this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2024
152 points (96.3% liked)

World News

39102 readers
2834 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky expressed confidence that Donald Trump’s presidency will hasten the end of the war with Russia, following their “constructive exchange” after Trump’s election victory.

Zelensky emphasized the need for a diplomatic resolution by next year, while acknowledging Ukraine’s challenges on the battlefield.

Trump, criticized for his alleged leniency toward Vladimir Putin, has vowed to end the war quickly but has not detailed his strategy.

The U.S. remains Ukraine’s largest arms supplier, recently approving $61 billion in aid.

top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 143 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What else is he going to say? Fuck the U.S. and fuck Trump?

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 71 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Exactly. While pride from Zelensky would feel great I'm sure, it would come at the cost of many more Ukrainian lives. Best to suck up to the wannabe dictator and hope he's generous.

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 week ago

He's willing to suck up to an asshole for his citizens. It's an excellent mark of leadership.

Could be they need to make sure trump gets something out of it, and he will come around to Ukraine.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 2 points 1 week ago

Surrendering power and appeasing dictators, famous for not backfiring. /s

[–] FarceOfWill@infosec.pub 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The reporting I heard from Michael koffman was Ukrainian soldiers felt they were slowly losing to attrition and needed a change in approach anyway, so this may not entirely be bullshit from zelensky.

[–] SolacefromSilence@fedia.io 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The word from NCD, is that Zelensky wasn't bluffing about the nukes. He doesn't think Putin can radiologicaly retaliate after his generals looted the maintenance budget.

Israel has been taking part in a technology transfer. Any escalation in Eastern Europe takes eyes away from what's going on in the Levant.

Iodine pills all around!

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 10 points 1 week ago

Giving Ukraine a nuclear deterrent may be Netanyahu’s Churchill moment, i.e. one good action made by someone with an otherwise uniformly shitty record

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 38 points 1 week ago

If I was Zelensky, I'd probably agree to a rebuilt Ukraine with Trump Towers and Tesla factories and all sorts of things. "Just imagine, Mr. President, world class Trump golf course and resort in Crimea--- envy of all East Europe!"

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The people at Lemmy.ml are going full brain tapeworm over this.

Meanwhile, I wonder what this truly means. Will the Ukrainians get their people back? Will they get their land back? Will they keep the land they had just before Russia's invasion?

The lessons Putin learns from this will potentially spell distaster. Thankfully, this war has already damaged Russia greatly.

[–] WrenFeathers@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Yeah. I saw the same article posted over there and they’re seemingly marching single-file right in lock-step right up Putin’s ass.

And the copypasta rebuttal links are insane!!

[–] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Sorry Ukraine, but America forgot about you and moved on to the next one, as is always the case. Trump and Putin who are allies of Netanyahu played Americans like a fiddle and got what they wanted. They distracted everyone from Ukraine and created the opportunity for a Trump win, which will help them destroy both Palestine and Ukraine.

[–] random_character_a@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

One of these will happen?

  1. Trump is Putins puppet and US will eventually drop support from Ukraine. Europes support will not be enough and Ukraine eventually falls. Trump tower will be build in Moscow in a decade.

  2. Trump will brown nose Putin. Putin will humiliate Trump and things will continue as is.

  3. Option 2, but Trump dies or is incapacitated. Just replace Trump with Vance or other Republican stooge.

  4. Trump is actually a misunderstood stable genius and war will end with territorial loses that Ukraine can accept.

  5. Russia has an economical collapse and has to pull out of Ukraine, but still desperately tries to cling on Crimea. No peace agreement signed and conflict continues as a confusing mess to far future, maybe stabilizing in Korea style.

  6. Everybody goes nuts and we are all live action roleplaying Fallout.

[–] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 12 points 1 week ago (3 children)

1 is impossible due to Europe's conviction. 2 is inevitable.

I think 5 has some elements of truth, but a full on collapse would probably be the end of Putin. More minor economic problems would probably lead to koreafication around the current front line.

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't think Europe has much conviction regarding Ukraine, unfortunately. Most of the larger EU member states are trying to slow their own Russia-backed right-wing movements but appear to be losing ground by the day. It's only a matter of time before the "appeasement" stance becomes widespread and we end up with a situation mirroring the 1930's.

[–] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think its probably critical that political parties focus on defending against russian agression, even above economic issues or immigration issues. Might be time for unity governments if things start to get bad with the US and Russian fronts.

[–] realitista@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's hard when there's easy points to be scored by saying "why should we spend our hard earned money on far away wars when we can spend it at home on hookers and blow!"

[–] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well, the biggest supporters of Ukraine like the nordics, baltics, and Poland don't see Russia as far way, but yes, that's the difficulty.

It's surprising that even leftist parties like Sahra Wagenknecht have become open supporters of Russian fascism in Europe.

[–] realitista@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

Yet you already have direct neighbors of Russia like Hungary and Slovakia simping for Putin, so proximity to the threat doesn't seem to overcome the tendency towards misinformation and manipulation against your own best interests.

[–] Zerlyna@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

3 should happen soon with all the McDonald he eats.

Scholz (the spineless fuck) has already reached out to Putin.

[–] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Wouldn't nuclear winter help with global warming?

[–] delgato@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

A nuclear winter isn’t a scientific guarantee, many post-cold war models have suggested it might not happen.

That said, shit would get fucked up but for how long and what affects they have on the atmosphere is still debated.

[–] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Wow, I didn't know it was debated. Thank you.

[–] Siegfried@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Well, it would send us all to the middle ages... so, probably yes /s

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So would the collapse of civilization. Neither counts as a win for humanity.

[–] Siegfried@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Fuck humanity, i want to ensure a place for my cats to live in.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

Cats will probably be okay. Their wild cousins are native to desert climates.

[–] SendMePhotos@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Yes but dogs.

[–] Nomad@infosec.pub 5 points 1 week ago

Putin's asset in America will help him end the war while saving face.

[–] NeoToasty@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 1 week ago

Yes, it will indeed end sooner, once Trump's idea of America gives the entire war the cold shoulder and Trump sucks Putin's dick under the table.

It will not be in your favor, this war.

Remember when America tried being up and arms about Hong Kong? Forgotten about. What happened? Hong Kong fell. It'll be exactly like that.