this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2025
1054 points (96.1% liked)

Science Memes

11802 readers
887 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zepp@kbin.earth 1 points 1 day ago

Well yes, but actually no.

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 30 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Aargh! Okay, I'm going to fix this and the fine tuned universe argument all at once.

Nature does not care about your silly numbers and hypotheses. All of our scientific mechanics are models of the observed universe. The ones we call theories are just models good enough to be usefully predictive as to forecast outcomes, allowing us to safely land airplanes, build bridges, make safe pharmaceuticals (or super addictive ones, if we want), split atoms safely to produce power (or unsafely to level cities) and so on.

We care about the math and the numbers because they give us results that are consistent with nature. But nature is doing what it's doing because it's behaving as a giant causal engine (ever-smaller forces that drive observable phenomena, at least until we get to Planck scale). So when it comes to the fine tuned hypothesis, to quote a Texas physicist whose name I can't remember These numbers ain't for fiddlin'

If there are any storm gods at all, anywhere in the world, to the last, they are content to allow lightning to behave strictly according to static-electricity electrodynamics. And ball lightning happens whether or not we have a model that explains it. (Presently, we don't.)

If one or more of the many-worlds hypotheses are true, no given universe cares what its science-savvy inhabitants have determined and whether their mathematical models allow for models that are factual. Facts don't care about your feelings. Facts don't care about your science either. It's more that the science does is best to describe what's going on in the facts.

Irreducible complexity is solved.

PS: This also stabilizes the cosmic horror scenario of Azathoth's dream, that Azathoth gibbers in the center of the universe dreaming its whole, and each and every one of us is a mere figment, who will vanish to oblivion when eventually he awakes: From what we can observe Azathoth has been dreaming consistently for thirteen billion years, and doesn't seem to be in a hurry to wake up, and his dream is profoundly consistent so that the mathematics we use to send probes from planet to planet, eventually into the outer solar system always works. Azathoth has our back!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] kryptonidas@lemmings.world 150 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Infinite options does not mean all options. Eg in the set natural numbers 0-infinity the set of infinite numbers between 0-1 (or between any other 2 adjacent numbers) is absent.

So you can definitely have an infinite multiverse where in all of them infinite multiverses exist.

[–] moody@lemmings.world 54 points 3 days ago (1 children)

There are infinite numbers between 0 and 1, but none of them is 2.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 21 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Infinite options does not mean all options.

Right, as you said the natural numbers is an infinite set but it doesn't contain fractional numbers between adjacent natural numbers. The set of natural numbers also doesn't contain letters, or colors, or varieties of geese. You can even add other constraints to the set and still have an infinite set that contains even fewer possible values, like you could have the set of all natural numbers that don't contain the digit 3.

People make the mistake of thinking that an infinite set of universes means that there is every conceivable version of a universe out there, but that's not the case. Murphy's law says that anything that can happen will happen, but that means things are still constrained by what can happen. Reality is constrained by consistent logic, the most basic of which is the identity law, p = p. It is a contradiction for both p and ~p to be true, a violation of reality. So if the multiverse is a reality, it is a single reality that is self consistent, meaning there is no Universe in the multiverse for which there doesn't exist a multiverse.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Ultraviolet@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

The set of all possible universes does not include impossible universes. If you assume all possible universes exist, you've already eliminated universes that are the only universe as impossible.

[–] De_Narm@lemmy.world 82 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Given an unlimited amount of tries, I can win any major lottery 10 times in a row.

Given an unlimited amount of tries, I still cannot go super saiyan. Believe me, I'm close to that amount of tries!

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 34 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Have you tried screaming and flexing really hard?

[–] Test_Tickles@lemmy.world 41 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Ya, I pooped a little and lost consciousness.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world 50 points 3 days ago (11 children)

Infinite doesn't mean everything. Infinite can include a repeating pattern, even a huge repeating pattern which seems random at first. Not everything you could possibly imagine would necessarily have to exist in the multiverse.

