In no way does that link prove that the state has a monopoly on violence. Are we just pasting random Wikipedia articles and pretending that's an argument now?
Ever heard of the castle doctrine?
That's just one example. Maybe next time you attend libertarian idiot 101 you should do it with a bit of skepticism instead of immediately accepting everything they say without evidence.
They want to read the book so they'll understand the live action play when it happens in real life.
Come on now don't bring up that in one of the "left most" and most populous state in the union that people are actually pretty non leftist, it might contradict some of their feel based arguments.
America is not full of progressives. I don't know why people here can never be convinced otherwise.
Enjoy Trump's tariffs because that is somehow his answer to inflation.
The cycle of political crisis generation and complacency has gone down from 8 years to 4 in the last forty years. People grew complacent over Clinton's two terms and then allowed GWB to happen, same with Obama and Trump, now we're putting Democrats in there to clean up after even worse crises than before, and putting Republicans back there after the last mess isn't even fully cleaned up.
You can be doing two things at once.
Obviously, war aide isn't "for peace" which is what I was saying no to.
But who cares? You got your way nobody wanted to vote for Harris. Enjoy the celebration.
We're fucking idiots is how.
WTF are you even talking about?
Guerrilla resistance could prevent the US military from ever implementing full-on fascism in this country no matter the military, to that much I agree. But you'd need people to give a shit. They really do not seem to.
Neo-liberals (diet conservatives basically) are so busy jerking themselves off about how great they are, forgot why the second amendment exists.
That isn't why the second amendment exists, but you're too busy jerking yourself off about how much better you are than "liberals" to know that.
Not my eyes