burrp

joined 1 year ago
[โ€“] burrp@burrp.xyz 6 points 1 year ago

I've tried very hard, but I can't seem to muster any tears for a site tracking company.

[โ€“] burrp@burrp.xyz 35 points 1 year ago (3 children)

What's with the Memmy release notes on the App Store? I think you meant to say, "Various bug fixes and improvements" ๐Ÿ˜œ

[โ€“] burrp@burrp.xyz 11 points 1 year ago

Alternatively, on the left is what the users originally asked for, a double cheeseburger. On the right, representing what is eventually delivered after changes in requirements are incorporated, is a deep dish pizza.

[โ€“] burrp@burrp.xyz 3 points 1 year ago

Correct, anyone who has shell access to the server(s) the instance is running on could query the database.

[โ€“] burrp@burrp.xyz 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

A leaf node is a vector to spam/attack the rest of the network. The network is only as strong as its weakest node.

Edit: i.e. an instance owner with a weak shell password

[โ€“] burrp@burrp.xyz 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Test User screenshot

This is the view an admin has for a user via the existing Lemmy web UI. No email or IP is visible.

The user's data would only be available to someone with direct access to the database.

[โ€“] burrp@burrp.xyz 8 points 1 year ago

You misunderstood. I said the public availability does not grant OpenAI the right to use content improperly. The authors should also sue the party who leaked their works without license.

[โ€“] burrp@burrp.xyz 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'd love to know the source for the works that were allegedly violated. Presuming OpenAI didn't scour zlib/libgen for the books, where on the net were the cleartext copies of their writings stored?

Being stored in cleartext publicly on the net does not grant OpenAI the right to misuse their art, but the authors need to go after the entity that leaked their works.

[โ€“] burrp@burrp.xyz 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How many reviews of their works have been posted online? You don't need the source text.

[โ€“] burrp@burrp.xyz 11 points 1 year ago

Luckett is an unrepentant worm. Chapman is to be commended for calling him out.

[โ€“] burrp@burrp.xyz 30 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Admins paid off? That's absurd. Lemmy.world are taking a moderate wait-and-see approach. I disagree with that stance, but to insinuate they are corrupt because they aren't as reactionary as you are is ridiculous.

view more: next โ€บ