iByteABit

joined 1 year ago
[–] iByteABit@hexbear.net 94 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

We can ban X AND get kicked out of NATO? This is the greatest deal in the history of deals a-little-trolling

[–] iByteABit@hexbear.net 10 points 1 day ago

Who knows what the fuck will be going on in 4 years, shit is looking grim doomer

[–] iByteABit@hexbear.net 15 points 1 day ago

Maoists really silent after this dropped

[–] iByteABit@hexbear.net 49 points 1 day ago (3 children)

No I love our Lemmygrad comrades stalin-heart

[–] iByteABit@hexbear.net 7 points 1 day ago

We have free coffee but the shitty French kind from a machine, still better than nothing though I guess

[–] iByteABit@hexbear.net 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If the lever controls nothing, by which you probably mean elections in which case I totally agree, then doesn't that also mean that the material effects of pulling it don't exist?

This isn't a democracy and capitalists will still do what capital needs after the election. If that is genocide, then genocide it is. Real change cannot happen from within capitalist institutions, it happens by workers organizing.

Even if elections did matter, what exactly have the Democrats done to prove that they aren't willing to do just as much as their counterparts? The "debates" were literally a contest of who is more willing to spend more on the war machine, instead of things like public health and housing, things that the working class really need and care about.

[–] iByteABit@hexbear.net 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This is an important point and the most genuine argument topic between anarchists and communists imo.

The thing to understand here is that a worker state was never really included in the Marxist definition of communism. Marx, Engels, Lenin, all very clearly oppose the existence of the state and believe that the final liberation of humanity will require its long term dissolution. Socialism, as the premature stage of communism, requires a state as a means of establishing the dictatorship of the proletariat against the bourgeoisie.

Being against the state is not incompatible with being a communist, on the contrary it is necessary for socialism to progress and evolve. But it is purely utopian to believe that you can have socialism without a worker state, when classes are still an existing thing. Just look at the past century to see the relentless effort of the bourgeoisie to regain control. Do you really think you have a chance against that without a means of their oppression?

That, I believe, is the major ideological difference we have with anarchists, the rest is purely a result of anticommunist propaganda.

[–] iByteABit@hexbear.net 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Is the "holier than thou attitude" refusing to be Hitler lite?

[–] iByteABit@hexbear.net 36 points 2 days ago (4 children)

This guy's whole existence has to be a bit

[–] iByteABit@hexbear.net 19 points 3 days ago

The only hopium to be found is that some people will finally sober up and realize that no saviour is coming for us and we need to organize and fight if we want to live

[–] iByteABit@hexbear.net 12 points 3 days ago

Ok commies you wanted to vote third party? Now we're gonna stop including women since they obviously can't win an election and it's all your fault angry-hex

[–] iByteABit@hexbear.net 23 points 3 days ago (1 children)

You're way off, they're still whining about hillary-apartment

 
 
 

Translated by Google so it might read in an odd way here and there

 

I'm going to be involved in making a union website, probably just a simple page with some hopefully good looking design. What would be the ideal tools for the job, and any good looking union sites that I can take inspiration from?

 
 

It is a collaborative notes taking app that takes pride in supporting Nazis

 
 

It's not that I want them to betray the people and lay the red carpet for fascism but I'll be pretty smug about it when it inevitably happens

 

How dare North Korea produce things albeit with less quality instead of importing everything and being economically enslaved?

view more: next ›