this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2025
362 points (98.9% liked)

People Twitter

5685 readers
1255 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 8 points 56 minutes ago (2 children)

Why the fuck would 99% of people need to think about bullets hitting their car?

[–] kurwa@lemmy.world 2 points 37 minutes ago

When in America...

[–] Prandom_returns@lemm.ee 1 points 7 minutes ago

"Competinion" in the EU are shitting themselves laughing at this joke of a vehicle.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 4 points 32 minutes ago (1 children)

Obligatory... The Cyber truck is not rated as bullet proof. This footage was most likely produced with cartridges that have just enough gun powder to cycle the gun's action. Actual bulletproof vehicles are way more expensive.

[–] SolOrion@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 minutes ago* (last edited 7 minutes ago)

This footage was most likely produced with cartridges that have just enough gun powder to cycle the gun’s action.

Frankly, it's probably not even that much. They probably used a bolt action and really light powder loads. I'd say maybe it's a .22 but the dents look big for that.

Edit: Someone else posted this a JerryRigEverything video- it apparently stops .22 and 9mm. I'm pretty surprised.

[–] user1234@lemmynsfw.com 11 points 1 hour ago

Actually, that damage happened because I'm allergic to bullshit and I sneezed on it.

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 40 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

At this point, do any companies seriously see the cybertruck as “competition”?

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago

SAAB. Maybe.

[–] FelixCress@lemmy.world 17 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Yes. These selling assault rifles and inflatable dolls. Cash is limited.

[–] FelixCress@lemmy.world 87 points 4 hours ago (6 children)

Probably an airgun and not a very powerful one.

[–] Thatuserguy@lemmy.world 96 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Even if not, I doubt competitors are "shitting their pants" over this. Can't say the bulletproofness rating topped the list of features I was looking for in my next car purchase

[–] MyTurtleSwimsUpsideDown@fedia.io 17 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

If I could afford a new car, I might consider that feature given the potential of the next few years…

[–] Nollij@sopuli.xyz 31 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

More important will be the ability to repair it yourself when things inevitably break. Given that musk is insanely petty and political, you would need to count on whittling Tesla parts from a piece of wood.

[–] CMLVI@lemmy.world 14 points 3 hours ago

Or the fact that Cyber trucks rarely make it more than a few hundred miles (if that) before they shut themselves off. Also, if you are ever in an accident and it loses power, it may very well lock you in the vehicle while it burns you to death.

[–] TheLowestStone@lemmy.world 7 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

You can DIY bulletproof your own car with phone books if it really matters to you.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 hours ago

However, as Clarkson demonstrated in Iraq, you can't bulletproof a car with sandbags.

[–] MyTurtleSwimsUpsideDown@fedia.io 6 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I haven’t seen one of those in years. Lol.

The local ibrary might need to weed some outdated encyclopedias though. 🤔

[–] droporain@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 1 hour ago

Man I'm so glad I was tired of throwing them away.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 9 points 3 hours ago

If I could afford a new car, I’d rather move to a neighborhood where my car doesn’t get shot at.

[–] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 25 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (2 children)

according to some dude with a lots of guns, youtube channel and a cybertruck it will stop 9x19mm and .22 LR, but not .17 HMR, .223/5.56x45mm, or presumably anything bigger. .17 HMR will stop in doors, but will go through external plate

anyway this is movie plot scenario relevant only to edgelords. maybe it'll be easier to avoid being shot at by not being in a car associated with shitheads

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 6 minutes ago)

Places that have metal protecting you (legs), places not bullet proof, head and chest.
Doesn't sound that useful. Also the bridge I currently take to go to work as the main bridge is closed for updating for the next few months only supports 3 tons. So a cyber truck couldn't get to my residence without taking a 7 mile detour each way.

(Not that I was ever considering one nor could afford one)

Edit to also add fun fact for those that maybe didn't understand the size of a .22lr or a .223 listed above. .223 is also known as 5.56 NATO. though they sound similar in size, a .223 round has 10x the energy of a .22 (they are much larger and travel much faster)

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 hours ago (3 children)

Wait are the windows Bulletproof? Because I don't think you can do that and still comply with safety regulations.

[–] billiam0202@lemmy.world 8 points 2 hours ago

comply with safety regulations

Given that the Swastikkkars haven't had any sort of certification from NHTSA or any other testing institute, I think we can safely say they don't.

