this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2023
623 points (97.8% liked)

linuxmemes

21428 readers
1162 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  •  

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't fork-bomb your computer.

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     
    top 50 comments
    sorted by: hot top controversial new old
    [–] Walop@sopuli.xyz 65 points 1 year ago (1 children)
    [–] gon@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    ill be downloading this image thank you very much

    [–] CarnivorousCouch@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

    You wouldn't download an image

    [–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 58 points 1 year ago

    Mac OS: Cat, Dog, Cow, Panther, Some California park, your uncles house

    [–] ebits21@lemmy.ca 44 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (14 children)

    Everything should be date-based name releases.

    If it’s released April, 2023 it should be 23.04 or similar.

    Other schemes are arbitrary.

    Change my mind.

    [–] FaeDrifter@midwest.social 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    How would you differentiate between versions with major api breaks?

    [–] bjornsno@lemm.ee 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    Shhh, they don't know what that means, let them live in bliss

    [–] ebits21@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    Lol. Developers just need to know what date the api changed. Viola.

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    Semantic versioning. If I have 1.0.0 and you release 1.1.0 I can be pretty confident it's safe to update. If you release 2.0.0 I need to read the release notes and see what broke.

    If I have version July2023 and you release August2023 I have no information about if it's safe to update. That's terrible. That's really bad.

    This is for dependency management and maybe apis more than OSs, but in general semantic versioning is a very good system. It should be used often.

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 year ago

    They both serve different purposes

    KDE Plasma does its versioning to follow QT versioning, which does its versioning in that way to signify API breaks.

    But for something else like, say, the Linux kernel, which does not break compatibility in that manner, date-based would make more sense.

    [–] Araozu@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    Marketing version (23.04 or just 23) and semver (3.11.3)

    Change my mind

    load more comments (1 replies)
    load more comments (10 replies)
    [–] lontong@kbin.social 43 points 1 year ago
    [–] d_k_bo@feddit.de 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

    I'll likely call it 6.0 since I'm starting to worry about getting confused by big numbers again.

    ~ Linus Torvalds

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] Dnn@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago (12 children)
    [–] Hildegarde@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

    NT was a parallel line of "professional" windows. It had a different kernel or something. There were equivalent versions to most of the home releases.

    The first release was NT 3.1, to match version numbers with the home OS.

    NT 4 was the professional version of win 95/98.

    In the year 2000 Microsoft released both Windows ME, and Windows 2000. ME for the home, 2000 was the NT release for the workplace.

    The products were merged with windows XP, now all windows is windows NT.

    The version numbering makes sense if you count by the NT version numbers. 2000/ME is version 5, therefore XP is 6, and if you pretend Vista never existed (as you should for your own sanity) you get to windows 7 and it all starts to make sense.

    load more comments (11 replies)
    [–] LaggyKar@programming.dev 24 points 1 year ago (12 children)

    And there is OpenSUSE: 10 11 12 13 42 15

    load more comments (12 replies)
    [–] ice2194@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Because in the end a "version number" is just part of the name. You can call it anything you want.

    [–] joyjoy@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)
    [–] ice2194@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

    Minebanan: now with more banan

    [–] voidMainVoid@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    That still doesn't explain why you would choose the other two instead of just counting 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 like a sane person.

    load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] const_void@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    Juking the version number was trendy there for a while. It happened to browser versions to. Firefox and Chrome went from like version 10 to 100.

    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] FluffyPotato@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

    Even stranger is the windows 8 and 8.1 part since this is the one and only time a service pack changed the name of the OS.

    [–] amycatgirl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Gnome 40/41/etc is still 3.40/3.41/etc if I remember correctly

    [–] sohrabbehdani@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

    no they just decided to make 4.0 into 40

    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] mindbleach@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    See also the Doom numbering system: Ultimate, 2, 64, Final, 3, (2016), Eternal.

    load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] tram1@programming.dev 9 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    41>10>5

    GNOME is clearly the best

    load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] w2tpmf@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

    Windows 95, 98, me were kernel version 4.0+

    Windows 2000 was kernel 5.0

    XP and Vista were 6.0 and 6.1

    Windows 10 had to be called that because the naming convention used on Windows 95/98 caused someware to see the OS as version 9.x

    load more comments (1 replies)
    [–] eleefece@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

    Also Firefox, please stop

    load more comments
    view more: next ›