this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2024
363 points (95.5% liked)

Memes

45745 readers
1516 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
gary_host_laptop@lemmy.ml
sexy_peach@feddit.de
cyclohexane@lemmy.ml
cypherpunks@lemmy.ml
363
But this... does put a smile on my face (lemmy.ml)
submitted 8 months ago by Muehe@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml
25 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Context:

Somebody made a post promoting the proprietary search engine they are working on, claiming in the post that it "would make Stallman smile". In a comment below the post they said that they made the statement about Stallman to "drive engagement". The post was later removed for promoting proprietary software.

Image description:

At the top is a screenshot from the modlog saying:

Removed Post We're building a search engine to compete with DuckDuckGo. No JS, no WASM, no spying. Just a statically generated results page.
reason: Comm rule 2: Don’t promote proprietary software

Below that is an image of Stallman smiling.

top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] superduperenigma@lemmy.world 81 points 8 months ago (2 children)

proprietary search engine

it "would make Stallman smile"

So do they just know absolutely nothing about RMS?

[–] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 9 points 8 months ago

What about Root Mean Square? Are we cleaning signals?

[–] triplenadir@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 8 months ago (1 children)

maybe they're really into creepy sexist jokes and defending paedophiles and they figured RMS would overlook the licensing to support some fellow travelers...

[–] hackerwacker@lemmy.ml -2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Dude is 71 years old and has dedicated his life to establishing and promoting free software. Let it go. The only creep here is you.

[–] pixelscript@lemmy.ml 81 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I replied to that thread.

OP was claiming to be working on a static HTML-serving search engine. They suggested that because it's just HTML and CSS, and that interested parties can use Inspect Element to read the network requests, that it constituted "open source".

Commenters then got on his case about not open sourcing the server backend. OP defended that choice saying they didn't want a competitor taking their code and building a company off of it that would "drive [them] out of business". Uh-huh. So, proprietary software, then. Bye.

[–] mods_are_assholes@lemmy.world 17 points 8 months ago

It's just like when magahats call themselves patriots.

Wrong in every factual way but no amount of you telling them will make them realize it.

That OP was just another silicon digibro with a profit driven mindset.

[–] msherburn33@lemmy.ml 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Technically they are correct. None of the Open Source licenses really regulate what happens on the server. When it's not you running the binary, all the licenses are basically useless. AGPL is one of the few that address this a little bit, but even there you only get the source code itself, when the value in most online services is in the databases and backend stuff that you still don't get to access with AGPL.

The Free Software world hasn't figured out what to do with services running on computers you don't own. GDPR is so far the only thing does something about the server side, but that's EU law, not a license you can slap onto your software.

[–] 314xel@lemmy.world 60 points 8 months ago

[–] 404@lemmy.zip 39 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Some commenter asked why they were using Brave. I saved it to check out the answer later, because I was curious, but now I'll never know :(

[–] explodicle@local106.com 12 points 8 months ago

Always real answer: they invested in BAT.

[–] fannymcslap@lemmy.world 27 points 8 months ago

Coooooooool my first Lemmy drama!

[–] Gabu@lemmy.ml 27 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

I'm so lost. Every reply but one so far reads like it was written by chatgpt

[–] RealFknNito@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Immediately under your comment is someone talking about toenail chewing and I don't think there's any context that would make that make sense.

[–] billgamesh@lemmy.ml 8 points 8 months ago (1 children)

RMS became a meme once for eating his tonail at a conference

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

Foot skin, actually. I think he was peeling his heel.

[–] half@lemy.lol 1 points 8 months ago

Maybe in certain nsfw communities but c certainly not here lol

[–] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 19 points 8 months ago

So it was too good to be true? One tell is that they wrote: Check out xxx.onion that points to my laptop.

[–] JustUseMint@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

Lmao good one

[–] flop_leash_973@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

This meme does not contain enough toenail chewing.

[–] casual_turtle_stew_enjoyer@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I mean why even when Stract is a thing

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

And that is...? First google result is something for google sheets, second result is a plugin for Chrome to extract data from ads.

[–] casual_turtle_stew_enjoyer@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 months ago

https://github.com/StractOrg/stract

Don't know enough to give a testimony on it. Majority or codebase is FOSS afaik. Sorta passed the sniff test? Free API is nice and works well, that's enough for my purposes.

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml -1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

sex pest

[–] AlexS@feddit.de 0 points 8 months ago

Bullshit