this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2024
309 points (98.7% liked)

politics

19118 readers
3019 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Senate GOP leader Mitch McConnell reportedly warned that there will be no recess appointments, directly opposing Donald Trump’s plan to bypass Senate confirmation for controversial cabinet nominees, including Matt Gaetz.

Gaetz has faced allegations of drug use and sexual misconduct.

McConnell’s stance sparked widespread discussion about a looming constitutional showdown.

Critics argue recess appointments could undermine Senate authority and pose national security risks.

Observers question McConnell’s influence, noting potential leadership changes, while others see this as a critical test of Senate integrity against Trump-aligned Republicans.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ptz@dubvee.org 302 points 3 days ago (8 children)

Just a reminder that Mitch McConnell could have prevented this not once but twice.

Good luck (seriously) trying to keep the monster you created and continuously enabled under control. I also hate that I'm implicitly rooting for McConnell here.

[–] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 89 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Don't worry, Trump now will see him as The Enemy and use everything at his disposal against him.

McConnell just might be the first one to draw the ire this term.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 73 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

Don't worry, Trump now will see him as The Enemy and use everything at his disposal against him.

I mean, probably. Unfortunately, McConnell's actually right for once. Whether he's right for the right reasons is irrelevant at the moment.

[–] Xanis@lemmy.world 28 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

The enemy of my enemy.

We can agree with him and root for him. Just keep in mind who he is and what he's done. Don't allow a short memory to curb that perspective.

In the meantime, while the monsters fight we should be collectively working to shore up things in our communities. I'm working on mine.

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago (1 children)

We're still pissing on his grave.

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 10 points 3 days ago

Accidentally right is still right!

[–] DontRedditMyLemmy@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago

Any chance McConnell will fall out a window in the near future?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 71 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Just thinking back to how easy it would have been to never have Trump in our lives again, to get off this worst timeline, if just a handful of people had a tiny bit of courage at the impeachment trials.

Maybe they all thought he was cooked and they could once again forget about doing the right thing one more time, to endear themselves to his rabid supporters. It's dizzying to think they could have protected the Constitution with a single word, and failed to do even that.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 24 points 3 days ago

Stop depressing me with a historically accurate recounting of events that happened.

[–] Stern@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

The impeachment vote shouldn't have been a public ballot. If it had been private I have little to no doubt he'd have been gone the secondtime, possibly the first. Pence was middling but he knows the game.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Pretzilla@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Moscow Mitch took hundreds of millions in Russian 'investments' for I think an aluminum plant.

He's dirty as fuck and just needed a call from his handler to remind him which way to vote on that.

[–] Rooskie91@discuss.online 23 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The good news is in party fighting is s good sign that they won't be able to consolidate power as quickly or completely as they wanted to. The bad news is, they now know who to come for on the night of long knives.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago (2 children)

When the worst guy starts fighting a twice as worst guy, you have a relative good guy to root for.

[–] TrippaSnippa@lemm.ee 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The enemy of my enemy is still my enemy, but I want to see the former hurt the latter first.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Exusia@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

This enemy of my enemy is not my friend, the moment is merely a temporary truce for the greater good.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Bad people can do good things sometimes, and you should never interrupt or shame them for doing it. Many people on the internet forget that.

[–] RedditRefugee69@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 2 days ago

No one is entirely good or entirely evil.

[–] ChocoboRocket@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

Never thought I'd see the day where I hoped a McConnell plan would work in any capacity.

He's allowed Trump to exist so project 2025 can happen.

Moscow Mitch will do anything to make project 2025 happen, maybe he was convinced the "normal" Republicans can mitigate Trump's penchant for treason and sedition against America and that mitigation risk was worth the project 2025 payout.

Hopefully he is right about mitigating Trump. Otherwise, I hope McConnell is the first Republican publicly executed because Trump absolutely wants to be able to publicly execute anyone he doesn't like.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 70 points 3 days ago

If McConnell is saying this then I believe he’s planning on retiring VERY soon. Republicans o Lt grow a spine when their walking out the door.

[–] anon6789@lemmy.world 81 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] whithom@discuss.online 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Please tell me Trump isn’t Bugs.

