this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2023
428 points (96.9% liked)

politics

18898 readers
3839 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 202 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Conservatives genuinely support Russia invading innocent European countries and committing genocide. This is just who conservatives are.

Conservatism is a plague of oppression that is long overdue for a cure. There is no place in a modern civilization for conservatives.

[–] Uniquitous@lemmy.one 54 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Conservatism has been infiltrated and suborned by Russian intelligence.

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 37 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

This is what’s going on. I really don’t understand how it’s not very obvious to everyone that the entire Republican party has been infiltrated by the Russians.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago (8 children)

What If they haven't really been "infiltrated", though, in the conventional sense? What if they are deliberately inviting the Russian Influence in, because they like the Russian model of Capitalism better than ours?

I believe they are trying to build an Oligarchy here, on purpose, because they are planning to become the oligarchs.

[–] Invertedouroboros@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

I'm kinda more in this camp. I think Russia and the GOP are working together (kinda hard to live through 2016 without believing that on some level) but does that mean that Russian intelligence has "flipped" the GOP? I don't think so.

I think it's more of a convergent goals kinda situation. I think one of the things that the GOP wants to do to American politics is turn it into a open moneymaking venture. Not saying that it isn't defacto already there, but it is still looked down upon and technically criminal behavior to accept bribes and the like. Matters of enforcement aside.

Not only is that kind of blatent corruption already prevalent in Russian politics, Russia for there part would love a united states that they could just bribe to get off their back. The GOP is trying to comodify American politics and by consequence American power abroad and Russia is looking to be their number one customer.

Does that mean that Trump gets marching orders daily from Putin? No, probably not. There's probably some level of communication between them, but I doubt any of that takes the form of any kind of directives or anything.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It is obvious to everyone, which is why several key democracies around the world are funnelling billions into the only country actively fighting Russia. The US is using it's own intelligence and command functions to help guide Ukraine in what to fight and where. Russia is being overthrown and their arrogant invasion is how Putin will lose a tremendous amount of credibility worldwide.

Russian military tech has been proven to be substandard when compared to literally any other arms manufacturing nation except China and India. German, Swedish, UK, French, and US weapons are being used against Russia to incredible effect and showing other national leaders how ineffective Russian weapons are. This means far fewer nations will field Russian tech and gear.

Russian without the illusion of power will have some serious internal upsets, like the recent Wagner and rebel uprisings. Whoever replaces Putin will not renew those conservative back channels because those relationship are contingent on being an international asshole, which a new leader can't afford to be.

So don't worry about the long term effects since Russia may not be here for long. Everyone does see Russia being an international asshole and it's the reason they are losing their war.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Ubermeisters@lemmy.zip 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh no, it's fine; they are just asking questions.

[–] Feirdro@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

“Let me play devil’s advocate”

“Are what we pretend to be”

[–] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 108 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

My mom was bitching about this last night…after supporting efforts by the US & NATO when Putin first went in.

Now we need to stop sending money over there, it’s not our responsibility, let Europe deal with it, get rid of NATO, etc etc etc. Apparently if the US stops sending aid, we could feed every hungry child & house every homeless veteran in “our country” and take care of “our people”.

I told her those problems existed before 2022 and we didn’t fix them then, so this doesn’t really affect that now.

“But we could! If we wanted to!”

Well, yeah, that’s the root of the problem - we don’t want to. Ukraine is irrelevant to that argument.

I just figured these were the new MAGA/Fox talking points & changed the subject.

[–] TheJims@lemmy.world 61 points 1 year ago (3 children)

You can remind her of our obligations to Ukraine according to the Budapest Memorandum of 1994

It’s so strange how easily Trump convinced Americans to abandon almost all of their values.

[–] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wish I had remembered that at the time.

[–] TheJims@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It seems everyone has forgotten that it absolutely our obligation to defend Ukraine.

[–] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I remember reading about it when everything started, but I didn’t think to bring it up at the time. We fight a lot & disagreeing with her gives me a ton of anxiety.

[–] TheJims@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

How unfortunate sorry to hear that.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago

America could also do all that stuff if we stopped putting for-profit middlemen in between government services and the public, too.

But thats socialism

[–] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 72 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

10 years ago if you had pitched this as the story line for a movie: Republicans aiding Russia in invading Europe you would have been, at best, laughed out of the room.

