this post was submitted on 07 Jan 2025
60 points (92.9% liked)

Asklemmy

44276 readers
806 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I mean in terms of percentages.

And I don't necessarily mean three full terms. 2.5 terms or 2.1 terms or anything nontrivially more than 2 (like, 10 minutes more doesn't count) would qualify.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] collapse_already@lemmy.ml 15 points 20 hours ago

Trump changes constitution to allow himself additional terms. Monkey paw curls. Obama term 3 confirmed.

I'm kind of hoping Trump kicks the bucket before the end of this term. Keep feeding him hamberders.

[–] nothacking@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

1/3

He's already shown he's willing to interfere with and straight up ignore the results of an electron. He's also willing to use the army as his personal goon squad, and has has support from the other branches. He's also perfectly capable of spinning a narrative that the election was "stolen"

On the other hand, properly executing a coup is hard, and also old: It's entirely possible he dies in office. (of natural causes or otherwise)

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 points 21 hours ago

Yeah next time they go for a coup they need to try bringing weapons. Silly Republicans, always doing coups wrong.

[–] B0rax@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] OmegaLemmy@discuss.online 1 points 1 hour ago

Maybe I should bet on this for once?

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 4 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Metaculus also says 7%.

Fortunately, there's no way something so unlikely as 7% could realistically happen. The odds would be a thousand to one.

[–] Poik@pawb.social 2 points 1 hour ago

X-Com? Is that you?

[–] Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml 68 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Almost zero, but not because I believe in American democracy. I think the techno-fascist machine will grind forward regardless of Trump being in office.

[–] compostgoblin@slrpnk.net 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Exactly. If it wasn’t clear in 2016, it certainly is now - Trump is a symptom, not the root problem

[–] weeeeum@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Democrats are practically shoving the voting base towards trump. Their whole selling point is "saving the system that's starving you".

Trump promised to destroy it, and destroy it he will. Not for us of course.

Same thing happened in 1930s Germany. Nornal parties were just gonna keep things going, while people had to use wheelbarrows of cash to buy a loaf and Hitler promised to destroy it all and make Germany the greatest its ever been.

[–] LyingCake@feddit.org 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You might believe that the following facts are besides your point, but I still want to get this straight:

  • Hyperinflation in the Weimar Republic reached its peak in 1923
  • the NSDAP (the nazi party) got only 2% of the vote in the 1928 elections
  • Hitler rose to power in 1933, after getting over 40% of the vote.

Note that there were 4 national elections between 1930 and 1933. The Weimar Republic was about as stable politically as a house of cards on a trampoline.

It's still true that part of the success of Hitler's party was due to former non-voters losing fate in the established parties, especially in regards to economic policy, but it is not as direct of a connection as your comment makes it out to be.

[–] sylver_dragon@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Hyperinflation in the Weimar Republic reached its peak in 1923

One thing about this, is that inflation peaking or stabilizing does not undo the previous years of inflation. Just because prices are no longer rising out of control, doesn't mean that people's wages suddenly catch up with the price hikes which have already happened. It's part of the reason consumer confidence can lag so far behind top line economic numbers. While the hyperinflation of the 1920's may not have directly caused the rise of the NSDAP, it's lingering effects and resentment caused by it, likely played some role.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

Ya i think people still aren’t seeing that the Billionaire class is why he won. He isn’t pulling the strings he is just the puppet.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago

Exactly, a relevant passage from This Soviet World by Anna Louise Strong

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago

About 50/50. SCOTUS has already ruled that the 3rd section of the 14th amendment to the US constitution doesn't mean what it plainly says, so there's no real hope that they'd uphold the 22nd.

The only reason I place it that low is because he's ripe for a fatal heart attack or stroke.

[–] smuuthbrane@sh.itjust.works 50 points 1 day ago (2 children)

In other words, you are asking whether Trump will find a way, legally or otherwise, to invalidate the POTUS term limit?

I agree he'll certainly try, but unless things turn really poorly over the next four years, I'd say his chances of doing so are really, infinitesimally low.

