this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2025

-23 points (18.9% liked)

Conservative

269 readers

31 users here now

We are a community dedicated to discussion surrounding the political right.

People of all political views are welcome here, but we expect a high level of discussion from everyone.

Rules:
-Good Faith participation only. take hollow shit slinging elsewhere please
-Stay on topic. should be obvious
-Follow instance rules. They pay the bills, they get to set rules.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

TheGreatTaint@sh.itjust.works

BottomTierJannie@sh.itjust.works

-23

Pro-Life Texans Gather In Austin To Rally Against Abortion | News Radio 1200 WOAI | San Antonio's First News (woai.iheart.com)

submitted 5 days ago by Amoxtli@thelemmy.club to c/conservative@sh.itjust.works

17 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 17 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

The idea of a community with the Gadsden flag celebrating an attempt to restrict rights is as hilarious as ever

[–] Majorllama@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

As a Gadsden flag enjoyer I find that most people that fly the flag have no fucking clue what it actually means.

The one that always cracks me up is the Gadsden flown alongside a thin blue line flag.

Motherfuckers who do you think the government is gonna fetch when it's time to start treading??

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

If only they were pro life, but we know they aren't.

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

And they're all catholic-school teens, a group well known for its critical thinking skills...

[–] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

Some would say they have been groomed their whole life.

[–] BeardedBlaze@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago

Ah yes. The state that has no problem in self defense, as long as it involves guns, not doctors.

[+] novacomets@lemmy.myserv.one -9 points 5 days ago (1 children)

What are they doing advocate that pregnent women don't murder their children?

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Murdering your own children has been illegal forever. It's women's healthcare that classic religious terrorists, and modern Republican fascist terrorists, are trying to make illegal now.

[–] novacomets@lemmy.myserv.one -5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

You don't know the meaning of fascism. You are the kind if oersin that you are trying to insult.

You want to make legal for a pregnent woman to ask someone to murder her child while she is still pregnant.

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Did this pregnant woman give birth to a child in the past, and is she looking to have that child assassinated in this scenario? That's covered under regular old murder laws.

[–] novacomets@lemmy.myserv.one -2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I am talking about before a woman gives birth to a baby, whether she is 4 weeks pregnant, or 3 month pregnant, and she wants to murder the baby inside of her before she gives birth.

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That's called an abortion, not murder. See, since it's inside of a human with her own agency, no one else has any say in what she does. It's a very simple concept called bodily autonomy.

[–] novacomets@lemmy.myserv.one -2 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Bodily autonomy of the person inside her during pregnany. If she does not want to be pregnant then she must remain celibate and never be with any man.

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

The fetus is not a person, not a body.

You don't get to tell the woman what to do with her body any more than she gets to tell you what to do with yours.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Bodily autonomy of the person inside her during pregnany.

Even if we hold that a fetus is a person, that person is not having their bodily autonomy violated.

Even if we hold that abortion is murder, it is still morally right, because the right to bodily autonomy is more important than the right to life.

[–] novacomets@lemmy.myserv.one -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The right to life is the supreme law and rule. Everything else is secondary, including bodily autonomy is secondary to the right to life. During pregnancg, the lifeof the baby is most important. The mother has already lived her life, she decided to mess around and get pregnant, the baby must be protected at all cost during pregnancy because the baby has not had a chance at it's right to life yet, so the baby's life comes first, the mother's life is seconday.

She should never been with a man if she was not willing to sacrifice her own life and put the life of the child insider of her as first priority, she comes second.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago

The right to life is the supreme law and rule. Everything else is secondary, including bodily autonomy

So, why aren't we forcing people to donate blood? Or organs? Why can't we take half your liver, against your will, to save someone else?