this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2025
180 points (97.4% liked)

Games

17247 readers
508 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 15 points 14 hours ago

I wonder how many trillions of floors Diablo 1 had if they had used this weird way of marketing No Man's Sky uses.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 13 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Why is trillions in quotes? Did they add them or not?

[–] Nibodhika@lemmy.world 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I write a planet generator. All of the planets are the same to begin with, so realistically I can only generate "1" planet. Then I add one toggle which is random, if it's on the planet will be completely water. I now have "2" planets. Now I add another toggle for one huge mountain, I can now generate "4" planets (dry,water,dry-mountain,water-mountain). Keep adding toggles, sliders and parameters until you have "trillions" of possible planets and you're done.

The funny thing is that the changes are cumulative, so if I release a game that can generate X planets and I add a binary toggle I can now claim I added X planets to the game. If I add a slider from 0-9 then I added 10X planets. So since No Man's Sky already had a giant number of planets, adding trillions of them could mean something as stupid as they added a new resource to the game so now every planet can have that resource in different amounts.

[–] birbs@lemmy.world 1 points 38 minutes ago

I thought I'd check which 2^N gets you to a trillion, it's N=40. So you can have 40 parameters per planet and add one more, then suddenly you've created an extra trillion planets.

[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 10 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

It’s a procedurally generated universe(s). These systems haven’t all been pre-generated, but will rather be generated to explore when a player visits a system for the first time.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 5 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

Right, but that still counts. Although I guess it's kind of an "if a tree falls in the forest" question. If the world doesn't exist unless you find it, was it really there before?

[–] zqps@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

The point is rather how meaningful this statement is. It doesn't really matter if your algorithm can come up with trillions of ways to place trees, if it's the same handful of trees it's still gonna feel samey after the third time.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago
[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 7 points 20 hours ago

I'd trade that update for one that fixed the jank combat. I will continue to complain about the gun being auto-holstered after 2 seconds without firing as one of the worst parts of combat, so "line your shot" is a terrible strategy because by the time it's lined, you'll miss due to the animation creating a 1s lag between click and shot.

The almost random targeting of what you'll interact with when holding E is another big annoyance.

Capital ships are a total letdown, too. All they do is sit around motionless in space. Can't destroy anything bigger than a fighter.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 27 points 1 day ago

When they say “trillions of new planets” they mean one new biome with the plants and rocks in a trillion different places.

[–] Fades@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Just more procedurally generated and boring as fuck “new planets”

[–] junkthief@lemmy.blahaj.zone 76 points 1 day ago (7 children)

I don’t want to yuck anyone’s yum, as the review scores keep improving so obviously folks are liking it, but you’re not alone if it still doesn’t click. They keep polishing it and piling on more stuff, but the base game is still rather disjointed and in my opinion, easy to burn out on. Procedural generation doesn’t mean any of the procedurally generated things are going to be interesting.

[–] TotalFat@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago

I like to pop in every time they drop an expedition. Those let you speedrun the game and get reacquainted with it with not much effort. You also get introduced to whatever new thing they added. It's a bit like playing ARK on a 20x resources 20x taming server so you can just play the game without so much grind.

[–] Tiefkuehlkost@feddit.org 12 points 1 day ago

True, i put something between 100 - 200 hours into it and while they repeatedly add "special stuff" i cant really motivate myself to go back, exploring feels boring after some time and the pve is ok but not good enough to be a motivation in it self, but to be fair im also not the collector type of guy and there may be a dedicated fanbase who enjoys this.

On the other hand not every game has to life for ever and if the average player has 50-100 hour of fun and than never again touches the game than that is also totally fine.

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yep, I had my fun on it, but without true PVE it's just another exploration/building game.

[–] MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You mean PVP? It's got Playter vs Environment in spades.

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 5 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

No PvE. This being a coop game, it's missing real challenge for pve.

[–] Nibodhika@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Which is? Admittedly I've only played the game for a couple of hours, but I remember there being PvE, so you're going to have to be more specific into what is it that you think is missing.

[–] MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Did you forget that single-player and perma-death are things?