And I will further predict that the closer he gets to doing so, the higher the risk that he'll be a further assassination target.

[–] themurphy@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 day ago

The man is old af. 8 years is too long either way.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Makeshift@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 day ago (2 children)

After all we just witnessed?

Four years stalling courts and avoiding punishment for insurrection, theft of classified documents, etc.

Getting legal permission to break any law he pleases.

Convincing even democrats that tge constitution, specifically the Fourteenth amendment, means nothing and isn’t worth acting on.

Openly planning the worst possible cabinet.

Not having any investigation or action on votes from targeted minorities get Jim Crow’d away.

No recounts when suspicious vote trends are spotted.

Survival of an assassination attempt.

… Yeah I’m going high. 70% chance minumum if he wants to. He could just order a public hit on the next in line as a presidential act. Clearly no one will stop him.

There should not BE a timeline where he succeeded the second time. The fact that there is implies he can do literally anything he wants.

[–] jimmy90@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

i agree - he can change any law he wants

[–] CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago

I suspect he won't do another two full terms, but not because of any inherent virtue in the system. I think it'll just come down to biology. He's 78, not in good health anyway and about to enter a very high-stress job. If he's still going at 86 I'll be surprised.

And that's assuming the cabal of demented fascists he's assembled around him don't tear him apart the second he shows any sign of weakness or of no longer being useful to them, which they definitely will.

[–] PonyOfWar@pawb.social 33 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'd say like 20%. Not unlikely he'll try but there will be pushback. Also his age and health or an assassin might well get to him first. He might try going for a family dynasty instead, with Donald Jr following him.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 26 points 1 day ago (4 children)

or an assassin

I'm absolutely convinced, between the previous attempts and every single legal issue of any consequence, that he literally is "Teflon Don."

If an assassin actually gets a clear shot, it will somehow bounce off and kill whoever is actually running against Trump. That's the timeline we live in. The joke one.

[–] NineMileTower@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

That already happened except the victim was his supporter.

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

New Trump conspiracy just dropped:

It turns out Trump actually does have a superpower. He can Groundhog Day himself at will. He can create a save state of reality and load it at will. Or he can set up time loop of up to say, 6 months in length. He won the election because he literally ran that campaign hundreds, perhaps thousands or tens thouands of times before finally getting it right. He's save scumming reality. Though, this is also the reason he talks so oddly and is all screwed up. Thousands of subjective years giving political speeches just fries your brain.

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

He’s been using that experimental DoD bulletproof spray tan

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] runiq@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago
[–] HexadecimalSky@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

1% or less.

  1. They probably wont nullify the 2 term limit, can't easily go back and after trump, will there be a democrat monarch?

  2. He wants fame and wealth, he will burn everything to get it. In this term he will burn the most of the bridges with his backers.

  3. His actions will accelerate the victory or death of his backers. Either his backers wont need him or cant back him, so he probably will get waning support.

  4. He may not live until the end of his term, let alone a third.

  5. He is too prideful, he wont bow to being a VP and will pull something that will sabotage the president on ticket.

  6. U.S.A. or the world may be destroyed in the next 5 or so years.

  7. He will try at least 1 coup this term, i'd be suprised if it wasn't more. He will fail and/or drag the nation to civil war in the process. He doesn't have the backing of the army and not all states are under him

For any of these reasons or a combination therof, makes him serving a third term highly, highly unlikely.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)
  1. They're going to install Vance the moment they think they can.
[–] Bazoogle@lemmy.world 0 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I doubt it. Imagine Trump being on good terms with someone after 4 years.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemm.ee 1 points 19 hours ago

As soon as they can would be within the 4 years... They're dumping his dementia'd ass and installing their easier to control puppet, not waiting until the end of the term

[–] Zak@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

10%.

