this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2025
195 points (98.5% liked)

politics

19594 readers
4173 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Federal workers condemned a Trump administration email urging mass resignations, calling it a coercive and legally dubious move influenced by Elon Musk’s cost-cutting approach.

The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) offered “deferred resignations” while warning remaining employees of potential layoffs.

Critics, including unions and Democratic lawmakers, warned of widespread disruption to essential services.

The email’s phrasing echoed Musk’s past layoffs at Twitter, raising concerns about the administration’s intentions.

Senator Tim Kaine urged workers not to accept the offer, citing Trump’s history of broken promises.

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Whateley@lemm.ee 3 points 49 minutes ago

A person in the Discord I'm part of works for a small department within the Capitol. They said most of the department heads laughed at the email and likened Elon Musk to an idiot trying to rearrange furniture in the dark.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 40 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

It would be a mighty shame if the entire secret service took that buyout and got replaced by Italian plumbers. A mighty shame indeed

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 25 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Dude, if he gets assassinated and it comes out that the assassin's name is Mario, I may actually develop a belief in god.

[–] athairmor@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Problem is that god is a 13 yo boy, hyperdimensional gamer who is beaten by his step-dad, was rejected by his crush who also happened to be trans and he didn’t know it, and is procrastinating on a book report due in two in-game decades.

It won’t be so funny when he finally gets around to reading The Giver and decides that’d work for this campaign.

[–] echolalia@lemmy.ml 3 points 10 hours ago

They didn't send it to the secret service or the boarder patrol or ICE. I think also the post office didn't get the letter.

I wish there was some shaudenfruede to be had, but there is none.

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 15 points 12 hours ago

Full text of the email, from the source:

https://www.opm.gov/fork

IIRC the project 2025 shit included a loyalty test to conservative values and expelling those who don't pass. This feels like the step just before that.

[–] sumguyonline@lemmy.world 13 points 13 hours ago

His tactics are business shiester 101. Throw some bullshit out, IF someone is dumb enough to go against their best interest and actually take it, then you win, if no one takes it, you're no worse than you already were.

[–] libertyforever@lemmy.world -2 points 9 hours ago

Perhaps Reuters' latest polls, downsizing government is very popular among American people. It is the most popular issue among like 15 issues Reuters poll.

www.reuters.com/world/us/americans-sour-some-trumps-early-moves-reutersipsos-poll-finds-2025-01-28/