this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2023
559 points (97.6% liked)

News

23376 readers
2012 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] KoalaUnknown@lemmy.world 258 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Maybe because it’s the only way many without generational wealth can afford to live.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Gazumi@lemmy.world 146 points 11 months ago (1 children)

By choosing, I think we mean that it's not an affordable luxury to do otherwise

[–] vivadanang@lemm.ee 25 points 11 months ago (1 children)

oh trust me, the right wing would LOVE to take your ability to choose to procreate out of your hands completely. Abortion for sure, but also the the night after pill and even birth control. https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2023/04/birth-control-is-next-republicans-abortion.html

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 135 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Honestly at this point there are only a handful of headlines that cover about 90% of news stories:
-Young people 'choose' lifestyle choice that was forced upon them by external conditions.
-Young people are 'killing industry' that they are not paid enough to even dream of participating in.
-Rich person/people found guilty of or admitted to enormous crime will go unpunished.
-Someones totally unqualified opinion on a subject that we're reporting as news because they're rich.
-World ending, shareholders rejoice.

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 17 points 11 months ago

Rich people doing stupid things with money because they aren’t being taxed like they should so that the economy actually can survive.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 124 points 11 months ago (2 children)

"Why aren't the poors having more workers??" - the same people continually reducing the status and security of the working class

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 103 points 11 months ago (8 children)

Choosing or forced to choose?

[–] Bbbbbbbbbbb@lemmy.world 84 points 11 months ago (5 children)

Choosing to not have children is becoming more and more accepted among younger people for a long variety of reasons, among them being climate and economy as well as "not going to ruin my body" and "well i just dont like children"

[–] JDubbleu@programming.dev 44 points 11 months ago (2 children)

You pretty much nailed the entire reason for most of my friends and myself (mid to late 20s). We can all afford kids, but it's just not something anyone desires except for one or two people in our group of 14.

Most of us don't even dislike kids, but the thought of having our own is undesirable.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 29 points 11 months ago (6 children)

I struggle to understand how people can get over how terrifying and unpleasant having children is. Kids can be okay, except when they aren't, and that's often.

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 22 points 11 months ago (8 children)

That is simply not true. Kids can teach you many things about yourself that you never knew you cared about. They open a part of this life you would never see otherwise. They are this thing that loves you no matter what and if you are a good parent you do not take that for granted and give it all you got.

I didn't want any for many years for all the same reasons as many here. And it changed. And it's great, for me. But if you choose not to or have doubts, don't. It's horrible for the kid.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] theblueredditrefugee@lemmy.dbzer0.com 93 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] vivadanang@lemm.ee 63 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)
  • low wages
  • no unions
  • housing is either a lifetime's savings for down payment on mortgage or a never ending escalator of rent fees
  • states taking reproductive rights away
  • states threatening contraception
  • climate change dooming the future
  • war - war in ukraine, war in palestine, war in africa, civil war being threatened by the chud down the street

Gee Mr Wizard, why don't millennials want babies instead of avocado toast?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 69 points 11 months ago (5 children)

No one should have a child unless they are willing to commit themselves to that child 100%. I have a daughter. She's the most wonderful thing that ever happened to me. And if anyone willingly took substantially less effort than I've taken to try to raise her in a safe, healthy environment and prepare her for her future as best I can- fuck you, you should have worn a fucking condom.

No child deserves to be neglected.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] JonsJava@lemmy.world 64 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I make ~$200K a year. As a father of 5, I wish I had not had a single one. I love them, but the stress of taking care of them coupled with the future of the planet makes me regret life choices.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 54 points 11 months ago (9 children)

I find it interesting that you cite the stress of raising them as a factor in your regret. Could you not tell that was going to be an issue around the time number three came around? That's not intended to be accusatory btw. I'm genuinely curious.

[–] JonsJava@lemmy.world 87 points 11 months ago (3 children)

You incorrectly assume I'm intelligent.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 22 points 11 months ago

Haha fair enough

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 60 points 11 months ago (1 children)

they arent choosing it.

They are being forced into it because its the only fucking way to have a chance at NOT being homeless and crippled.

[–] TK420@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago

Oh no, make no mistake, I chose it.

However, even if I wanted them, how the fuck does one even afford them?

[–] Treczoks@lemm.ee 57 points 11 months ago

What choice do they have if kids are basically unaffordable?