And even if infinite and perfectly random, some things may just not be feasible and just not exist.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 25 points 3 days ago

this is stupid. The existence of an infinite number of universes does not at all imply they must represent infinite variability.

[–] rmuk 25 points 3 days ago (6 children)

"If there is an infinite number of buckets, there must be a bucket where the other buckets don't exist."

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] smiletolerantly@awful.systems 27 points 3 days ago (7 children)

Oof that reminds me...

When my partner and I had already been living together for a while, we had one of those "cuddle on the couch and deeptalk" days, when she confided that, while she was not religious in any traditional sense of the word, she felt immensely comforted by the thought of an infinite multiverse existing.
"If there's an infinite amount of parallel worlds, then I choose to believe that even if I die here, life goes on in another world, so in a sense my being and existence do not simply vanish completely. Same for you! And hey, even if we both die, we'll get to continue living together in some version of the infinite multiverse!"

It was clearly a thought that comforted her a lot, and at the same time a rather intimate belief that she chose to share with me. So, like the idiot I am, I stared her in the face blankly and went "There's an infinite amount of numbers between 0 and 1, and none of them are 2".

I really regret that. She let me know later that that one sentence shattered the belief for her. Which is sad, because it's such an innocent thought. There's no religious behaviors or conditions or rituals attached to it, it's just comforting.

[–] Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It's comments like this that make me glad I know how to read the room

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

That's a nice belief of hers but it also neglects the negatives of what that implies. If each of us had infinite variations of ourselves somewhere in a multiverse, then there are varieties where the two of you continue living a nice happy life together even if one of you dies.

However, there would also be versions where you never met and got together with other people, other versions where you hate each other, other versions where you go through terrible things together or by yourselves, versions where one of you or both are drug addicts living in the street, versions where you become millionaires but don't want to share your wealth, versions where you become supreme leaders and act like despotic authoritarian rulers or versions where both of you just never meet or connect with one another.

If there are infinite variations of ourselves out there, not all of them will be happy comforting stories. Maybe this is one of those versions that are good. Maybe this is one of the best versions.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 33 points 3 days ago (2 children)

If there are multiple countries on the planet Earth, that must mean there's a country where the other countries don't exist.

[–] echodot 27 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I think that's North Korea

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 19 points 3 days ago (2 children)

You spelled United States of America wrong.

[–] echodot 9 points 3 days ago

Most Americans acknowledge the existence of other countries, that just refuse to believe those other countries have access to electricity, plumbing, or the internet.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 10 points 3 days ago (2 children)

The multiverse either exists or it doesn't. Individual universes have no influence over that.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Don't you love it when people say random, illogical bullshit that sounds vaguely sciency and pretends to be deep?

[–] null@slrpnk.net 14 points 3 days ago

Of course not, I hate jokes

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 38 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Given an unlimited amount of tries, anything that has a non-zero chance of happening, no matter how unlikely will happen. But what has absolute zero chance of happening will still not happen.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 18 points 3 days ago

This is illogical. That is all.

[–] MeatPilot@lemmy.world 25 points 3 days ago

I know one thing that's absolutely true about the multiverse!

The multiverse is a convenient excuse to reboot superheroes for a new audience to make money.

[–] answersplease77@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I have not seen not even on paper a universe which allows casual paradoxes like that comment says

[–] BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee 21 points 3 days ago (1 children)

because you arent in the universe that has that paper

load more comments (1 replies)

there is a universe full to the brim with chickens, all that chicken space.

[–] lunarul@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Knelt6526@lemmynsfw.com 7 points 3 days ago
[–] Chronographs@lemmy.zip 18 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I’d argue that multiverse theory being true would be a property of the multiverse, not a property of any individual universe, but the ‘infinity not including all possibilities’ part is true too

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ekZepp@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee 8 points 3 days ago

I never realized I til this moment that is a TF2 model.

load more comments
view more: next ›