this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2025
172 points (97.3% liked)

politics

19693 readers
4356 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dumples@midwest.social 55 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Trump and the rest of the right wing nutjobs want to seem powerful and unstopped. But the are not strong and fractured. I think we should get back to calling them weirdos again. It undercuts their aura of menace which is their only real power. Nothing scares right wingers than people different from them being themselves unsacred and proud. They are all a bunch of weirdos and should be called out for what it is.

[–] DigitalNirvana@lemm.ee 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

And call out the president for everything wrong anywhere in the world, calling for him to fix it. Call out every failure, constantly. Make him feel the weight of the presidency, the weight of each and every failure.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It sounds like you are suggesting that we attack via Trump's sense of shame. I don't feel like I need to explain why that's not going to work out.

[–] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago

Ego more than shame I would think.

[–] dumples@midwest.social 5 points 1 week ago

Exactly. Show him what is going wrong. He can win elections because he promises everything. You can not deliver anything

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think we should get back to calling them weirdos again.

I so fucking hate that someone pumped the brakes on that. Seeing Walz calling them weird was like manna from heaven, because it is so fucking TRUE. They are freaks and weirdos. Musk is a freak. Donvict is definitely a freak. That freak Mike Johnson and the porn sharing thing with his son? Marge, having a meltdown over a normal question about why the J6 terrorists were released?

None of them can be called even remotely normal.

[–] dumples@midwest.social 2 points 1 week ago

Exactly. As much as they want to pretend like they are the "silent majority" but they are so weird. Weird obsession with everyone else's genitals, bathrooms and what people are doing in their own homes. Weird, weird weird

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

What a brave call to action. Why didn't the Allies think of that??

[–] mipadaitu@lemmy.world 53 points 1 week ago

Trump looks pretty fucking weak to me, but I wouldn't be surprised if he was actually weaker than my already low standard.

[–] mako@lemmy.today 41 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm not sure how that's possible. He appears to be the weakest, most fragile coward one could imagine.

[–] Rakonat@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Rafael Cruz is right over there.

[–] Fungah@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago

Dude looks pretty fucking weak to me.

[–] moshankey@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Weak yes. But weak minded is the noticeable thing that I don’t see enough people talking about. I may be missing something. His sentence structure and repetition of the same adjectives, as well as the slowed speech show that something ain’t right. Why is this not pointed out more? Maybe I’m reading the wrong articles.

[–] qprimed@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 week ago

deliberate or emergent, it resonates with a shockingly large number of people. shared brain damage, if you will.

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 week ago

It's not called out because his name isn't Biden.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 week ago

Many of us called it out breathlessly for the last ten fucking years...

He has normalized it.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I hope your right random website author

[–] ZombieMantis@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

I would fucking hope so, but if he's as powerful as he and his party would like us to think he is, then may God help us all.

[–] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Two words will describe the next four years: Dumpster Fire.

[–] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

Hey if the first 2 are bad enough maybe we can do something about the next ones. It's the only hope I've got right now.

[–] ChowJeeBai@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Well, the people sitting it out apparently didn't think it was that big a deal.

[–] ChowJeeBai@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

He looks pretty fucking weak. Just saying.

[–] TheTimeKnife@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

He looks like an elderly man who is addicted to spray tan.

[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Cruelty is a weak person's desperate attempt at looking (not even being) strong.

And neither one works.

The nastier he becomes, the weaker he is.

[–] Waffle@infosec.pub 5 points 1 week ago

He's like a frail newborn with no neck control and tiny little baby hands

[–] psyklax@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Bet I could take him in a fight

[–] GladiusB@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I think a wet napkin can take him in a fight

[–] PlantDadManGuy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

I'm surprised his tiny hands can hold up that heavy paper.