this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2023
228 points (100.0% liked)

Earth, Environment, and Geosciences

1792 readers
1 users here now

Welcome to c/EarthScience @ Mander.xyz!



Notice Board

This is a work in progress, please don't mind the mess.



What is geoscience?

Geoscience (also called Earth Science) is the study of Earth. Geoscience includes so much more than rocks and volcanoes, it studies the processes that form and shape Earth's surface, the natural resources we use, and how water and ecosystems are interconnected. Geoscience uses tools and techniques from other science fields as well, such as chemistry, physics, biology, and math! Read more...

Quick Facts

Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Be kind and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.


Jobs

Teaching Resources

Tools

Climate



Similar Communities


Sister Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Plants & Gardening

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Memes

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago (2 children)

‘Last weeks study said it was polyester clothing. The week before that it was fishing nets.

https://www.statista.com/chart/17957/where-the-oceans-microplastics-come-from/

[–] alvvayson@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The link you provided has synthetic clothing at 35% and tire dust at 28%.

The next two biggest categories are city dust and road markings.

It's not really that much of a shocker that a different study finds tire dust as the biggest category.

Fishing nets have never been a big contributor to microplastics. They are a big category of hazardous ocean waste.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] blackbrook@mander.xyz 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Read the first sentence: "Lost and abandoned fishing gear which is deadly to marine life makes up the majority of large plastic pollution in the oceans, according to a report by Greenpeace." I added the italics. Note also that the OP article is about micro plastics.

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Fishing nets don't photodegrade into microplastics?

[–] dansity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah its weird. Isnt vulcanised rubber heavier than water and sinks?

[–] Montagge@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

That would work if tires were nothing but rubber, but they're not.

https://e360.yale.edu/features/tire-pollution-toxic-chemicals

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I dunno man. Maybe we should all *checks notes, take trains or something?

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Good news! Electric cars are heavier and go through tires at a ridiculous pace! 👍

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I wouldn't say ridiculous, but you're not wrong about them going through tires faster.

Anecdotal but my phev is only 400 pounds heavier than ice vehicles built in the same frame. The energy saver EV tires are rated for 55000 miles vs 60000 for non energy saver version. The upside to the EV is less particulate matter produced by the brakes which get replaced about half as often thanks to Regen.

If anyone has the numbers comparing the gains/losses between the two is love to see them.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

PHEV are lighter than EV, the Niro gains 400lbs (over 10%) going from PHEV to full EV and it's already 300lbs heavier going from hybrid to PHEV!

There's also a big difference between what the tires are rated for vs what they usually last... My mother goes through a set of tires every 40k km or so with her Leaf even if the tires are rated for much more and the car's alignment is right on the dot!

[–] RawrGuthlaf@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago

At least they burn through far less brake pads. But it is a very correct assessment of tire usage.

[–] Montagge@kbin.social 20 points 1 year ago

It's also been known to be wiping out salmon before they spawn since 2020

https://ecology.wa.gov/blog/january-2023/saving-washington-s-salmon-from-toxic-tire-dust

[–] Dude123@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Remember, if you live near a major road you and your family are breathing in brake and tire dust constantly and it will take years off of your life. Not to mention the lower quality of that shorter life.

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 year ago

Such pollution is perhaps unlikely to have a direct impact on issues like climate change, but the potential toxicity for humans, animals, and the broader environment is a prime concern.

So I guess it's likely bad, but for different reasons.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

Makes sense to me, it's also a big contributor to the smog I breathe and the grime I get tired of dusting off everything in the damn apartment. We can stop blaming my skin particles, they're not that color. And my shoes don't get outside much. But my street feeds straight into the 405.

https://www.dri.edu/tailpipe-emissions-declining-brake-tire-wear-particle-emissions-remain-persistent-and-unregulated/

[–] Selmafudd@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

One place I worked my office was in the corner of the warehouse, when we moved warehouses I had to go up onto of the office for some reason and there was a almost a 5cm thick layer of tire and diesel dust on top of it.. I stepped on thinking it was just dirty and my shoe just went through it all

[–] AfricanExpansionist@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

/c/fuckcars