this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2024
42 points (100.0% liked)

Movies & TV

22950 readers
206 users here now

Rules for Movies & TV Discussion

  1. Any discussion of Disney properties should contain a (cw: imperialism) tag. If your post isn't tagged appropriately it will be removed.

  2. Anti-Bong Joon-ho trolling will result in an immediate ban from c/movies and submitted to the site administrators for review.

  3. On Star Trek Sunday only posts discussing how we might achieve space communism are permitted. Non-Star Trek related content will be removed and you will be temporarily banned until the following Sunday.

Here's a list of tons of leftist movies.

AVATAR 3

Perverts Guide to Ideology

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AOCapitulator@hexbear.net 25 points 11 months ago

VEGAN SOKKA VEGAN SOKKA

[–] FlakesBongler@hexbear.net 23 points 11 months ago

I fucking love adaptations that miss the entire point of the original

Just go ahead and fuck it all up, Zack Snyder's Watchmen style

[–] autismdragon@hexbear.net 17 points 11 months ago

What the fuck is the point of his relationship with Suki going to be?

The Southern Water Tribe arc loses some of its oomph now too?

What the fuck.

[–] booty@hexbear.net 15 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I mean it wasn't really his entire arc, that was his arc until episode 4 when he got his butt kicked by a bunch of girls and was like "oh wait girls can be serious warriors my bad" and was never sexist again. if they were going to keep this element in they would have had to dwell on it and draw it out a lot more, and just removing it entirely seems like just as valid an approach to me

but anyway, sokka's arc is more about the idea of masculinity in general, and sexism is a small part of the toxic kind of masculinity he has to grow out of in order to become a well-rounded, reliable member of the team

[–] autismdragon@hexbear.net 17 points 11 months ago

I would still say the sexist attitudes are an essential part of Book 1. Also his dynamic with Suki means less without it. And seeing his former attitudes reflected in the guy who wont teach Katara is important too.

I can accept it if he's still sexist but they just make it less cartoonish. But i think he still needs to start his arc as a sexist.

[–] FourteenEyes@hexbear.net 14 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What is the point of these remakes? They're always shittier. Always. Just release a box set of the animation with director commentary if you want to milk it

[–] FlakesBongler@hexbear.net 11 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

This way they can make double money when people flock to the original to see how it compares to the adaptation

It's the New Coke Technique, but entirely deliberate this time

[–] autismdragon@hexbear.net 10 points 11 months ago
[–] zifnab25@hexbear.net 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I mean, he's still very much a Guy Who Wants To Be Like His Dad and a Guy Who Feels Inferior Because He Doesn't Have Wizard Powers.

The sexism was played up for comic relief, as he struggled to compete with his sister and to contribute to the team. But the core of the arc was always a person who felt inferior to his friends and struggled to be seen as an equal.

[–] autismdragon@hexbear.net 11 points 11 months ago

The sexism is pretty important in Book 1. Not just Sokka's but Water Tribe culture in general.

[–] darkmode@hexbear.net 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

do you feel that? the low rumble that shakes your core? it is ten thousand pairs of hands furiously drafting video essays. We can do naught but consoom.