this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2023
2 points (100.0% liked)

memes

22669 readers
522 users here now

dank memes

Rules:

  1. All posts must be memes and follow a general meme setup.

  2. No unedited webcomics.

  3. Someone saying something funny or cringe on twitter/tumblr/reddit/etc. is not a meme. Post that stuff in !the_dunk_tank@www.hexbear.net, it's a great comm.

  4. Va*sh posting is haram and will be removed.

  5. Follow the code of conduct.

  6. Tag OC at the end of your title and we'll probably pin it for a while if we see it.

  7. Recent reposts might be removed.

  8. Tagging OC with the hexbear watermark is praxis.

  9. No anti-natalism memes. See: Eco-fascism Primer

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

https://twitter.com/ProjectLiberal/status/1729138596592935207

the video is basically describing supply chains and how complex it is. see: commodity fetishism labor makes everything. markets are not necessary.

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ObamnaSoda@hexbear.net 1 points 9 months ago

Milton Fraudman kelly

[–] StellarTabi@hexbear.net 1 points 9 months ago

When my parents grew up in the USSR they had to make their own pencils from the random piles of lead in the snow on the way to school.

[–] SkingradGuard@hexbear.net 1 points 9 months ago

Supply chains so complex! Capitalism is truly amazing! Socialism has no supply chains! porky-point

[–] TrudeauCastroson@hexbear.net 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I was first exposed to the pencil thing, then I heard Marx's critique of commodity fetishism and realized how much of economics is just blow-hards.

Adam Smith already wrote about the division of labour in the production of iron pins, it's retreading the same ground but going "isn't it great that we're outsourcing to so many different places that it makes it harder to organize labour"

The pencil thing is retreading something from hundreds of years earlier and ignoring critique since then.

[–] emizeko@hexbear.net 1 points 9 months ago

It is so frustrating to argue with libs who make arguments so old that literally Marx himself responded to them. I get the impression that Marxists already won the debate back in the 19th century and the liberal tactic has just been to pretend the debate has never happened, to continue repeating centuries-old arguments over and over again as if they've never been responded to, and to discourage anyone from looking into Marxism or reading Marx, Lenin, Mao, etc.

by aimixin