[–] AFaithfulNihilist@lemmy.world 68 points 1 year ago

And yet 10 years ago is when Romney warned us. I remember having a conversation with my mother in which I sounded off incredulously about it, "I don't buy this red scare 2.0 thing" to which my mother said, "there's probably something to it if someone says you shouldn't trust their friends."

[–] someguy3@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The next moment there was a tremendous commotion. The banners and posters with which the square was decorated were all wrong! Quite half of them had the wrong faces on them. It was sabotage! The agents of Goldstein had been at work! There was a riotous interlude while posters were ripped from the walls, banners torn to shreds and trampled underfoot. The Spies performed prodigies of activity in clambering over the rooftops and cutting the streamers that fluttered from the chimneys. But within two or three minutes it was all over.

[–] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

I recognised this at once.

Perfect use of this passage.

Kudos.

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 67 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Some argued that the Biden administration was putting the interests of Ukraine ahead of domestic concerns.

Not really, but that would still be better than putting Russia's interests ahead of domestic concerns as the GOP has been doing for quite some time now.

[–] TwoGems@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

GOP has literally betrayed the entire nation for Russian money. Then they LARP and pretend they care about the cost of Ukraine. Like the Republicans would ever put that money into something like universal healthcare anyway.

[–] drekly@lemmy.world 58 points 1 year ago

I wonder why they care so much. It's as if someone is telling/paying them all to put the Ukraine support on hold. I wonder who 🤔

[–] tinkeringidiot@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Aid for Ukraine is almost entirely flowing through DoD’s budget (DoD sends weapons from storage, then buys new ones - this also helps end-run Dept of State export rules). DoD acquisitions don’t shut down with the rest of the government, they never have. Ergo, military aid to Ukraine will continue unabated through any shutdown.

Anyone in DC who’s surprised by this has no idea how a government shutdown works.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

everyone in DC knows how it works.

They are just feigning outrage for the base.

Just like how they screamed about evil vaccines, while having every single vaccine available during covid.

[–] tinkeringidiot@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

To be fair, they’re all ancient enough to be in the “high risk” category. 😂

[–] Nobody@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

A lot of the billions of dollars in aid is our old equipment from the 90s that was taking up room in storage and costing us money to maintain. Not having to maintain old vehicles is a net savings minus the cost of transporting them.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'd go further and say they don't know how countries work. A government shutdown is really insane to me, but shutting down the military would be just straight up destroying the country.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] flossdaily@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 year ago

Sure, but usually you hang traitors

[–] theodewere@kbin.social 36 points 1 year ago

all they know is there are vulnerable people, and they need to be able to threaten them in some way, and use them as a hostage

[–] Buffaloaf@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

I bet they're ok with getting their own paychecks during shutdown though.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

This is because Putty-boo either has compromat, or is bribing the shit out of them. (which is, itself, compromat.)

[–] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 12 points 1 year ago

Seems to me that they should be worried about keeping the lights on.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 8 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The Pentagon is reportedly planning to exempt aid to Ukraine from the impact of a potential U.S. government shutdown, sending MAGA Republicans opposed to the assistance into a tizzy.

Former President Donald Trump, who has claimed that he would personally be able to end the Russia-Ukraine war "in 24 hours," has demanded that Republicans "defund all aspects" of the government as the September 30 deadline fast approaches.

Pentagon spokesperson Chris Sherwood told Politico on Thursday that a decision had been made to exempt Ukraine operations during a potential shutdown, just after Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky visited Washington, D.C., to make the case for more military aid for his nation's efforts to fend off the Russian invasion.

But the only thing the @JoeBiden administration cares about is funding their proxy war in Ukraine," wrote former Republican Arizona gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake.

Department of Defense spokesperson Chris Sherwood said in a statement emailed to Newsweek that Operation Atlantic Resolve, the name given to the mission to aid Ukraine, was exempt from a shutdown because it "is an excepted activity under a government lapse in appropriations."

A group of 29 Republican members of Congress sent a letter to the White House on Thursday, vowing to oppose more aid, calling it "an open-ended commitment to supporting the war in Ukraine of an indeterminate nature."


The original article contains 546 words, the summary contains 220 words. Saved 60%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

load more comments
view more: next ›