this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2023
210 points (97.7% liked)

Terrible Estate Agent Photos

6904 readers
1 users here now

Terrible photos listed by estate agents/realtors that are so bad they’re funny.

Posting guidelines.

Posts in this community must be of property (inside or out) listed for sale which contains a terrible element. “Terrible” can refer to:

Rules.

This community follows the rules of the feddit.uk instance and the lemmy.org code of conduct. I’ve summarised them here:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 37 points 1 year ago

'Priced below land value', because the fire-~~gutted~~ kissed structure will cost a shitload to bulldoze and remove.

[–] odium@programming.dev 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

MINIMAL fire/smoke damage

Let me show you what minimal fire/smoke damage looks like

The minimum is zero

[–] Gruntyfish@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] BarrelAgedBoredom@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

3rd base involves kissing, of sorts

[–] HappyMeatbag@beehaw.org 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don’t know why, but that chair makes things so much funnier.

[–] MBM@lemmings.world 14 points 1 year ago

This is fine

[–] Hotdogman@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Lightly-toasted.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

If this is fire kissed, I'd hate to see fire fucked.

[–] mannycalavera 5 points 1 year ago

No way. 🤣🤣

[–] mke_geek@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The studs are probably mostly good and it just needs some renovation. Those who aren't in construction would have a hard time seeing the potential.

[–] skyspydude1@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Okay, I'm honestly curious about this, as I saw another listing similar to this where they said something similar about the studs being intact, and it just seemed like an absolute joke give the house was missing the entire roof and seemed to basically just be the framing, yet was listed for about $200k less than surrounding homes. Just seems kind of crazy to have to have to worry about that and deal with the material and labor costs of all of that plus the fact that it'll be known the house was severely fire damaged at some point. I know basically nothing about the subject, but it's just difficult for me to comprehend that being a better move than just tearing it down and rebuilding.

[–] mke_geek@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Typically when you build with the existing frame, you don't need to re-permit for the framing which will have to be brought up to existing code. So the cost would be less.

[–] paddirn@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Smokey flavoring

[–] kaitco@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

A smokey Cajun taste to the home!

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Cleansed by the holy flame.

[–] fushuan@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

1300 for a burnt apartment? Nutjobs.

[–] Cyber 1 points 1 year ago

This reminds me of our home that was next to a burntout shell.

We had "smoke and water damage" (the flames were in our attic) and that required a year to repair with months to dry out the water, reskimming the walls with new plaster, etc...

Ah, good times

[–] don@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago

Fire ~~kissed~~ fucked right up the ass.

[–] uservoid1@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Mostly dead duplex