[–] anon6789@lemmy.world 26 points 3 days ago (2 children)

My take is Bugs is the embodiment of society as a whole, but since Trump is bigger and heavier than Sam, the edge of the cliff will break off and we all go off the edge together.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Sam's hands are to big though.

[–] anon6789@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Should be hamberders instead of pistols as well, but he does look to have the heal lifts. Hell, the hat isn't even too far off from the hair and the face has more orange than fleshtone. It seems to have more in common with him than I first thought....

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] whithom@discuss.online 9 points 3 days ago

Oh, yes. This makes sense.

[–] shittydwarf@lemmy.dbzer0.com 56 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Also McConnell: Votes to confirm

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 13 points 3 days ago

He likes to be in the same room and watch while we all get fucked.

[–] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 49 points 3 days ago (4 children)

The Senate can't turn down too many Trump appointees until they are looked on as an obstruction to their own party. So, you'll definitely lose Gaetz, but Trump has flooded the zone with incompetence.

[–] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 30 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Donnie boy is always testing the waters, testing the limits. It's an extreme version of what the GOPers have been doing for years. Ask for a 150% of what's reasonable, and then act all butt hurt when they only get 125%. We've seen this game before. There's nothing new coming out of the "grand" Old party. smh.

load more comments (3 replies)

Yup, Gaetz and (if the GOP does the minimum of trying to protect this country) Gabbard are the sacrificial lambs to get through Hegseth, RFK and already too many others to count.

[–] Catma@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (3 children)

I am starting to believe the theory Trump is putting up the worst possible people so when one gets rejected he can try to force Congress to adjourn and then appoint whomever he wants which will be 100% worse.

Not that Trump thought of this but someone, Miller, is pulling the strings

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 days ago (5 children)

We can only hope for incompetence, the real danger is a malicious and competent appointment.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Nougat@fedia.io 37 points 3 days ago (2 children)

"Donald, it has to at least look like we gave you some oversight."

[–] JakenVeina@lemm.ee 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Right? McConnel has kinda always been the GOP's fall guy in the senate. The one who takes all the heat for unpopular shit, when the entire party is actually on board. Donny probably just didn't get the memo.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 8 points 3 days ago

He got the memo, but he ate it before anyone was able to read it to him.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 33 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Fair chance that this has more to do with Gabbard than Gaetz. She's close with Russian state media and was put in change of US Intelligence. Obviously a Trojan horse.

[–] Maultasche@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Why would Moscow Mitch have an issue with that?

[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

Mitchell has more loyalty to American oligarchs than Russian ones. The lines are blurry because billionaires are multinational, and once a Russian spends money in his state, they become an American oligarch to him. Similar to Chinese oligarchs like his father in law.

[–] paddirn@lemmy.world 29 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I'll be more stunned if McConnell or other Republicans don't cave and just go along with it.

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 days ago

We live in a world where we're looking for Mitch McConnell to do the right thing? Oh yeah, we're absolutely fucked.

[–] NeoToasty@kbin.melroy.org 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This will mean nothing since McConnell is retiring or has retired already.

Yeah, republicans often find even a microscopic backbone once they no longer are running for reelection. In this case, it probably will be "I said no for a few weeks before I said yes."

[–] sarcasticsunrise@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Polymath probably taking bets on how long McConnell has left before suicide by defenestration+2 bullets to the back of the head

[–] slurpeesoforion@startrek.website 5 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I'm sure people with opinions become more clumsy under dictators. Mitch will probably fall out a window.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cultsuperstar@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

I call bullshit.

[–] ATDA@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Either I see a challenge to a runaway Trump, or I see the death cry of McConnell's political career destroyed by Trump psychopaths.

Silver linings.

[–] IHeartBadCode@fedia.io 6 points 3 days ago

Senate GOP leader Mitch McConnell reportedly warned that there will be no recess appointments

Recess appointments stopped being a thing in 2016 altogether and really the water source was shut off back in Obama who only got 32 as Pro Forma became popular in Congress.

I am seriously doubtful that the House wants to get rid of Pro Forma nor would they risk a Section III dismissal to appease Trump.

As much as Trump is power hungry, so too are a ton of GOP members of Congress equally hungry.

load more comments
view more: next ›