this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2023
1096 points (99.5% liked)

News

23259 readers
3431 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

President Joe Biden on Friday ordered a historic change to the Uniform Code of Military Justice by transferring key decision-making authorities outside the military chain of command in cases of sexual assault, domestic violence, child abuse, murder and other serious crimes.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dojan@lemmy.world 147 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It was in the chain of command before? Wow gee I wonder how that could possibly go wrong!

[–] PlantJam@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago

Just to spell it out:

Promotions are based on performance. After a few promotions, you have people that report to you. This means their performance is your performance. So the CoC properly handling rape allegations is against their own self interest.

There's a documentary called the invisible war that covers this topic in excruciating detail.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago

Did I rape my subordinates?

Let me check...

Nope, I found no wrongdoing.

Here that, gang? Now stay in line.

[–] Saneless@lemmy.world 90 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Ahh good. The Catholic Church model of reporting and punishment doesn't work so well

[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I heard Pope Francis was changing that, cause yeaaaah...

Having it reported through Confession which by doctrine cannot be shared or punished, not really working out for anyone.

[–] BadRS@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Works out great for the rapists

[–] mrbubblesort@kbin.social 64 points 1 year ago

oh oh!!! now to the police next please!

[–] Lenins2ndCat@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

Time for the floodgates to open.

[–] Bluehood380@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Till the next repub pres ovrrturns this?

Regardless, hope this sticks.

[–] mayo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Maybe. But all the reversals are politically motivated so depends how much their base will get hard on reversing it. I'm sure there are other juicier targets for them to get through first. Unless it's Trump. Trump seems to be more interested in the appearance of money and power.

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Can someone explain the change to me? I do not understand how it was done before, why that was bad, and how this is different and better. (Things I probably would have included in the article, had I written it)

[–] Chetzemoka@kbin.social 63 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

Historically, these investigations have been handled by the higher-ups in the chain of command. Say one soldier raped another and the victim reported it. Their mutual boss and that boss's bosses would be responsible for any investigation and discipline.

They have the same negative incentive to provide thorough investigation and justice as college campus police do - because in the end it makes them look bad at their jobs and makes the institution that signs their paychecks look bad. So they just don't. Often victims are ignored or worse, disciplined themselves.

This change will provide a third party not involved in the chain of command for reporting and investigation of sexual assault allegations.

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

Ok that definitely gives me some context. Thanks!

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] BCat70@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Adding to @Chetzemoka@kbin.social comment: The military has a peculiar concept for responsibility in command, such that a senior officer or even NCO could have thier career totally ruined for investigating a rape. Not for other crimes, mind you, but some arcane language held that they could be held culpable for not having prevented the attack. Biden has rather firmly corrected that error.

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

Good addendum, I appreciate it!

[–] JTode@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

I gotta say, I had zero expectation of anything from Biden, but he has definitely delivered a few pretty good somethings, and this looks like another one. I hope they have a great day today wherever the Bidens are hanging out.

[–] mayo@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

I need some good news today and this was it. Solid work. And quick too.

[–] Blamemeta@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Kinda surprised it took this long.

I've heard it said that women in the military get assaulted so often they're basically the state's own unwilling prostitutes.

[–] Nacktmull@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

If this only affects prosecution of crimes inside of the military that is already a great step but what I really wonder about is if it will also affect prosecution of war crimes committed by US military. Could someone elaborate please?

load more comments
view more: next ›