this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2024
202 points (94.7% liked)

World News

39210 readers
3277 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 86 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Hitting London with a ballistic missile would bring the rents down. Maybe this is a good thing.

[–] r00ty@kbin.life 28 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Well it would likely put them up, seeing as it would remove supply but, if you know Londoners you'll know it won't do a damn thing about demand.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

As a bonus, London is no more

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 67 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (14 children)

Please do it Putin. WE want the excuse, NATO wants the excuse, Poland's ~~chomping~~ champing at the bit for the excuse and we really want to see how long it takes them to rush Moscow.

Edit: damn it Lemmy, I'm an engineer not a dictionary.

[–] fan0m@lemmy.world 40 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Pushes glasses in It’s actually “champing.”

Didn't know this, thanks!

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

How do horses "champ" at their bit?

[–] Skua@kbin.earth 24 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Champ is the older spelling of chomp. They mean the same thing. At some point a shift in pronunciation occurred and spelling has reflected that, but the older version has been preserved in the phrase "champ at the bit"

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago

Exuberantly, with a shade of impetuousness

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] baldingpudenda@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Lukashenko: why are there troops with wings sprayed on their vehicles massing near my border?

[–] LouSlash@szmer.info 17 points 1 week ago

Poland: Just a regular training, nothing to worry about

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Which is exactly why he's not going to, and everyone knows it. This is to look strong for his own domestic audience.

The threat that's actually for us is the one about arming it's own anti-Western proxies, and it did indeed make us think twice for a few months.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 39 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Reminder that World War 2 had a gradual unfolding of declarations of war across several months or longer, depending on how you want to fuck that pig. I think we're already in the onset of WWIII, in some sense.

[–] r00ty@kbin.life 33 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The thing is, if NATO is worth anything at all. Hitting a NATO country would bring a lot of declarations in a very short order. It would get very WW3, very quickly.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

Same way you go bankrupt; slowly, and then all at once.

[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (4 children)

That's assuming Europe wasn't economically stretched already, and America didn't have an incoming president who wasn't more interested in fellating Putin.

[–] r00ty@kbin.life 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Even if there's financial concerns in Europe. We DO have reasonably strong airforces, modern weaponry and several nuclear enabled countries. I think it would be a big risk to take in their current position.

My main concern is Trump tries to coerce Europe to leave Ukraine to fight alone. It all depends on how much in Putin's pocket he is.

[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

He's so far in Putin's pocket that he's snuggling up to his nutsack.

[–] realitista@lemm.ee 11 points 1 week ago

Europe isn't nearly so financially stretched as Russia, and its economy is an order of magnitude bigger.

[–] Don_alForno@feddit.org 7 points 1 week ago

Europe hasn't even started stretching. The fact it refuses to is the reason it looks stretched.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Mrkawfee@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

That's terrifying because WW3 risks the use of nuclear weapons and every model of nuclear exchange that has been run always escalates to mutual assured destruction with billions dead and the end of civilization.

I just finished listening to the audiobook of Nuclear War: A scenario by Annie Jacobsen. Highly recommend it.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

The real slippery slopes are graded much less steeply than you'd expect

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Civilization's kinda shit anyway. We had a ~~good~~ run.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (6 children)

I'm not sure we're on a path to WWIII if it's Russia vs everyone else. If China decides to get involved then maybe but I don't see any evidence they're willing to throw in with Putin, same with Iran.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 35 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (14 children)

Russia started the Ukraine war in 2014 by attacking Crimea. Then they escalated the war in 2022 by attacking all of Ukraine.

No other escalations have happened. Claiming that it has is typical russotroll bullshit.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 32 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Blowing up the Brits is a nice olive branch, but I think we'll need more commitment if we want a lasting peace deal

[–] Weslee@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

Please end our suffering (as a Brit)

As a Brit, I approve of this message.

[–] Prandom_returns@lemm.ee 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I cannot wait for the old fart to fart his last fart.

[–] ouch@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Fun fact, gut bacteria continue living for a while after the host is dead. So the last fart will be posthumous.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Just keep rattlin' that sabre, buddy.

[–] blackn1ght 10 points 1 week ago

Dear Mr Putin,

Please don't TARGET BLACKPOOL. It would be a huge waste of a missile as there isn't any SECRET GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS IN BLACKPOOL. Let me be clear, we'll respond with a strongly worded letter if you AIM FOR BLACKPOOL. It will cost us tens of pounds to repair the damage, and we simply haven't got enough money left after giving billions to various government contractors.

Kind regards, Someone that has been to Blackpool

[–] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago
[–] zante@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 week ago (3 children)

This is “threatens the uk” :

“We consider ourselves entitled to use our weapons against military facilities of those countries that allow their weapons to be used against our facilities.”

[–] palordrolap@fedia.io 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

"We consider ourselves entitled to use our weapons against what we say we believe to be military facilities of those countries that allow their weapons to be used against our facilities."

The important unsaid part needs to be in there. Whether an opponent actually puts military installations inside civilian locations or not (generally a bad move), this gives war criminals carte blanche to bomb whatever they feel like.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] UnityDevice@startrek.website 7 points 1 week ago

Oh yeah, it was Tuesday yesterday.

[–] fox2263@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Come on then if you think you’re hard enough

load more comments
view more: next ›