this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2024
1233 points (98.4% liked)

Humor

7436 readers
4 users here now

"Laugh-a-Palooza: Unleash Your Inner Chuckle!"

Rules


Read Full Rules Here!


Rule 1: Keep it light-hearted. This community is dedicated to humor and laughter, so let’s keep the tone light and positive.


Rule 2: Respectful Engagement. Keep it civil!


Rule 3: No spamming!


Rule 4: No explicit or NSFW content.


Rule 5: Stay on topic. Keep your posts relevant to humor-related topics.


Rule 6: Moderators Discretion. The moderators retain the right to remove any content, ban users/bots if deemed necessary.


Please report any violation of rules!


Warning: Strict compliance with all the rules is imperative. Failure to read and adhere to them will not be tolerated. Violations may result in immediate removal of your content and a permanent ban from the community.


We retain the discretion to modify the rules as we deem necessary.


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] li10@lemmy.ml 133 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

You know, with Hitler, the more I learn about that guy, the more I don’t care for him.

[–] doingless@lemmy.world 31 points 10 months ago

Well he lost so history remains intact.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 28 points 10 months ago

Idk, I've been flipping through this history book written in 1941 and it says he did a lot of winning so how bad could he be?

[–] original_reader@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago

Isn't it "the less" you care for him?

🫣

I'll show myself out.

[–] kd45@lemm.ee 50 points 10 months ago (3 children)
[–] dditty@lemm.ee 11 points 10 months ago (3 children)

RIP indeed, dude was the funniest comedian to me. I went and watched every possible clip of Norm available online right before he passed. The YouTube channel I'm Not Norm has 'em all

[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

Fuck Youtube, use the Internet Archive instead. Here is the link to watch all the Norm podcasts with NO ADS:

https://archive.org/details/Norm_Macdonald_Live

[–] clearleaf@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

At least now we know it really wasn't Norm.

[–] Nudding@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

I'm not norm is a legend

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 1 points 10 months ago
[–] zxk@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

He shouldn't have had so many cheeseburgers from his restaurant

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 47 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (24 children)

I know I'm taking a joke remark too seriously, but "History is written by the victors" is just plain wrong. More often than not it is, sure, but it's not exclusively, or even overwhelmingly.

History is written by those who write it. This can be the winners or the losers, and there are plenty of examples for both.

E: people crying about this even though it's blatantly true and I've provided plenty of examples in another comment.

Sorry, but people need to stop universally applying and blindly believing Churchill's history is written by the victors quote.

It was a half-cocked throwaway line by a politician, it's not a universal law.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 88 points 10 months ago (2 children)

History is written by the literate.

[–] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 31 points 10 months ago

I can't remember the comedian who was like "This America guy was just a mapmaker and now he's famous."

[–] Assman@sh.itjust.works 15 points 10 months ago (4 children)

History is written by historians

[–] VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf 13 points 10 months ago

Historians are written by genetic material as well as experiences and reactions to both.

[–] BarrelAgedBoredom@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago
[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

And historians work for the victors.

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 9 points 10 months ago

They also sometimes work for the losers such as the Confederacy

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

And for the losers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sagifurius@lemm.ee 21 points 10 months ago (1 children)

"Just plain wrong"......."More often than not" yeah.....

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (5 children)

Those comments aren't contradictory in the slightest.

Read the comment again and stop being deliberately obtuse.

If someone said "food is served hot" then yeah, they're right, most food is. But plenty of food isn't.

E: brand new account with -700 karma. Damn, baited by a blatant troll. Goodbye.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] banneryear1868@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

It's a very idealist Hume-inspired view of history that even makes this distinction. It's taking for granted that history is determined by conflicts between good and bad. This also takes form in phrases like "the right side of history."

or, "what no historical materialism does to a mfer."

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago (4 children)

“History is written by the victors” is just plain wrong

The most published book in the world just so happens to be the religious narrative that justifies the most successful empire-building exercise in world history.

The second most published book in the world is a book of quotations by the founder of the modern incarnation of the most populace (and arguably the most economically successful) nation in world history.

The third most published book (series) in the world is a fantasy about wizards in high school written and distributed by the colonial power that originally mass marketed that first book so aggressively.

it’s not exclusively, or even overwhelmingly

Perhaps "History is published and distributed by the victors" is a more accurate. But it is always worth analyzing the historical narrative you receive through the lens of the people producing and distributing the texts.

Yeah, sure, Howard Zinn and Hunter S. Thompson and Betty Friedan exist. But their works are unlikely to be the ones your Middle School World History teacher is distributing copies of. In fact, given the recent wave of book bans and library scourges happening across the United States, you're even less likely to find a copy of their works today than you would have five or ten years ago.

