this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2025
280 points (94.0% liked)

196

1174 readers
4739 users here now

This community only has one rule.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

founded 1 day ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] IOMMU@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 hours ago

I named mine Blahaj just so I negate any pronunciation issues. Like Data from star trek

[–] fxomt@lemm.ee 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I will pronounce it how i please. Bloyhagg 😤

[–] hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 hour ago

Personally I prefer to pronounce it "bog hag".

[–] pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 13 hours ago

Ah, but I named my Blåhaj blahaj because I like to mispronounce it

[–] Scott_of_the_Arctic@lemmy.world 14 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

This is pretty accurate

I mean it's being pronounced by Swedes so it should be. it'd be written blåhai in Norwegian but pronounced the same.

[–] Scott_of_the_Arctic@lemmy.world 12 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Also, if you want to get the correct Danish pronunciation, try pronouncing it the Swedish way while blackout drunk with someone's ball sack in your mouth.

[–] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 2 points 3 hours ago

Norway 200 Years! - (Danish Language Explained)

Others are split, whether Danes having a frog or a hot potato in their mouth while speaking.

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 44 points 18 hours ago (9 children)

It's spelled blahaj because I, like most people, don't have an å (yeah, copied that out of the title) on my keyboard. Unless you want us to write blohaj instead, I guess.

[–] SpiderShoeCult@sopuli.xyz 24 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Technically you should write it blaahaj instead (if writing Norwegian or Danish, that is). Before the adoption of the Swedish å, aa used to be used in Norway and Denmark for the same sound.

[–] hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

So that's why it looks similar to a or ä. I've always wondered that if it makes an o sound, why doesn't it look like an O.

[–] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Historically, 'Å' was an 'A' with an additional 'a' on top. This has evilved into becoming the '°'. Similarly, 'Ä' was an 'A' with an 'e' on top, which evolved into becoming two dots.
Interestingly, these umlauts are treated as extra characters in the Nordics but in German they aren't. That's why Swedish dictionaries are sorted from 'A-Ö' while German ones are 'A-Z'. So in order to find German Ärger or Swedish ängen, you need to look at different spots in the dictionary ('Ä' -> 'Ae' (1st letter of the German alphabet) vs. 'Ä' (28th letter of the Swedish alphabet).

[–] yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 17 hours ago (3 children)
[–] Prunebutt@slrpnk.net 7 points 16 hours ago

Dieser Hai gehört nun der Bundesrepublik Deutschland.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] GrilledCheese@lemmy.blahaj.zone 52 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

“Blow High” is what I was told, though that had nothing to do with the sharks name ;)

[–] lvxferre@mander.xyz 22 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

"Blow high" gets really close to the Swedish pronunciation. Or at least the closest that you can get in English.

(English hates long monophthongs so you can't get the same vowel as that [o:] represented by ⟨å⟩ in Swedish. "Blow" has [əʊ̯] or [oʊ̯] depending on the dialect.)

[–] GrilledCheese@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 16 hours ago

Thanks for the info and linking the pronunciation!

[–] alx@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 12 hours ago
[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 29 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

This isn't Tiktok I don't have to know how to say it right.

This is Lemmy, it's text-based, and technically the domain is "blahaj" because "å" isn't a valid character in URLs.

Finally, grammar and spelling policing sucks.

[–] Thorry84@feddit.nl 14 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Wrong actually, Unicode URLs have been a thing for quite some time now, including domain names.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internationalized_domain_name

[–] fushuan@lemm.ee 2 points 3 hours ago

Well, the instance is still blahaj regardless of what Unicode URLs can do. So it's correct to skip the å because it's not on the actual current url.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

Internationalized domain names are stored in the Domain Name System (DNS) as ASCII strings using Punycode transcription.

It's a workaround, not actual support.

https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/20995262/12487230

[–] Thorry84@feddit.nl 5 points 16 hours ago

Disagree, I think it's actual support.

Who cares about the technical implementation, it works doesn't it? It is fully supported by all modern systems, you type in the Unicode URLs and you see the correct page. Just because it gets converted to some other encoding along the way doesn't mean it's somehow no longer valid. Lots of things get transcoded along the way, nobody cares about that.

[–] Blahaj_Blast@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 16 hours ago

Well, now you tell me!

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 24 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

å is more like “aww”, as in “aww, look at the cute shork”

[–] OfCourseNot@fedia.io 5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

But like the o in lot, or roll, or corn, or tailor, or women...?

[–] DragonsInARoom@lemmy.world 6 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] criticon@lemmy.ca 4 points 16 hours ago (1 children)
[–] hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] innermeerkat@jlai.lu 4 points 14 hours ago

They asked if it moans

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 7 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

blåhaj.com is a thing, why not blåhaj.zone? It's possible.

[–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

In DNS, the domain name has to be ASCII, so unicode characters in the domain name are converted to Punycode and prefixed with xn--. So really, blåhaj.com is really xn--blhaj-nra.com (put that in your browser and watch the name change).

I would imagine that most things would just work, but there would probably be some annoying bugs with different clients who aren't using libraries which support internationalized domain names, or aren't expecting them. It'd probably be a good thing to have an internationalized domain name for a popular instance, as that would be a good test case for servers and clients to support that standard.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

I'm personally convinced limitations like this are why English is becoming such a dominant language, because the internet and most coding was all designed in English for English, without consideration for other languages. Other languages have to get tacked on with semi-complicated workarounds like this.

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 13 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

Cultural imperialism.

Adapting keyboards to non-alphabetic languages for example. Forced Chinese to adopt a romanized way to type things out and learn a new alphabet.

Although they actually eventually became some of the fastest typists on earth thanks to the predictive auto-complete (as I understand it) they adopted decades prior to the rest of the world using it on phones.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

It was actually more that early computers had such limitations on compute and memory that they had to limit what they could work with. The internet is still built from the ground-up on tech from 40-50 years ago.

It can appear and act as cultural imperialism, but there's actually a lot of evidence that it was just people making a new thing and not thinking that far forward with what they were doing.

Usually cultural imperialism is considered something a society does on purpose to force other societies into their mold. There is plenty of evidence this one is honestly purely accidental and not purposeful.

[–] bdonvr@thelemmy.club 5 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, I don't blame the creators. They didn't know how these things could affect others nor know their standards would last so long.

But the US and other Western powers became the tech powerhouses they did through imperialism and exploitation, so really these things can be viewed as an extension of that imperialism.

Intentional? Perhaps not. But it's still reality that it makes things harder for much of the world, and it's something that should be pushed back against.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.

All of this stuff is 50 years old and there's no way the people who put these systems in place could have ever predicted the Internet as it is today. Famously in 1973, there was a "map of the ARPA network", that's how few machines were "online" at the time.

Map of Arpa net in 1973

It's really only in the past 10 years or so that security via TLS has been widely adopted by websites, and it's been over 20 years since IPv6 was announced and still is not entirely supported everywhere. There is so much inertia with the underlying infrastructure of the internet, even if there is a serious issue (like DNS cache poisoning ), systems will not be reworked and replaced, but hacks will be added to fix the issue of the day.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LGTM@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

So is it [bloːhaj]? I was trying to say [bloːhɑj] but [ɑ] feels perhaps odd next to the glide?

Completely an inference from https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA/Swedish so I may have fucked up the phonotactics

load more comments
view more: next ›