this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2023
472 points (95.0% liked)

World News

38979 readers
2903 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] theinspectorst@kbin.social 64 points 1 year ago (2 children)

He's not tracking Elon's jet. The activity of Elon's jet is already public information. All he's doing is republishing it on a widely used platform.

[–] Sarcastik@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Try explaining that to Elon, "the world's smartest man"

[–] zeppo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

The ridiculous thing about his claim of 'doxxing' and 'assassination coordinates' is yeah, it's all public on the FAA website, and anyone who was trying to stalk him or whatever would just look there. The tracking Twitter account was basically just niche celebrity news.

[–] OtakuAltair@lemm.ee 56 points 1 year ago

They've also been on Mastodon (@elonjet@mastodon.social) for about 8 months with 66k followers already

[–] MiscreantMouse@kbin.social 38 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] starlinguk@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Yes, not sure why the Guardian is reporting on this. I'm not even sure Threads is available in Britain.

[–] sarsaparilyptus@lemmy.fmhy.ml 18 points 1 year ago

It's The Guardian, they were probably paid to advertise for Threads

[–] MiscreantMouse@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

Yeah, it mostly seems like a publicity piece for Threads. I think Threads is available in the UK though, but not the EU.

[–] st3ph3n@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

I think it is kinda newsworthy because Elon already threw his toys out of the pram when Threads launched and started eating what was left of Twitter's lunch. That this one guy just reposting the already public data about his jet's movements bothers him so much is delightful.

[–] ech@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Threads is having problems with EU regulation, not the UK.

[–] kaito@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah unfortunately being on Threads doesn't guarantee that the information would be public. I think this news is only relevant to the few who have joined Threads.

[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

I was about to say, Mastodon seems like a much better choice.

[–] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Now why would Elon Musk, self-proclaimed Free Speech Absolutist, have that account suspended?

[–] TassieTosser@aussie.zone 6 points 1 year ago

Good question. Maybe the same reason why Elon "humour is now legal again" Musk can't take a little teasing?

[–] jibbist@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

The data is public, the feed just only prints out publicly available flight data - if Elon wants privacy, he should just charter a private jet used by other billionare dickheads, it's not exactly a hardship now is it

[–] bioemerl@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is why competition in the online space is essential and we need strong regulation to kill the network effects that keep Twitter and reddit afloat.

A platform should not be able to unilaterally censor anyone.

[–] lucidwielder@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What lol? They never owned the internet, more like the users loaned them their attention for years - till they really screw up which they’ve been doing as of late.

I have nothing against coming down on companies that try & do anti-competitive things & pulling an API via ridiculous pricing is one of those things I feel the FTC should have the power to intervene in but I know conservatives would scream government over reach. They already do with both smaller & bigger things.

Regardless kbin, mastodon & Fediverse are all strong responses to what’s been going on & sadly they all need to avoid inter connectivity w/ these behemoths to ensure they don’t try underhanded tactics to destroy it, ironically. Maybe when/if they get to be of similar sizes & the momentum is too great for them to destroy a competitor then connectivity btwn the 2 can be done but till then it’s not safe imho.

[–] protput@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

This is definitely the reason why Elon bought twitter.

[–] zeppo@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

The flap that Musk made about that led to one of the most ridiculously dumb phrases he has said yet: "assassination coordinates".

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Good to see.

[–] bighi@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

For platforms with an amount of users in many millions, we need regulations on who can be banned, and for what reasons you can't.

load more comments
view more: next ›