  • Chance he runs for vice president and wins, with the presidential candidate resigning promptly: 5%
  • Chance he cancels or significantly delays election: 3%
  • Chance he successfully refuses to leave office after election using force: 2%

Here are all the ways that doesn't happen:

  • Chance he dies of natural causes: 70% - it's about one in three per year for a man in his early 80s, which would give us 1-0.66^4 = 81% for four years, but he has access to the best possible medical care
  • Chance he runs for vice president and wins, with the presidential candidate promising to resign promptly, and is betrayed: 10%
  • Chance he attempts to cancel or delay the election and fails: 10%
  • Chance he refuses to leave office after election and is removed: 10%

These things have a less than 1% chance:

  • Constitutional amendment
  • Supreme court allows him to run for a third term in violation of the unambiguous text of the constitution
[–] Shdwdrgn@mander.xyz 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Chance he cancels or significantly delays election: 3%

The bird flu is starting to look like it could be a serious threat. Given that he already attempted an insurrection once, I wouldn't put it past him to intentionally turn it into another pandemic, then generously decide that this time he's going to take it seriously and lock everything down in 2028 (while simultaneously banning all states from using mail-in ballots).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Chance he runs for vice president and wins, with the presidential candidate promising to resign promptly, and is betrayed: 10%

For this one, it also depends on how the Supreme Court rules on the 12th amendment. That amendment states that anyone who is unqualified to be president is likewise unqualified to be vice president, but there is some uncertainty as to whether or not it only applies to people unqualified to be president or if it includes people unqualified to run as president.

I'd say 90% chance the conservative-stacked Supreme Court side with Trump because the conservative justices are originalists and the 12th's interaction with the 22nd was not intended when the 12th was written, but 10% chance they decide he's unqualified to be Vice President so as to keep the door closed for Dems who might try the same thing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

1 percent. There's too much they would need to do in four years to not have an election and elections are done by the states not the federal government. So there will definitely be an election. As far as getting re-elected it would take draconian measures for the exact same reason. He'd need 270 electoral votes worth of states to blatantly go against the Constitution.

The only way he remains in office past January 20th 2029 is by refusing to leave and surrounding himself with loyalists. Thus the 1 percent chance. It could work if a million things go exactly right.

[–] Noodle07@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

And him not dying before then too

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 0 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

zero

How do you figure Trump might get some kind of fractional extra term?

[–] SoftTeeth@lemmy.world 6 points 20 hours ago

Usually when fascists want to illegally stay in power they declare martial law or commit a coup.

Since he's already tried to commit a coup we should probably expect him to do it again.

[–] TootSweet@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago

Read the rest of the comments in this post. There are multiple ways he could, theoretically, and it's not unlikely he'll try.

[–] psmgx@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Greater than 50%, mostly due to the complete spinlessness of the greater USian population. People used to riot for less, and often.

[–] Bazoogle@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

There is a lot of land, and a lot of people in the US. Even if we saw people rioting, there would be hundreds of much smaller riots fighting for local rights.

[–] untorquer@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

1/3 normal election with new candidate 1/3 trump dies for whatever reason, probably choking on taco bell 1/3 fascist takeover (though the term "president" may not apply, and it may not be him running things). I think enough dems would flip if threatened with terrorism charges for normal politics being interpreted as protest or whatever other laws originally made in reaction to far right acts of terror.

So imo, 50%, mostly because we have 4 years of extremely uncertain change that can occur.

[–] Noodle07@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Imagine maga nuts storming McDonald's because trump died on a bigmac

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

zero. it would require 2/3rds of the senate and that will not happen. they barely have the house.

[–] Glasgow@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 day ago (4 children)

If they want to do it by the book. Could just say the election is postponed due to martial law and the invasion from Mexico or Canada or whoever really it doesn’t seem to matter.

High chance he dies or goes full dementia in the next four years though. If he were 50 the chances of him stealing another term would be a lot higher. Prob just rig it more than it already is so they can’t lose and pick his successor.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] mo_lave@reddthat.com 6 points 1 day ago

5%. Pray this timeline does not roll a 5 or less in a d100

[–] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Zero.

He has moderate dementia, and will be replaced by JD Vance before the end of his term.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next β€Ί