this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2024
66 points (95.8% liked)

politics

19072 readers
4170 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dhork@lemmy.world 40 points 8 months ago

There's a serious National Security threat, all right. It's currently leading the race for the Republican Presidential Nomination.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 33 points 8 months ago (2 children)

A bit more here:

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-congressional-intelligence-chair-warns-serious-national-security-threat-2024-02-14/

Two sources familiar with the issue said Turner's statement was related to Russia and operations in space, without providing further details on what was described as a highly-classified matter.

Maybe they finally found the Moon Nazis from Iron Sky

[–] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

I was hoping for space lasers

[–] 18_24_61_b_17_17_4@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

About time! They've been getting away with it for far too long.

[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 22 points 8 months ago

there's no reason for Americans to panic.

"Professor, without knowing precisely what the danger is, would you say it's time for our viewers to crack each other's heads open... and feast on the goo inside?"

"Yes, I would, Kent."

[–] LopensLeftArm@sh.itjust.works 18 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Republican fear-mongering has now devolved to, "Something, somewhere will happen, and it'll be very bad. I will not be elaborating or taking any questions."

[–] Deceptichum@kbin.social 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Buddy, this is Republicans fear mongering about Russia. That makes it more alarming considering how much they love them.

Four sources with knowledge of the issue told NBC News that the threat is a Russian military capability

[…]

Turner recently returned from a congressional delegation trip to Ukraine and said Friday that lawmakers “all have access to the intelligence as to the risk that is faced not only to the United States, our allies, but the world as a result of Russia’s aggression against Ukraine.”

We will find out soon at the meeting hopefully, but he cant just go around releasing intelligence information on his own. But take this seriously if even a Republican is worried.

[–] NegativeLookBehind@kbin.social 15 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Oh, I know what the threat to America is! It’s everybody with an R next to their name in our government. They say that the R stands for republican, but it really means Russian.

[–] aew360@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Uhhhm, the article was mostly Republican congressmen urging the President to declassify the briefings and they all said the threat originates from Russia. So this is one of those rare times where Republicans seem to be genuine in their concern

[–] djsoren19@yiffit.net 6 points 8 months ago

Never, ever, ever assume a Republican is being genuine in any way, for any reason, at any time, especially when it is regarding Russia.

One of two things is happening; Putin has either told them what to say in an effort to stir up some nonsense controversy, or he has lied to them about something to make them useful idiots.

[–] NegativeLookBehind@kbin.social 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yeaaaah I’m not buying that shit

[–] aew360@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago

I mean, I don’t blame you xD

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

Or, Putin doesn't know what it is we know about so they call to declassify it all so it can be public

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

Somebody got rattled,. The NSA didn't say there wasn't a problem, yet he did a personal briefing to the gang. Bears watching.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 3 points 8 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


WASHINGTON — House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Turner, R-Ohio, released an unusual statement Wednesday warning of a "serious national security threat" without providing additional details, pre-empting what the White House said was a planned briefing for congressional leaders.

"Today, the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence has made available to all Members of Congress information concerning a serious national security threat," Turner wrote in the statement.

On Wednesday afternoon, House members began trickling in and out of the highly secure room in the basement of the Capitol, known as the SCIF, where the most sensitive, classified information is shared with lawmakers.

Sullivan said that earlier this week, he reached out to the Gang of Eight, the top leaders from the House and Senate, "to offer myself up for a personal briefing."

Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Mark Warner, D-Va., and its ranking member, Marco Rubio, R-Fla., were briefed weeks ago on the national security threat identified by Turner, according to two sources with direct knowledge.

One source with knowledge noted that the threat is “not unrelated” to the issues addressed by the currently stalled national security supplemental funding package, which includes aid for Ukraine Israel and Taiwan, but that they are not “directly tied."


The original article contains 826 words, the summary contains 202 words. Saved 76%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] Alteon@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

With it relating to Russia and there being a new Security threat all of a sudden, I would bet that it's nuclear related, as in there's either been recent activity at a monitored site. The articles said sources described something space related, so if it's suddenly become a concern then they noticed that something has changed, maybe the flight path of a satellite, or something actively changed on one of their satellites? Maybe they e identified something up there as a potential weapon? Lots of unknowns still.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)
[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, why not. This season is getting kind of humdrum. Let's throw some space aliens in.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Hey, that was last year’s conspiracy. You gotta pick a new one.

[–] NegativeLookBehind@kbin.social 7 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Gay Jewish ANTIFA space aliens with lasers

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

I’ll allow it.