this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2025
335 points (97.7% liked)

Weird News - Things that make you go 'hmmm'

1061 readers
720 users here now

Rules:

  1. News must be from a reliable source. No tabloids or sensationalism, please.

  2. Try to keep it safe for work. Contact a moderator before posting if you have any doubts.

  3. Titles of articles must remain unchanged; however extraneous information like "Watch:" or "Look:" can be removed. Titles with trailing, non-relevant information can also be edited so long as the headline's intent remains intact.

  4. Be nice. If you've got nothing positive to say, don't say it.

Violators will be banned at mod's discretion.

Communities We Like:

-Not the Onion

-And finally...

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Signature /= footer

Resist

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MiDaBa@lemmy.ml 10 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

MAGA voters couldn't identify a pronoun in high school. How are they supposed to figure it out now?

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

They could read the Bible: I am he

[–] Luvs2Spuj@lemmy.world 35 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Doesn't go far enough, remove pronouns from the email body too.

To it may concern. Notice did not complete task before deadline. Please can provide update? Look forward to reply.

[–] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 17 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] MoonRaven@feddit.nl 15 points 8 hours ago

Someone's about to get fired...

[–] Hirom@beehaw.org 20 points 16 hours ago

Small government regulating pronouns in worker's email signatures.

Regulations For Thee but Not for Me

[–] MunkysUnkEnz0@lemmy.world 66 points 21 hours ago (6 children)

For the life of me, I can't understand why they care about someone's sexual orientation or their pronoun.

I ran the numbers on sex changes and it's like .001 of the population. It's a non-issue.

The real issues are homelessness, inequality, Internet privacy, poisons in our food and workers' rights..

Not fucking pronouns.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 1 points 2 hours ago

They need an 'enemy' to rally people against and all the usual suspects are no longer politically expedient

[–] ArchRecord@lemm.ee 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Two core reasons:

  1. Demonization. They need someone to demonize, that distracts voters and the general populace away from their own misdeeds, and lack of functional policy. If you're too busy getting angry at the trans people, you won't strike against the Billionaires.
  2. Insecurity. If the world isn't actually as simple as you thought, your entire ideology is based on putting people into given labels and boxes to make your life easier, idealizing a nonexistent past, etc, then the world changing in any non-standard way is seen as something to be extremely afraid of. This is also what drives their concerns over immigrants ("replacing" their community's racial dynamic), homeless people ("not wanting to work" like they did), climate change (this couldn't possibly happen because then the industries and consumption you had your whole life would have to change), progressive education and scientific growth (learning new things about how what we used to think was wrong), etc. It's all rooted in just wanting things to stay the same.
[–] Rozauhtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

They don't care. The tactic is to have a minority that you can blame for all the bad things.

100 years ago it was the jews secretly running the world, today it's the evil trans people and immigrants conspiring to destroy The West™.

Trans are a small portion of the US and few people will care if they are rounded up and sent to camps. Doing so then normalizing that kind of behavior.

[–] executivechimp@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 11 hours ago

100 years ago they were also persecuting trans people. Here's a photo of them burning books in 1933, some of which were from the Institute of Sexual Science after it was raided by the Nazis. And it only got worse from there. Here's a whole article about it.

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 40 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

For the life of me, I can’t understand why they care about someone’s sexual orientation or their pronoun.

They don't. It's classic divide and conquer tactics to package up the general population into nice bite-sized chunks that they can destroy individually with minimal resistance from the others. Exact same shit is how the Nazis rose to power.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 15 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

Does that mean no-one can call him 'President' Trump or 'Mr' President any more?

[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 11 points 16 hours ago

Isn't president just a regular noun?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] w3dd1e@lemm.ee 28 points 20 hours ago (9 children)

Sorry to all the Blakes, Dylans, Ashleys, Francises, Shannons, Frankies, Charlies, Rorys, Blairs, Leslies, Angels, Billies, Sams, Kellys, Danas, Harleys, Adins, Caseys, and all the other non-binary/gender neutral names that I can't think of right now.

-signed a person with a non-binary name

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 54 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

Finally. Something that will bring down the cost of groceries...

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 1 points 4 hours ago

Try stopping eating animals. Huge cut in groceries

[–] Probius@sopuli.xyz 3 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Don't you know that adding your pronouns to an email costs an entire 6-10 bytes? There are children starving in Africa and you're wasting your bytes on pronouns! Shame on you.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kit@lemmy.blahaj.zone 118 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is so stupid. I know plenty of cishet people who include their pronouns in their sig because they have a gender neutral name.

[–] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 97 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Or, in my case, for solidarity and normalizing it.

[–] Soleos@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

Yes, this is why they care. It's part of woke ideology.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] DirkMcCallahan@lemmy.world 91 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Of course. How else will we prevent future aviation disasters?

[–] madjo@feddit.nl 10 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

And lower the price of eggs

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl -1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Eggs costing a lot is a good thing. Fossil fuels too. Switch to something better for the climate

load more comments
view more: next ›