this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2023
3 points (100.0% liked)

News

22903 readers
3278 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A YouTube prankster who was shot by one his targets told jurors Tuesday he had no inkling he had scared or angered the man who fired on him as the prank was recorded.

Tanner Cook, whose “Classified Goons” channel on YouTube has more than 55,000 subscribers, testified nonchalantly about the shooting at start of the trial for 31-year-old Alan Colie, who's charged with aggravated malicious wounding and two firearms counts.

The April 2 shooting at the food court in Dulles Town Center, about 45 minutes west of Washington, D.C., set off a panic as shoppers fled what they feared to be a mass shooting.

Jurors also saw video of the shooting, recorded by Cook's associates. The two interacted for less than 30 seconds. Video shows Cook approaching Colie, a DoorDash driver, as he picked up an order. The 6-foot-5 (1.95-meter-tall) Cook looms over Colie while holding a cellphone about 6 inches (15 centimeters) from Colie's face. The phone broadcasts the phrase “Hey dips—-, quit thinking about my twinkle” multiple times through a Google Translate app.

On the video, Colie says “stop” three different times and tries to back away from Cook, who continues to advance. Colie tries to knock the phone away from his face before pulling out a gun and shooting Cook in the lower left chest.

Cook, 21, testified Tuesday that he tries to confuse the targets of his pranks for the amusement of his online audience. He said he doesn't seek to elicit fear or anger, but acknowledged his targets often react that way.

Asked why he didn't stop the prank despite Colie's repeated requests, Cook said he “almost did” but not because he sensed fear or anger from Colie. He said Colie simply wasn't exhibiting the type of reaction Cook was looking for.

“There was no reaction,” Cook said.

In opening statements, prosecutors urged jurors to set aside the off-putting nature of Cook's pranks.

“It was stupid. It was silly. And you may even think it was offensive,” prosecutor Pamela Jones said. “But that's all it was — a cellphone in the ear that got Tanner shot.”

Defense attorney Tabatha Blake said her client didn't have the benefit of knowing he was a prank victim when he was confronted with Cook's confusing behavior.

She said the prosecution's account of the incident “diminishes how unsettling they were to Mr. Alan Colie at the time they occurred.”

In the video, before the encounter with Colie, Cook and his friends can be heard workshopping the phrase they want to play on the phone. One of the friends urges that it be “short, weird and awkward.”

Cook's “Classified Goons” channel is replete with repellent stunts, like pretending to vomit on Uber drivers and following unsuspecting customers through department stores. At a preliminary hearing, sheriff's deputies testified that they were well aware of Cook and have received calls about previous stunts. Cook acknowledged during cross-examination Tuesday that mall security had tossed him out the day prior to the shooting as he tried to record pranks and that he was trying to avoid security the day he targeted Colie.

Jury selection took an entire day Monday, largely because of publicity the case received in the area. At least one juror said during the selection process that she herself had been a victim of one of Cook's videos.

Cook said he continues to make the videos and earns $2,000 or $3,000 a month. His subscriber base increased from 39,000 before the shooting to 55,000 after.

all 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 3 points 1 year ago

I hope Colie goes free and I hope Cook gets sued for everything he has. I don't know what you'd sue him for, but find something before he gets someone actually killed.

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

So, can I shoot him too?

[–] TheBananaKing@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Only in america is it legal and normal to attempt to murder someone for :checks notes: holding your phone near them.

[–] Turbo@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

What a douche bag

[–] theKalash@feddit.ch 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's one way to improve content quality on youtube.

[–] bobman@unilem.org -3 points 1 year ago

Eh, at least pranksters are willing to risk something.

Too much watered-down content on youtube that just exists to suck up time without ever hurting anyone's feelings.

[–] Someonelol@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

These prank channels should be completely demonetized to remove the incentive of doing stupid shit like this in the first place.

[–] SSUPII@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There was no reason for the person to be shot. Disgusting.

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] SSUPII@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

The person who shot did it directly, without actually showing what was he carrying. Just showing the gun would have had a better effect with no injuries and no arrest, and that already is going over the top.

You are an asshole for defending getting hurt for this. I want to assume you would not be so eager to go against the kid if it was your family member.

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are you kidding? Showing the gun to an attacker who is far larger than you is a ridiculous idea. They will just wrestle the gun away. This poor driver got scared out of his wits by a total human trash can who refused to stop when asked. That’s basically rape—of the mind.

He was attacked. And he defended himself. The YouTuber should be in jail for harassment.

What world are you living in? Lmfao.

[–] SSUPII@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

And in what backwards world are you living where someone had to risk his life for this. The prankster should be punished for harassment, but doesn't leave the fact that someone SHOT HIM FOR THAT. Nobody should be shot in a situation like this, period.

[–] SaintWacko@midwest.social -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, I can't believe that while being threatened by a large, erratically acting man, he didn't think to calmly try to defuse the situation/s

[–] SSUPII@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

There are ways to defuse a situation not entirely calmly without firing a gun.

[–] teft@startrek.website -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just showing the gun is called brandishing and is illegal. You don’t announce you have a weapon before you shoot someone because you could get shot if you do.

You are an asshole defending an asshole.

[–] SSUPII@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I didn't say it was not criminal, only that it would have had no injuries.

[–] teft@startrek.website -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Spoken like someone who knows little of self defense and firearms regulations.

[–] Junkers_Klunker@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I fucking HATE "pranksters. He shouldve shit him to death.

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

deleted by creator

[–] BruceTwarzen@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Spamming the same article around is cool, but is this really news?

[–] ZeroCool@feddit.ch 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The voting ratio seems to indicate that yes, this is in fact considered a relevant news item by the community but you can and should downvote it if you disagree. Now that we've cleared that up, do you have anything to contribute to the discussion or are you just here to whine because I posted an article in two relevant communities?

[–] dan1101@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Both people were way out of line. The shooter more than the harasser.

[–] jaamesbaxterr@lemmy.ninja 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why do I feel more sympathy for the shooter then? Let me explain myself. I don't condone his actions, but here's the thing.. You have no idea what a stranger is going through in their life. No idea what trauma lies in their past. Going up to strangers and trying to provoke them could yield wildly different responses from person to person, and in the world we live in that could easily involve anger. Some people are barely holding it together and all they need is a jarring incident like this to make them snap. The shooter didn't provoke this situation. Yes he reacted poorly, but the entire thing would have been avoided if the brain dead YouTuber wasn't going around trying to elicit a response for clicks.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net -1 points 1 year ago

Because in America, shooting someone is more socially acceptable than being an annoying twat.

[–] dan1101@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah maybe, but *shooting *him? That's not exactly a proportional response!

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Dude asked him to stop multiple times and was pursued. Shooting is totally justified.

[–] dan1101@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Move away from him more quickly, call security, call the police, ask bystanders for help. How is discharging a firearm in a food court a justified response to an unarmed pest? You are exactly the sort of person who should not carry a firearm.

[–] Hiuhokiguess@reddthat.com -1 points 1 year ago
[–] ntzm@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago

America moment