this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2024
74 points (100.0% liked)

World News

39332 readers
3174 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Russian President Vladimir Putin signed a treaty with Belarus offering security guarantees, including the potential use of Russian nuclear weapons to counter aggression.

This follows Russia’s revised nuclear doctrine, which places Belarus under its nuclear umbrella.

Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko requested advanced weapons, including Oreshnik missiles capable of reaching all of Europe, which Putin agreed to deploy next year under Russian control.

The treaty has drawn criticism, with opposition leader Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya warning it tightens Moscow’s grip on Belarus and escalates regional security risks amid ongoing tensions with the West over Ukraine.

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 39 points 1 week ago (1 children)

we still pretending Belarus is a sovereign state?

[–] Pilferjinx@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Belarus? More like Believe-it-or-not-Russia.

[–] drbluefall@toast.ooo 6 points 1 week ago

"I Can't Believe It's Not Russia!"

[–] kn33@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

~~Bela~~rus

[–] Idontevenknowanymore@mander.xyz 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Didn't Ukraine have those same guarantees?

[–] pookie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 week ago

It was inevitable with the way things have been going the past few years.

[–] Illegalmexicant@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Nuclear weapons? "You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means"

[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

This is all a show because Ukraine won’t agree to an end to the war without security guarantees. Its preferred solution is to join NATO, but Putin doesn’t want that, so he’ll try to use this deal as an example of Russia “providing security guarantees.” Unfortunately, it’s pretty funny timing though because Russia had also made some guarantees to Syria’s president Bashar Al-Assad, who was recently toppled and Russia couldn’t stop it.