreactionariessay: no harsh to whoever runs it, but the comm is just a deluge of crap.

and here:

To be very fair, I don't see a lot of utter garbage get removed under Rule 8, this is not to accuse anybody of poor posting.

I'm not in love with people asking me questions answered by the comment they're replying to. Kind of silly having to quote Myself, 10 Minutes Ago.

[–] booty@hexbear.net 4 points 5 months ago (2 children)

No

Right, exactly. The questions were not a request for information but a demonstration of the facts so we can be on the same page. The dunk tank has never been garbage like the lemmygrad comm. This is because hexbear users are better posters than lemmygrad users and why I don't want to go use lemmygrad instead of hexbear. If they implemented rule 8 on lemmygrad it would not make the posts better.

[–] ashinadash@hexbear.net 15 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Woah, is that lemmy sectarianism? I wouldn't pass judgement on all lemmygrad users that way.

Anyway here is a useless lawyer who is basically a nobody, here is a nobody bluesky user, here is a bunch of random tumblr replies. Since you seem to demand evidence that rule 8 is required. These are nobodies, not good posts. I happen to think Rule 8 would improve shitreactionariessay dramatically, Rule 8 aside they are the same comm.

[–] Lemmygradwontallowme@hexbear.net 7 points 5 months ago

This is because hexbear users are better posters than lemmygrad users

Quantity of post doesn't make up for quality posts, you ******* ****!

[–] Egon@hexbear.net 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yeah it certainly felt like that's what the dunk tank was.

[–] booty@hexbear.net 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Well, I don't think so and the person I was talking to doesn't think so, so it doesn't seem unreasonable to me to discuss the situation from that perspective.

[–] Egon@hexbear.net 2 points 5 months ago

Well I think so, so it seems reasonable to discuss it from that perspective

[–] Diuretic_Materialism@hexbear.net 2 points 5 months ago

but the comm is just a deluge of crap. It's a race to the bottom for whoever can dredge the dumbest and most incoherent takes riddled with slurs on the Steam forums or whatever garbage hole.

I don't really recall Pre-rule 8 dunk tank being like this at all but I guess that's just me shrug-outta-hecks