I haven't developed anything with #ActivityPub, but have read a little bit of the spec. I would love to hear the take from developers making use of it.
(Sorry for the mention in any case)
@silverpill@mitra.social
@hongminhee@fosstodon.org
@dansup@mastodon.social
@thisismissem@hachyderm.io
No, I kept going back to this one, but thankfully someone (@drcouzelis@lemmy.zip) found it. Thanks nevertheless.
Thank you so much!
Yeah, it sucks. But I think that at a certain point it will need to happen if we want to make ActivityPub better with better portability.
I think there's a FEP that could (or fixes) this. To my understanding ID can be any URI, so there are better ways. I guess it's hard because it would brake a lot of stuff or how mastodon is build.
For a second I thought the ActivityPub specification got updated.
Literally one of the reason for the existence of this thread.
Agree with the article, same idea. Despite the opinions each one of us may have regardless #nostr and #bluesky, they have cool ideas we could borrow.