this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2025
359 points (97.1% liked)

News

23774 readers
4617 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Elon Musk, co-head of the Department of Government Efficiency under Donald Trump’s advisory team, revised his claim of finding $2 trillion in federal budget cuts to a “best-case outcome” of $1 trillion.

Musk’s earlier target, dismissed as unrealistic by experts, had included the entire discretionary budget of $1.7 trillion.

While Musk and co-lead Vivek Ramaswamy plan to recommend cuts, specifics remain unclear.

Experts warn savings may require targeting mandatory programs like Medicaid, potentially causing hardships.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 12 points 3 hours ago

Can we take a moment to acknowledge a few billionaires made their own government department, and people are just rolling with it?

They're a random private company. Why are we just letting that fact slide???

[–] assassinatedbyCIA@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Man who lies endlessly caught lying again. More at 7.

[–] chuck@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Seriously what an unexpected outcome....

The one trillion difference needs to be paid back from his salary and a potential salary claw back for this underperformance.

[–] varyingExpertise@feddit.org 2 points 3 hours ago

I think he isn't getting a salary, apart from whatever gains he reaps by removing roadblocks for his companies.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 8 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Elon is such a dumbass.

Edit: I'm sorry, *President Elon is such a dumbass.

[–] Nunar@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

I want to join truth social just to call out "president Elon"

[–] Nunar@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago

And Trump won't bring down grocery prices. I really wish Americans were smarter. It's going to be a rough ride. At least I'm not going to have to subscribe to the NYT to see the obituary that I want to.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 3 points 5 hours ago

It’ll be 2 million, and way less than the amount the DOGE department manages to embezzle itself.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 26 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Wherever he cut, you can safely assume it will only hit the people at the bottom, not those at the top.

[–] varyingExpertise@feddit.org 3 points 3 hours ago

It will hit whatever annoys him, his companies and that extends to everybody who kisses his ring sufficiently.

But yes, social and worker protections probably match that criteria.

[–] zipzoopaboop@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 10 hours ago

Whatever supports his companies

[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 26 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

i’m actually kind of shocked he admitted this. isn’t his usual strategy to promise super unrealistic things, not deliver, and then make the same promise the next year?

[–] utopiah@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

Indeed, but I bet he isn't used to hide things in the public. This is a federal budget, not yet another of his corporations. I bet he knows the very best accountants but that's just different.

[–] 5in1k@lemm.ee 23 points 16 hours ago

If he cuts anything it’ll be support for middle class and poor people and itll be jack shit, it will fuck everything up and it will be touted by clowns as a success.

[–] makyo@lemmy.world 166 points 23 hours ago (5 children)

Anyone who actually believed they would find $2 trillion was an idiot, the rest of us knew they'd just cut the things they hate, bump the subsidies that favor them and their friends, and call it a day.

[–] bitchkat@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

I expect them to privatize and then somehow claim they cut the budget because they are paying a private company instead of running whole departments themselves (govt)

[–] Cypher@lemmy.world 43 points 22 hours ago (9 children)

Your comment will age poorly when Trump’s tarrifs lead to a collapsing economy and he prints money like mad to solve it, resulting in hyper-inflation letting President Musk keep his election promise.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 22 hours ago

The funny thing is....it's not like their voters would care if they lied. They could literally say "We cut the budget by $17 trillion by making sure the trans kids don't get surgeries!" And their voters would fucking cheer.

They wouldn't look deep enough to actually care what they cut.

So the question is why even make this announcement? I'm guessing it's a distraction from something else.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 77 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Remember when he landed people on Mars in 2022?

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 54 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Remember when Tesla released fully autonomous self driving cars?

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 26 points 21 hours ago (3 children)

That was way back in 2014, hard to imagine a world without them now! It's how I take my cybercab to the hyperloop to get to work!

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] scutiger@lemmy.world 8 points 15 hours ago

I'm shocked, SHOCKED by this revelation!

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 10 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

It's all going to be healthcare / social safety nets, and it's going to be dwarfed by the tax cuts Trump gives people.

