bidenicecream

joined 2 years ago
 

The cops totally shot some of the kids themselves right? Also they made sure their own kids were immediately ushered out and then just sat around and didn't do shit. Also they told people to yell for help, which just made the shooter target those particular ppl right?

Anything come out of this? I haven't been following.

[–] bidenicecream@hexbear.net 2 points 3 weeks ago

[Note - article has spoilers]

Your post title has spoilers! WTF fuck you OP i wanted to go in blind but this post fucked it up for me. Honestly this post should be removed. I'm reporting this.

[–] bidenicecream@hexbear.net 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

Computer hardware has been getting faster and faster for decades at this point, but my computer still slows down. Like WTF. The dumbass programmers take the extra power given to them and squander it instead of optimizing their code. Microsoft word could run pretty well on a windows 98 PC, but the new Word can slow down PCs that are 5-10 years old. Programmers are complete idiots sometimes...

[–] bidenicecream@hexbear.net 38 points 1 year ago

Tankies.

I am very smart very-intelligent

[–] bidenicecream@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

There are still imbalance issues in massive countries like China and India, and the last thing I want is a bunch of frustrated men in a capitalist dystopia (= fascism pretty much). The number I see from a quick search is around 70 million more men than women in India and China (https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2018/world/too-many-men/). They need to figure this shit out quickly. And it can't just be let women from other countries immigrate because then the countries that they left will also have an imbalance. I'm not sure how to deal with this issue.

 

"We should support whatever the enemy opposes and oppose whatever the enemy supports."

https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/mao/works/red-book/quotes.htm

For a better context, see this: https://hexbear.net/comment/3563148

It makes more sense to "support" Putin because this conflict is not happening in a vacuum and its outcome also is important to the conflict between Russia and NATO. Wagner winning would probably represent -- at best -- another 1993 and may in fact be much worse depending on the influence of genuine Nazis. Mutual destruction would also, much more directly, represent another 1993 because it would mean NATO can roll in whether via tanks or corporate stooges and take over.

Third campism is trot bullshit and should not be supported.

Also the comment right below that one:

To be fair, most Western leftists never read Mao so they never understand why Trotskyism will never work in the third world (yes I consider Russia to be a third world resource colony to the neoliberal West).

Mao gave a special place to the (Chinese) Trotskyists and equated them to 汉奸 (lit. Han Traitors, or traitor to the Chinese people), which is probably the worst insult you can ever get from someone like Mao.

The Trotskyists wanted the Chinese communists to do Lenin’s “revolutionary defeatism” by abandoning collaboration with the national bourgeoisie (i.e. the KMT), but instead act on defeating the KMT government right when the Imperial Japanese Army was rampaging through China. According to the Trotskyists, solidarity with the working class of other countries is all that is needed, and they were willing to let the Japanese imperialists conquer the mainland if that could lead to some universal solidarity among the oppressed class.

This is how fascism wins. The Chinese Trots were hated throughout the country and it would take until the 1970s to see a small resurgence among the Hong Kong leftists.

This is why those of us who grew up reading Chinese history just roll our eyes when we see Western leftists calling for “revolutionary defeatism” in Russia because the exact same thing happened to China more than 80 years ago! The defeat of the bourgeois government in Russia means the victory of the fascists and Western imperialists.

Once again, read Mao (start with the Selected Works of Mao Zedong).

[–] bidenicecream@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is super problematic. They are traditionally attractive with European features. This should be taken down because it promotes western beauty standards in a hegemonic way. Even the poc in that picture is portrayed as skinny yet busty and with European facial features. I demand that this be taken down or else I'm going to report you to the mods

(leftist to judgmental-prude-similar-to-conservatives arc).