[–] M500@lemmy.ml 55 points 11 months ago (11 children)

My wife finally are in a point where we can afford to have children, but we are kinda getting a bit old to have children. So we are also choosing the dual income no children life style,

But a big part of that is our age and how long it took to get to a comfortable place financially.

Now we want to focus on saving for a house and retirement.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Szymon@lemmy.ca 53 points 11 months ago (5 children)

Gee, it's almost like it's important for the long term success of society to have systems in place that make sure it's not a burden to create new people to take over for your generation after their bodies are too old and broken to keep working and society functioning.

Then again, the decisions have already been made by the people with the power to make them, and technology/automation are in line to replace workers. They'll be a little loud and problematic until the numbers naturally even themselves out, but we'll be left with an enlightened society of capitalist asset owners being supported by a massive technological network.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 52 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

"choosing".

Articles like this are not for you and me. These are written for investors.

[–] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 41 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The plebs aren't breeding enough future workers for us to exploit to deliver the promised renumerations to our shareholders.

We MUST find out the reason why! No it can't possibly be that extracting all the wealth into our dragon hoards, I mean, hedge funds is the reason why they're too broke to support children.

It can only be a LiFeStYlE cHoICe! Like being homeless or poor.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 48 points 11 months ago

Friend of mine wanted kids. Can't afford it. Both her and her partner work full time, though money was too tight for them to feel comfortable. It's heartbreaking, really.

[–] TheDeepState@lemmy.world 47 points 11 months ago (3 children)

The world needs fewer people.

[–] ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world 58 points 11 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.world 43 points 11 months ago (7 children)

Less of a choice and more of a survival tactic. Plus, my foregone children would thank me.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] AndaliteBandit@lemmy.world 39 points 11 months ago (6 children)

Im a DINK! Just this year we bought a house, vacationed in Europe and are installing a new heat pump system. I interact with my friends kids and have nieces and nephews. I get to be the fun one and if someone poops or gets sick I can return them. It's like skipping right to the grandparent stage. I don't hate kids or look down on parents like some child free communities but I don't envy them at all. I totally get why DINKness is on the rise. Hopefully the stigma reduces as it become more common.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 38 points 11 months ago (3 children)

What could rasing a child cost? 10$?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 34 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Why the fuck would I want to subject my own children to the inevitability of human suffering? I'm not going to make the same mistake my parents made.

If the world collapses because there are no more children, I'll consider it my greatest accomplishment before ending it all on my own terms.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 26 points 11 months ago (6 children)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 26 points 11 months ago (2 children)

“When we advise clients about having children, we honestly don’t even give them the full real details and the real numbers,” said Shannon McLay, founder of The Financial Gym. “It’s one of those things if you see the math of it all, it might make you decide to not have children.”

what a whole generation of pulling the ladder up behind you will do to a society. Party of family values doing everything they possibly can to destroy familes.

[–] Ultraviolet@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago

In other words, "we trick our clients who paid us for financial advice into having children they can't afford".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Syo@kbin.social 25 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

This is similar to the "correlation doesn't equal causation" fallacy.

Dual income and no kids, is due to the prospect of cost of living and raising a family out pacing income. Housing, vehicle, child care, tuition, are all the items pricing middle class out of options.

DINK is not a choice, if anything, it's more the result of not having the luxury to choose.

[–] Bbbbbbbbbbb@lemmy.world 27 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Nah dude, not having children is definitely a choice and is becoming more and more common

[–] Alto@kbin.social 32 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

I think there's a very solid argument to be made that far fewer would be making that choice if the future didn't look bleak as hell. I would at least consider having kids if I thought there was a better than not chance that the world I leave them will be better than the one I was given.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Pretzilla@lemmy.world 21 points 11 months ago

Bummer when my friends now don't have kids. It robs me of the schadenfreude while they enjoy their childfree blissful and carefree lives.

[–] AgentGrimstone@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago

We're completely happy being uncle and auntie

[–] ApeNo1@lemm.ee 17 points 11 months ago (8 children)

As the 21st century began, human evolution was at a turning point.

Natural selection, the process by which the strongest, the smartest

the fastest reproduced in greater numbers than the rest,

a process which had once favoured the noblest traits of man,

now began to favour different traits.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›