[–] ori@lemmy.world 6 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Cars with bulletproof windows definitely exist and can be driven on the street?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Hayduke@lemmy.world 9 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (2 children)

Why the fuck would someone be deluded enough to think this attribute of a vehicle is important enough for any established manufacturer to even give it the courtesy of a thought.

Adding something nobody asked for, for no reason, that nobody would ever be in a situation to find it useful only underscores just how impulsive and idiotic of a poseur Musk is. Though, I guess if I was some Nazi cunt, I might add "bullet-resistant transportation" to my list of requirements too.

[–] droporain@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 1 hour ago

Lol Luigi proof doors but not windows.

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

One of the many problems with our time is people say shit like this just to get reactions now. Irony is dead.

[–] Linktank@lemmy.today 7 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, aim for the windows?

[–] droporain@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Where people's heads and hearts are? That doesn't seem fair.

I wonder what a Super soaker full of hydrogen peroxide would do. I'm assuming it would rust like hell, but maybe not

[–] yuri@pawb.social 18 points 3 hours ago

it’d be a neat idea if cars actually regularly had to interact with projectiles! y’know what cars DO have to interact ALL THE TIME?

water.

[–] Hello_there@fedia.io 17 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

I don't know how anyone thinks buying a Tesla, and in any way supporting the guy supporting the Nazis in the EU, is acceptable.

[–] dditty@lemm.ee 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

This ☝️. Even buying a BMW, VW, or Porsche (former Nazi conspirators) probably isn't as bad as buying a Tesla from a current-day Nazi

[–] DankOfAmerica@reddthat.com 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

This is what I don't get. BMW, VW, and Porsche are all companies that supported the Nazis. Assuming that 99% of all employees at those companies when they supported the Nazis are no longer working there, what does it matter that they supported the Nazis? BMW, VW, and Porsche aren't a real person each. There's no Mr. BMW going into a secret mountain lair snickering while rubbing their hands together. It's really just a name for an economic system. The people all change like the boards on the ship of Theseus. And it wasn't BMW's, VW's, or Porsche's fault for not having just ethics. The entire country was taken over by Nazi's. Surely the people that resisted were removed or punished. Maybe some employees pulled a Schindler and protected people as best they could. Others tried that CIA sabotage manual shit that's hilarious. Some were all about Nazis. But, none of those people are there anymore in any effectual number. In other words, BMW is just a name as I understand it. Is there something I'm missing? Do we need to rename it to something else so that suddenly the root essence that supported the Nazi's is removed? While we're at it, do we need to rename Germany/Deutchland or shame them until they change their name?

[–] dditty@lemm.ee 2 points 20 minutes ago* (last edited 20 minutes ago)

I agree with many of your points. My last car was a BMW and I currently drive an Audi. This article from 2022 about David de Jong's book Nazi Billionaires goes into pretty good depth about this

[–] callouscomic@lemm.ee 4 points 3 hours ago

Other nazis and those who won't admit they are nazis are okay with it.

[–] AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 18 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Imagine making a social media account just to rusty trombone a corporation

[–] Prandom_returns@lemm.ee 1 points 13 minutes ago

This looks more like desperation. An "investor" desperately trying to keep themselves afloat.

[–] lemmylommy@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Perfect for the mall ninja crowd

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 12 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

My mother in laws car looked like that after a heavy hail storm, this is not a gun being used lol. What a pathetic publicity stunt.

[–] Shawdow194@fedia.io 14 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

They re did that stunt at release. They changed it up to gingerly throwing a tennis ball instead.

[–] Shawdow194@fedia.io 7 points 3 hours ago
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 8 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Everyone should watch the Top Gear Hilux episodes, and ask if a Cybertruck could go through that.

Some YouTubers have beaten up more modern trucks too.

[–] mke@programming.dev 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Some youtuber got a wankpanzer and, I think, an f150 to do "durability tests" with. Since the actual point is to create internet content, and the creator might kinda like elon for some reason, it's obvious that the tests and their results are ridiculous. It's like:

"Oh, no! The cybertruck's frame snapped off! There goes your trailer! The air suspension broke! The stupid tablet became a disco party of red warnings! ...but the f150 couldn't jump 5 feet into the air, and also the door has a hole in it from when we used explosives, issues which the cybertruck doesn't have. So they're neck and neck, really."

whistling douche bag

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 2 points 2 hours ago

Pity it can't hold up to a guy tugging on the bezel with one hand

load more comments
view more: next ›