this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2024
75 points (98.7% liked)

World News

38563 readers
2555 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Poland, Germany and the Netherlands have signed an agreement on plans to create a “military transport corridor” that would allow troops and equipment to be moved more easily through their territories to bolster NATO’s eastern flank.

They hope the decision will be a step towards creating a broader “military Schengen” zone within Europe that would allow military personnel and equipment to be moved freely just as the existing Schengen area allows free movement of people.

A memorandum of understanding was signed in Brussels yesterday by the three countries on the sidelines of a meeting of European defence ministers.

“We need a military Schengen to move military personnel and materiel more quickly and efficiently,” tweeted Dutch defence minister Kajsa Ollongren. “This will make Europe stronger. We took an important step: Poland, Germany and the Netherlands signed a declaration to achieve a military corridor.”

“Currently, the effectiveness of military mobility is hampered by the different administrative requirements of countries,” noted her Polish counterpart, Władysław Kosiniak-Kamysz. “In light of the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, we know how important it is to move efficiently within the EU.”

“We are taking military mobility to a new level on the road to a true military Schengen,” declared Germany’s parliamentary state secretary for defence, Siemtje Möller, quoted by Polskie Radio.

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FinishingDutch@lemmy.world 14 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Sounds like a good step towards further strengthening the logistics. You definitely can’t fight a proper war or mount a good defence if people and goods are held up by silly bullshit like administrative red tape.

Also a gentle reminder to everyone: if you see troop and equipment movements anywhere, NO YOU DIDN’T. Keep that shit to yourself and off social media.

[–] 50gp@kbin.social 3 points 7 months ago

what, the troops arent supposed to film their tanks and post to vkontakt?

[–] NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

The fucking Germans want to be able to move troops into Poland easier and faster?

I’ve seen this one and the sequel.

[–] mirtuevagnet@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Huge improvement for logistics from overseas NATO to Suwalki gap. Port of Rotterdam (NL) is the largest port in Europe.

Edit: spelling. Thanks

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Suwalki, but yes.

At the same time, with the Baltic states and Finland in NATO now - and Sweden on the cusp of accession - the Suwalki Gap has become much less of a strategic bottleneck for NATO.

[–] Skua@kbin.social 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It's still the shortest route between Kaliningrad and Belarus, though, so it would still be a major objective for both sides if war were to break out.

Oh, for sure, it would be a major battleground area (if for no other reason than Putin would LOVE to paste the “Russia Takes Suwalki Gap” as a headline everywhere - it’d be a wet dream for an old KGB spook like him. All I mean is that even if that does happen, it’s not going to be as catastrophic as it would have been before Finland joined, and it’s definitely not going to be as catastrophic as it would have been before the USSR fell. Now, Kaliningrad has become more of a strategic liability than an asset.

[–] troyunrau@lemmy.ca 3 points 7 months ago

I'm waiting for Medvedev to threaten nukes over this clear provocation.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The EU should just create a military to deal with this. These various ad hoc agreements are shit when having to deal with a real war.

[–] lnxtx@feddit.nl -1 points 7 months ago (2 children)

The EU should just create a military to deal with this. These various ad hoc agreements are shit when having to deal with a real war.

Wasn't the EU (EEC) a peace project?

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 5 points 7 months ago

The initial goal of the European Coal and Steel Community was to bind different countries' wartime economies together to help prevent conflict between those nations. While that happened, there was also a military alliance which all members were a part of.

[–] rammer@sopuli.xyz 5 points 7 months ago

Still is. Just because you want peace, you don't bow down to every dictator that comes along.