this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2024
287 points (97.4% liked)

World News

39127 readers
3441 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Don't think I need to summarize this one. This is bad news for everyone.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HerrBeter@lemmy.world 3 points 44 minutes ago

B-but the oil lobbyists at COP told me amoc won't be affected

[–] Brown_dude69@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Wait! what???

[–] Bacano@lemmy.world 10 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (3 children)

I gotta stop using chrome on my phone 😔

[–] LordKitsuna@lemmy.world 11 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Firefox mobile supports ublock origin

[–] ghost_towels@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Only on android unfortunately.

[–] SGforce@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)
[–] threeganzi@sh.itjust.works 2 points 43 minutes ago (1 children)
[–] SGforce@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 minutes ago

Two I've had good experiences with are p2.freedns.controld.com and dns.adguard-dns.com

[–] oozynozh@lemm.ee 1 points 3 hours ago

Comite is a good Chromium fork with built-in ad block and privacy features.

https://github.com/uazo/cromite

[–] nucleative@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] modus@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Second that. Or at least use adguard.

[–] Jumi@lemmy.world 31 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Humanity will be just another dead branch on the tree of life

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 12 points 3 hours ago

Humans are pretty resilient. Adaptable to any climate, even the mess of a climate we created.

Now, I'm not saying that all 8 billion of us will survive.

What I'm saying is, the minimum viable genetic population for humans is about 2000 individuals.

[–] Eezyville@sh.itjust.works 58 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

The Earth will survive and the humans will get what they deserve.

[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 34 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Millions of species will go down with us, some already have been relagated to extinction by our actions.

[–] Jumi@lemmy.world 22 points 9 hours ago (13 children)

The dinosaurs got wiped out and new life flourished. The same will happen again.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] El_guapazo@lemmy.world 78 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Basically it's too late to stop the process. Even if we switched to renewables entirely, there will be a lag. That lag is now in a positive feedback loop.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 86 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Yeah like the science community was saying 10-15 years ago.

[–] themadcodger@kbin.earth 32 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

If only we knew about this 50 years ago, surely we would have done something!

Big Oil: side eye Muppet meme

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 9 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Fun fact: They knew since the 1950s and have been lying about it for over 70 YEARS!

[–] anindefinitearticle@sh.itjust.works 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 2 points 7 hours ago

Well, shit.

[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 51 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

I remember some of the early research showing this when I was in college in the late 90s/early 00s. It's mostly following the worst-case scenario models from the time, except 50 - 80 years ahead of schedule.

[–] omgarm@feddit.nl 1 points 38 minutes ago

I started watching The Nanny a few days ago (have seen a lot on tv, but never everything) and in one of the first episodes they make a joke about being worried about Global Warming. It was lighthearted, not very serious. That was 1993.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 19 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Whether you can risk it or can't. Its time to disobey our leaders. They dont care. They've built protections for themselves. They plan on feeding us to the storms.

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 15 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

There will be no protection or escape from the environmental changes we'll be facing, this is not something you can just wait out in a bunker.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 10 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

Yep, they'll let the climate kill all of us. Because they won't truly be living either down there. I'm sure all the training courses for guard loyalty in the world won't actually do shit when you're physically down in a bunker without hopes of coming out.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Icalasari@fedia.io 19 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Huh. That's oddly freeing

"Oh we're all fucked guaranteed. The stress is gone"

I mean, still gonna be for eco measures and such, but it's like a weight is off my shoulders in terms of worry

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 14 points 11 hours ago

It’s not freeing. We may have locked in some really bad changes but it can always get worse. It more critical than ever to get a handle on our green house emissions

[–] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 31 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (3 children)

So, what does this all mean for us? It means we have even less time to get our act together. Reducing emissions isn’t just a good idea — it’s crucial.

I don't think this will motivate countries to dramatically increase emissions reduction efforts, but I think it will motivate countries to begin geoengineering. Geoengineering is cheaper and easier than rapid emissions reduction, and the results are more immediate. Yes, it doesn't solve the core problem, which is the concentration of GHGs in the atmosphere, but it treats the symptom, albeit temporarily. Why put a lot of time, money, and effort into fixing the core problem when you can spend comparatively less time, money, and effort just treating the symptom? Then you can just pretend the core problem doesn't exist and go about business as usual.

Edit: sorry, I should have added the /s.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 22 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (3 children)

I don't think you realize what a collapsed ocean current means for us. This is existential, not business as usual. Anything we do from here on out that isn't in service of stopping this is signing our species death warrant.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 8 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Haha fricking euros enjoying their moderate climate - wait until they find out what’s real Midwest winter is like. And they want to take my truck and my gas stove? Eff them.

/too many conservatives probably

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

I'm way more worried about mean sea level raising above much of our lower elevations. We're already raising dikes, also making them wider so they can easily be made even higher in the future, accounting for the most pessimistic of projections, but you can't really keep water out with dikes when the sea is pushing groundwater up. You can do it like the Dutch but if their pumps ever fail they're royally fucked. Electricity, availability of huge amounts of energy in general, is not something you want to rely on in these matters if you can avoid it.

We're probably going to end up with large areas of salt march interspersed by towns on mounds and a couple of lakes to construct those mounds, the dikes only making sure that they're high, not low, salt marches -- not elevation-wise but regarding how salty they are, how often they get flooded. The alternative would be to give up the marches completely and knowing our Frisians no that won't happen. Barley and sugar beets are naturally salt-resistent, btw, more plants are getting bred for it. Not to mention tasty veggies that allow you to retire your salt shaker

tl;dr: Wat mutt, dat mutt. Imagine Sisyphus happy.

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 9 points 10 hours ago

Ah don't worry, Texas will get Saharan weather in exchange.

[–] Mannimarco@lemmy.world 6 points 11 hours ago

I'm pretty sure that's already signed, let's be real, nothing is going to happen, we're fucked

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ignirtoq@fedia.io 12 points 13 hours ago (6 children)

Geoengineering is cheaper and easier than rapid emissions reduction

I don't know if your whole comment is sarcasm, but every part of this statement is wrong. We are in the very, very early stages of developing the technologies needed for the level of geoengineering required to mitigate what we have already done to the environment. To roll it out to the levels needed would be far more difficult and expensive that converting our entire way of life to renewables, which should really say how hard and expensive it would be given how utterly daunting of a task full conversion to renewables is.

Now, putting in token investment and paying lip service to geoengineering, that's cheaper and easier than switching to renewables. But that's not even treating the symptoms. That's just your standard con game against the broader population to try to manipulate the conversation.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›