No. Those rules have to be learnt the hard way.
It's hard and change all the time, but it would be DS9, TNG, LD, SNW, TOS.
Fake, but even if it was true, the problem would have probably been the age change and not the gender change. Teenage relationships and adult relationships have different rules…
Oh we Europeans are definitively going there. We're just late, as usual.
I don't know why, I find it far easier from my computer. KDE Connect saved my (professional) life.
That's exactly what an IT person would say to hide the fact they watch what I do on my computer!
So how would the judges be appointed under this system and why is it better than having them chosen from the people?
By competition and diploma. A judge is a legal technician. Why elect him on political bases? We do not elect an engineer on political criteria, we take the one who seems the best among the candidates.
If the current system hasn't prevented political influence, then the method of choosing obviously isn't guaranteeing unbiased judges anyway, so what's the point in keeping it as opposed to elected judges?
What's the point to elect them?
Strong and diverse press, strong and enforced rules against politically motivated decisions. A judge should know that, if they don't strictly follow the law, they'll lose their job. This won't make the thing perfect, but far better than officially political judges.
I'm not vegan, but honestly I can understand. As soon as you have an opinion which is not the one of the majority, your posts, even in thematic spaces, are heavily downvoted, and it's tiring. I'm not conservative, I disagree with the posts in c/conservative, buy why would I downvote the things they publish there? A lot of Lemmy members do, however. Same with c/vegan or the religious communities.
Tax the churches indeed.
But a lot of churches aren't the political propaganda arms of the GOP, you just don't hear about 'em.
The meaning was more that Bible scholars are needed. And they have a hard work!