That said, the real problem with what you're looking for vs this game is down to the premise: Interstellar travel without tech that feels like cheeting isn't a pew pew space-ship game. Generation-or-cryosleep-ship-simulator-gone-wrong isn't out ... yet.

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago

Huh? No, I'm literally talking about coop PvE. It would be nice to have a challenge when I am in space or when I'm trying to build a base.

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Yeah seriously, no matter how much they tack on, it still doesn't make the base game fun to play. Nothing more boring than a game that feels like a job.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 14 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Isn't the game's universe randomly generated and had nearly infinite worlds since launch? 🤨

[–] LostAndSmelly@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Close, proceduraly generated so psuedo-randomly to ensure that no planets are exactly alike. If you spend enough time in game it does begin to feel a bit like more of the same. Within 24 hours of this update I had already found a few things I had never seen anything similar to in the game.

[–] Nibodhika@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Were they interesting? Or at least enough of a change to make them significant? Or are we talking random rock model here?

[–] ChaoticEntropy 2 points 19 hours ago

It adds more complexity and distinction between planets, at least.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] minibyte@sh.itjust.works 2 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (7 children)

Can anyone recommend a decent space sim? I’ve talked myself in and out of buying No Man’s Sky a dozen times, and all this shade will probably remove it from my wishlist.

[–] LostAndSmelly@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

I fucking love No Man's Sky. I play video games to relax. Most of the time I ignore objectives and find my own way around. I used to follow people and creatures around Skyrim. I had been playing a ton of Red Dead Redemption 2 just to go ride hourses and look at stuff. My friend Trudi had me play 20 minutes or so on her computer and I bought my copy that day. I have been playing it off and on for a few years now.

[–] chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz 1 points 4 hours ago

Just play NMS. Get it on sale if the price is a concern. It's neat.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 3 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

I'm enjoying x4. I also liked Elite Dangerous but that one was more limited in what you could do. They have added more in the years since I've played it though

[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago

There’s a lot of different types of space sims. What kind of gameplay are you looking for?

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 8 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Depends on what you want out of the game. Freelancer is old, but it's still one of the best experiences you can get. If you really want to feel like a nobody pilot going from rags to riches, X4 or Elite: Dangerous can scratch itch, but both have considerable learning curves, with X4 allowing you to own space stations and pilot anything from fighters to frigates.

[–] moleverine@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I put so much time into Freelancer. The multiplayer was really fun if you had a friend to fly with.

Rebel Galaxy feels a lot like it, but it's focused on capital(ish) ship combat (broadsides, etc) instead of fighters.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I need to get back on Rebel Galaxy, I think I got some 2 or 3 missions past reuniting with your aunt. The sound track is fucking amazing, though the gameplay being essentially naval battles in space really let me down at first, as I personally prefer 6 degrees of freedom, but the game does all things well.

[–] moleverine@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

Yeah, the soundtrack is perfect for the vibe the game is going for.

[–] ChaoticEntropy 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Where can you get Freelancer these days...?

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Only in yo ho ho seas 🏴‍☠️

[–] ChaoticEntropy 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

It's annoying that it isn't at least on GOG, it's such a prime candidate.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 2 points 12 hours ago

True. It's been number one requested game, but its copyright hell is among EA and Microsoft :(

[–] Saganaki@lemmy.one 3 points 19 hours ago

Not really a sim, but def a fan of space games. Void Crew has been great.

[–] ChaoticEntropy 3 points 19 hours ago

Depending on what you want, Freespace 2 and all its mods/updates are still excellent. Wing Commander Saga is a standalone game based on it of remarkable quality.

[–] codexarcanum@lemmy.dbzer0.com 63 points 1 day ago

Well that's good, I was just getting close to running out of the old planets.

[–] ocean@lemmy.selfhostcat.com 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Kind of wild they keep going.

[–] barkingspiders@infosec.pub 21 points 1 day ago (5 children)

if all it takes to keep a developer improving their game is to hype it to the moon and then turn it into a meme when it releases then maybe we should do that more often /s

forreal forreal though these game devs are the shit and I'm grateful for all the work they keep putting into this

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›