[–] Whateley@lemm.ee 14 points 18 hours ago

Those two clowns couldn't find their own asses in a dark room with both hands and a flashlight.

[–] shininghero@pawb.social 24 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Oh please, you're not even going to get $100 billion without stepping on some toes in the Military-Industrial complex, and that's going to make you some lifelong political enemies.

[–] Blackmist 7 points 18 hours ago

Oh that's not what he meant at all.

He meant slashing social security and Medicare. Obviously rich people aren't going to feel the pinch.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 113 points 1 day ago (12 children)

This doesn't look good for Elon. Lucky for him that he's the president.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Musk’s earlier target, dismissed as unrealistic by experts, had included the entire discretionary budget of $1.7 trillion.

FFS! There's probably TODDLERS who know more about how the government works than Musk! 🤦

[–] bitchkat@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago

I've always said there were 4 types of people (besides average)

  1. Genius that knows they are a genius
  2. The Genius that doesn't know they are a genius
  3. The idiot that knows they are an idiot
  4. The idiot that thinks they are a genius

The most dangerous one, and the one you don't ever want to work for is #4. That's where Musk is.

[–] fannymcslap@lemmy.world 82 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Gasp. Lying cunt lied cuntily.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] kautau@lemmy.world 44 points 23 hours ago

Sounds like they’re not an efficient use of government resources and should be cut

[–] pastaPersona@lemmy.world 47 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Man, it’s almost like he has no idea what he’s talking about or something. Definitely a good candidate to be making policy decisions affecting millions of people.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 24 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

If allowed, Elon will find trillions to funnel to himself and Trump's cronies however.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 16 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Never fear rich people and corporations - Trump is still going to do another $2T tax cut regardless.

[–] Critical_Thinker@lemm.ee 6 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

It's because they were told they can't cut VA, SSI or Medicare, I promise.

The rich assholes always think they can just cut healthcare and retirement payouts but politicians know they will never get re-elected if it happens on their watch. The old people who rely on this shit are the only ones voting anyway.

[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 18 points 21 hours ago

Ya, so, we're not going to do any of the things we promised. We're just going to try to punish our political enemies and fuck shit up while looting every last penny that we can and running away while the country burns.

[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 41 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Oh? The places he's looking at actually work fairly efficiently already? Or the inefficiencies are outside their control? The inefficient sections are the places he can't go, like the DOD?

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 39 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Any inefficiency likely comes from private industry bending the government over and stealing our wallet. I've been paid obscenely better as a contractor than my government counterparts, and I'm probably only seeing half of what my company charges. Entire departments are twenty contractors at a cost of $5 million per year and two actual government employees making a grand total of $60k each. Maybe double that at most by the time you include all the benefits.

But if you try to trim that, you're cutting into the profits of private industry, and we sure as fuck can't have that, can we?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mctoasterson@reddthat.com 4 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

We did this exercise as a civic learning experience in 9th year government/social studies classes. The teacher had us go through a mock (simplified) Federal budget and decide which line items to cut to achieve a "balanced budget" with debt reduction.

The problem is largely intractable for reasons that become obvious even to middleschool kids. Do you completely cut popular things like the space program? Gut entitlement spending? Massively increase taxes across all brackets? Reduce the military or infrastructure spending to laughable levels? All of those things are very unpopular but that is what it would really take to tackle the problem.

[–] horse_battery_staple@lemmy.world 21 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

You tax the 1% until they're the 10% then shove that money into infrastructure and welfare. Then you sit back and watch the American Exceptionalism machine go brrrr again just like the 50's

[–] itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com 3 points 5 hours ago

The US government is not funded by taxes. Let me repeat that: THE US GOVERNMENT IS NOT FUNDED BY TAXES.

Since the USD is the defacto global currency and is backed by oil, the US can print as much money as it wants to pay it debts or fund government programs. Hence the reason for the US’ constant wars over oil resources. Got to feed the oil machine.

Taxes are used as COLLATERAL for further loans and to pay the interest on the existing government debt.

Money is created by selling bonds and again using the magic of fractional reserve banking to inflate the money supply.

The US is the only country that can pay its debts by printing its own currency.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›