[–] threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I'm pretty sure I know what the first book is, and I'm pretty sure I've read the third book(s). What is the second?

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Quotes from Chairman Mao

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

You're deliberately misinterpreting my statement as "history is never written by the victors", which isn't what I said. I have another comment with a number of examples that disprove the quote that everyone treats as gospel.

I don't know what your second example is referring to.

And Harry Potter being written by someone who happens to be from a former colonial power is the biggest reach I believe I've seen in my entire life. So good job with that.

Seriously, how is that an example of history being written by the victors? Childrens books are written by the victors, maybe. It's a book about magic school kids, not a writing of history. And it was published by a publishing company, not by the government of colonial-era Britain.

History is not written by the victors. It is written by those who are most able to write history. More often than not this is the victors, but it is far, far from the rule.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I don’t know what your second example is referring to.

Quotes from Chairman Mao, the very apotheosis of a victor writing history.

Seriously, how is that an example of history being written by the victors?

HP is a fantastic glamorization of elementary students growing up during the domestic fascist turn in the wake of WW2. It isn't simply a story about wizard kids, but an allegory describing liberals coming of age during the 60s and 70s. The heroes and villains and side-characters are all fictional re-imaginings of period figures. Had the English come out on the wrong side of the World Wars, you'd likely be reading a similar set of books translated off the German, telling a similar coming-of-age story about growing up in post-war globally dominant Germany as a young wizard coming of age with evil (((monsters))) hiding in the school basement that only a clever and talented Draco Malfoy could grow up to defeat.

History is not written by the victors. It is written by those who are most able to write history.

The folks most able to write history are the ones in the position to conduct research, formulate a narrative, and distribute it most aggressively. Those people are inevitably working on behalf of the most wealthy and influential business and political interests in the region. Aka "the victors".

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Ok. I'll again refer you to where I literally never said victors never write history. Cool, Mao did. Where did I say otherwise? Point this out to me.

Harry Potter isn't an example of the victors writing history. I don't know what you're smoking to have a take like that. It's a kid's book about child wizards standing against dark wizards who want ethnic purity (i.e. a superior race of wizards untainted by non-magic blood).

It's not a historical record or analysis. It's a kid's book series.

What "victors" wrote it? Where's the writing of history? I see you've backed down from your "and it was published by the Colonial-era British government!" take, so at least we're making some progress.

The folks most able to write history are the ones in the position to conduct research, formulate a narrative, and distribute it most aggressively. Those people are inevitably working on behalf of the most wealthy and influential business and political interests in the region.

Yes! Good boy! You're getting it!! Well done ❤️❤️❤️❤️!

It's just like I said all along - history is written by those most able to record it!

Aka "the victors".

You got so close, only to throw out your previous sentences and go back to this baseless take that has loads of counter-examples, some of which I've already stated.

The victors are usually in a better position to write about events, but it's not a rule. Jesus, how is this hard to understand? The world isn't black and white where everything is absolute.

Most of the writings about Genghis Khan and other Mongolian emperors during their golden era comes from Chinese historians. Tell me, were China the victors in their encounters with the Mongols? Because by your logic, they must have been.

[–] Welt@lazysoci.al 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You don't have to die on this hill, dude.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Just pointing out that it's far from the universal law people are blue-in-the-face defending it to be.

[–] Welt@lazysoci.al 1 points 10 months ago

I count two smurfs.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Num10ck@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

maybe instead of 'written' it should be 'taught' or 'indoctrinated'

[–] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 1 points 10 months ago

That is... more correct.

But even then, it's not hard to find counterexamples. The fucktwits of the American South teaching that the Confederation was Good, Actually spring to mind. It wasn't, and they lost hard. Yet the victors (the literal US government) have not managed to retain control over that narrative.

Reality is that "victors" aren't always an overpowering hegemony, "losers" aren't always doomed to genocide, historians and teachers don't always have an incentive to lie about their own history, and how a culture tells its own history is a complicated and highly situational socio-political process.

We should be extremely wary of the many inherent biases/incentives in how we teach history, but that doesn't mean we should dismiss the discipline outright or that democracies aren't capable of self-reflection and of properly teaching past mistakes.

[–] fidodo@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No saying is a universal law, that's not really the point of those phrases. "How history is taught is heavily influenced by those in power" is just not as catchy. I think you're taking it too literally.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

I'm pointing this out to people and they're saying no it's 100% a universal law. I'm aware the quote likely wasn't originally meant that way.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] TheScaryDoor@startrek.website 24 points 10 months ago

Well it is because the bad guys were real jerks!

load more comments
view more: next ›