this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2023
117 points (95.3% liked)

News

23259 readers
3315 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The Russian authorities said on Saturday that a Ukrainian attack on the city of Belgorod had killed at least 18 people and injured more than 110 others, in the deadliest strike against a Russian city since the beginning of the war nearly two years ago.

Russia’s Defense Ministry said in a statement that Ukraine had hit Belgorod — a regional center of around 330,000 residents about 25 miles north of the Ukrainian border — with two missiles and several rockets, adding that the strike was “indiscriminate” and would “not go unpunished.”

The ministry said that most of the rockets had been shot down, but that some debris had fallen on the city. The Ukrainian government has not officially commented on the Belgorod attack, and Russian claims could not be immediately verified.

Archive

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 26 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Fuck russia. Also, I take this with a grain of salt, to say the least. I’d not be surprised at all if this was just a russian fuckup. Fucking idiots.

[–] PizzasDontWearCapes@sh.itjust.works 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

An eye for an eye would see rockets hit Moscow and St Petersburg

[–] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 19 points 10 months ago (2 children)

At the same time, there is no need to commit war crimes and target civilians. I hope the Ukrainian army is keeping their nose clean here.

[–] Relo@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago (1 children)

It was russian air defence that hit their own city. At least that's what I heard and that's also what it looks like.

It's very unlikely that Ukraine suddenly starts targeting civilians.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Heard from where? I'm inclined to believe Ukraine is in the right here, but citing sources matters, especially when there's a propaganda war happening.

[–] Relo@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Can't find the tweet rn. There were analysis on impact angle, type of explosion and distance from impact side to frontline.

Only way Ukraine would be the origin is if they used himars or drones. But those explosions look completely different.

Another tweet said that Ukraine claimed responsibility for attacking military targets in that area. The russian air defence however has trouble With shooting down those small targets with sensors that were designed to fly towards jet planes or ballistic missiles.

[–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I'm really torn on this. Normally, I'd agree with you 100%, but there's a couple special factors at play here.

The first being that Ukraine is punching up, and they don't currently have the firepower to hit the capitol like their capitol has been hit. So that simply isn't an option afaik.

The second is that as a result of 1, the only realistic way for Ukraine to win the war is to convince Russia to surrender. The quickest way to do that is to convince Russian citizens that they need to overthrow the government. I'm generally against violent/aggressive persuasion(like protests that block streets, preventing people from getting to their job/hospital) because they tend to dissuade people from joining the cause. That being said, force might be the only option Ukraine has for making the Russian civilians to do what needs to be done.

Lastly, Russian media has an iron grip on information control. It's not out of the realm of possibility for them to intentionally keep their citizens in the dark about military installations so as to use them as living shields. "You can't shoot our base because it's under a school" type shit

[–] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I agree with you insofar as Ukraine needs to "bring the war home" for Russians. Break the image that Putin keeps the peace inside Russia. I think Ukraine has been doing a good job of that so far with their attacks on Russian soil, without civilian casualties.

[–] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 months ago

Yeah, a large part of my comment is speculation, that's pretty much the only concrete conclusion.

[–] Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

This is the exact same rationale that lead to wanton, willing, and repeated targeting of cities and civilians in WW1 & WW2 by both side’s air power. Nightly firebomb raids that burned whole cities and melted people alive. And it didn’t work either time, until the US deliberately nuked civilians, and promised to keep up the massacres. Victory, at what cost?

Dresden. Tokyo. Nagasaki. Hiroshima.

That’s the end game of that logic - “bro we just need to be more brutal and inhumane, and then the 5th column will rise up and win the war for us” How many murdered civilians are worth peace?

[–] IvanOverdrive@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

An attack on a residential area? Sounds more like a Russian false flag attack. Wouldn't be the first time.

[–] Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee -3 points 10 months ago

Ukraine has been all but confirming their continued drone attacks against Moscow for months now. They don’t bring any/big body counts normally, but it’s still a deliberate attack on civilians and infrastructure. Ie a war crime.

Calling out Russia for targeting civilians and infrastructure is correct. That’s why Putin has an ICC arrest warrant active, for ordering war crimes. If this attack is indeed Ukraine’s doing its a big problem, nor a good strategic use of Ukraine’s limited military resources.