this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2025
252 points (94.4% liked)

Ask Lemmy

27799 readers
1865 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Please state in which country your phrase tends to be used, what the phrase is, and what it should be.

Example:

In America, recently came across "back-petal", instead of back-pedal. Also, still hearing "for all intensive purposes" instead of "for all intents and purposes".

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] laurathepluralized@lemmy.world 3 points 55 minutes ago

In the USA and other English-speaking countries: weary =/= wary.

For example, I'll see someone write something like: "I am weary of the campfire because it is so hot"

You aren't tired of the campfire! You are wary of it!

[–] Tregetour@lemdro.id 1 points 28 minutes ago

Capitalizing black mid-setence. It's an absolutely ridiculous convention, and something only the American Left could take seriously.

Sincerely, Everyone else

[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 8 points 4 hours ago

I don't generally correct people's spelling or pronunciation but something I've noticed occurring more and more lately is people using "loose" when they mean "lose" and it gets under my skin for unknown reasons

[–] Scott_of_the_Arctic@lemmy.world 15 points 6 hours ago

I ~~could~~ couldn't care less

Hold ~~down~~ the fort

The proof ~~is in the pudding~~ of the pudding is in the eating

~~elon musk~~ Twat

[–] Usernameblankface@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

In American English:

I left them know

I'm just leaving you know

No, no, a thousand times no!

You LET them know. You're just LETTING me know.

Also, they were driving and hit the breaks. Their car needed new break pads.

Just letting y'all know, it's BRAKES that stop a vehicle.

If the vehicle breaks, it'll stop, but that's not the system built into the car that makes it stop on purpose at the press of a pedal.

[–] BoxOfFeet@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

I know how a break petal works, dummy.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

I don't do it that much anymore as I learned to enjoy the freedom of using language, but I recently watched a miniminuteman video where he says pause for concern. which kinda makes sense so it's an eggcorn: something that would cause concern would hopefully also make one pause for a moment.

apparently this is a commonly misheard phrase though this was the first time I heard someone say it.

[–] cheers@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Can someone explain DEI and Affirmative action? 99% sure the right is using it wrong, but I live in a red state.

[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 hour ago

When the right uses it, it means one thing, when the left uses it, it means a different thing. Just like "woke".

DEI is corporate speak for an office or initiative to promote diversity, equity, and inclusion in a workplace. Diversity meaning not everybody there looks, talks, and thinks the same. Equity means that rules, compensation, etc., are fair for everyone, and inclusion means that people have a voice in decisions that affect them. Since historically, marginalized people have been black, female, indigenous, etc, DEI works specifically to correct unfairness towards them.

Since DEI is owned by corporate, there is only so much it can do to further these goals, and sometimes actively works to stall or placate people that have grievances with their workplace.

Affirmative Action is very similar, but usually specific to college admissions, compared to hiring workers.

I'm not an expert on DEI or Affirmative Action so if you want to know more about it try reading here:

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/what-is-dei-practice-trump-is-trying-dismantle-2025-01-30/
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diversity,_equity,_and_inclusion
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affirmative_action

Best of luck!

DEI is a catch-all term. It could be part of a marketing strategy, or it could be part of company culture. It's generally bullshit virtue signalling in the case of retailers like Target. It's good to have feedback and ideas from different cultures especially in a global marketplace. It includes both people of different races and culture like LGBTQ.

Affirmative action was policies of hiring a certain percentage of poc or women and ignoring white candidates with higher qualifications. It was an attempt to make up for systemic oppression. Places like colleges still try to balance student numbers by race, even limiting races like Asians because they would be over represented.

i feel like we should be able to beat the living shit out of people intentionally spreading political misinformation.

Like im sorry, this may not meet instance rules, or whatever, but like, holy fuck, the amount of shit you can just lie about, without people asking question, kneecaps should've happened years ago, what the fuck are we doing bro.

load more comments
view more: next ›