this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2024
295 points (99.0% liked)

politics

19144 readers
3581 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] watson387@sopuli.xyz 100 points 8 months ago (2 children)

The fact that anyone thinks this is sane is legitimately sad...

[–] Cogency@lemmy.world 59 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

They don't want trans people to exist as anything but a porn category, so they treat us as just that, a profanity. It'd be funny because of how pathetic it is, but real people are dying because of this.

[–] watson387@sopuli.xyz 10 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I hear you. Have you read Project 25? They have plans to take it to the extreme if Trump wins.

[–] KreekyBonez@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago

it leads down a pretty dark rabbit whole of general Federalist Society plans for an overtly conservative autocratic regime, and it's terrifyingly plausible if they consolidate enough power and funding. and that's all pretty easy with the support of foreign oligarchs that need the US to be fully involved in its own libertarian implosion, so it can turn a blind eye to international war crimes.

i long for the times when conspiracy theories used to be fun spooky stories about cryptids wandering the wilds, and aliens doing creepy stuff in cornfields to mess with farmers

[–] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago

This is a campaigning bill. The wrote it to create these headlines, to rile up their shit base.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 49 points 8 months ago

Fuck the GOP.

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 39 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I love how the GOP is committing suicide.

[–] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 39 points 8 months ago (1 children)

We like to pretend that but they seem to be going strong. Their base, and there is a lot of them, eat this shit up.

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 12 points 8 months ago (1 children)

We’ll find out in November. 🤢

[–] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago (2 children)

True. But, as of right now, polls have Biden and the dip shit neck and neck pretty much. I know polls aren't' everything but....yeah. Thats still scary.

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 18 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I’m pretty worried. If he wins, I doubt there will ever be another election until the government is overthrown, which could take decades.

Handmaids tale was not on my list of acceptable dystopian futures.

[–] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

Yep. Not gonna lie, pretty fucking worried too.

[–] KillingAndKindess@lemmy.blahaj.zone -4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Polls mean nothing and should be ignored. The last 3 elections have proven that.

[–] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

The last election had them being pretty close and that's what it was. Remember?

I never said they are perfect, I was very clear about that. But they do give you a general idea.

[–] Badeendje@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

Their base loves this.

[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 36 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Doesn't that go against free speech? The first amendment?

[–] fiercekitten@lemm.ee 35 points 8 months ago

It absolutely does, but the republicans don’t care. They hope the courts won’t strike it down, but even when the courts do strike it down, it’s still a win for republicans in office because their voters love the attempts at violating the human rights and civil rights of anyone who is different from them. Republican voters also remain ignorant of the fact that all these court battles cost money, their tax-payer money.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 30 points 8 months ago (2 children)

You can here the calls now, can't you? "Why don't people want to go into teaching anymore?"

[–] Shirasho@lemmings.world 27 points 8 months ago

Killing education has been a GOP cornerstone for at least a century now. Education teaches people to think for themselves and make educated decisions, and those types of people would never vote Republican. The GOP are grooming children to vote for them to let them stay in power.

Their politics isn't "support the next generation". It is "how can the next generation support us". Education is the antithesis of this ideal.

[–] bappity@lemmy.world 16 points 8 months ago

I'm honestly surprised that people are still in teaching positions considering the terrible wages and ridiculous amount of work they have to do

[–] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 28 points 8 months ago

The GOP is really full of the worst of humanity and have nothing better to do than do shit like this.

[–] Veedem@lemmy.world 25 points 8 months ago

It's wildly absurd yet entirely on brand for the GOP.

[–] MagicShel@programming.dev 19 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Way to dilute the meaning of being on the list.

[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 19 points 8 months ago

Gotta find some way to hide all the priests that the churches couldn't protect when they got caught preying.

[–] tjhart85@kbin.social 5 points 8 months ago

I would bet that if you investigate the author of the bill enough, you'll find that they have some kind of relationship (friends, relative, money changing hands, etc...) with someone in the list who has a vested interest in it being watered down!

[–] theangryseal@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago

Wooooow.

What a strange time to be alive.

To be fair to our ancestors though, this isn’t new. They just change the target from time to time. Once they do their damage and everyone sees how ugly it is and gets behind the victims of their shit, they just switch targets.

“Well, I got a half black grandbaby, I reckon I’ll stop lynchin’. I’m sorry. You mean I can lynch a gay? Well heck! Yeeeehaw! Git over here fruitcake! Awwww shucks, you mean my grandbaby done growed up to be gay? Well, now I understand, it all makes sense. Can I lynch the trans? Wooooohooooo! Git over here deadname!”

[–] gapbetweenus@feddit.de 7 points 8 months ago

Ok, with trans folks conservatives found a pretty small group to go after, curious what even smaller group would be next.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 6 points 8 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


A newly proposed law in Missouri could charge teachers and counselors with a felony and require them to register as sex offenders if they’re found guilty of supporting transgender students who are socially transitioning.

In an interview with CNN affiliate KY3, Gragg said the goal of the bill is to “put the social learning development of our children back in the hands of the parents.”

During a news conference Thursday, Charles Gragg, Jr., a retired and disabled veteran who lives in Springfield, Missouri, said he was shocked by the bill his younger brother authored and that the measure “took his breath away.”

“We will certainly have conversations with legislators to see what can be done, but also we’ll mobilize our community of LGBTQ+ Missourians and allies to fight back against this because teachers are an incredibly crucial part of our educational system,” Fischer said.

“While this egregious bill is expected to die in committee hearings, it is increasingly alarming to watch extremist state legislators peddle anti-trans hate and continue to introduce discriminatory policies,” Willingham-Jaggers said in a statement to CNN.

Civil rights groups and advocates have blamed a heightened and hostile climate against the LGBTQ+ community for contributing to Benedict’s death.


The original article contains 770 words, the summary contains 195 words. Saved 75%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

The cons are just the worst. They repeat slogans like "pro-life" and "protect the children" - then do everything to cause harm to children.

I wish we could just carve out some Gilead area for them in some cattle country somewhere and let them go form their perfect utopia there and leave the rest of us normal Americans the hell alone. The only downside is that they'd be abusing the hell out of their own kids in that utopia.