this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2024
381 points (99.7% liked)

politics

19088 readers
4275 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Former President Trump shocked and appalled some Republican lawmakers on Wednesday by announcing plans to nominate Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) for attorney general.

Why it matters: Republican reaction to even Trump's most controversial nominations has been muted so far, but placing the scandal-prone right-winger in the nation's highest law enforcement role is a step too far for many.

"We wanted him out of the House ... this isn't what we were thinking," quipped one House Republican, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to speak frankly about Trump's decision.

What we're hearing: Trump's announcement was met with audible gasps by House Republicans during a conference meeting on Wednesday afternoon, multiple sources in the room told Axios.

One House Republican in the meeting described the conference's response as "stunned and disgusted."

What they're saying: "Gaetz has a better shot at having dinner with Queen Elizabeth II than being confirmed by the senate," said Rep. Max Miller (R-Ohio), referring to the British monarch who died in 2022.

Rep. John Duarte (R-Calif.), noting that Gaetz is under investigation by the House Ethics Committee, said he would be "a compromised AG" and that "there are better choices."

Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) said she was "shocked" by the pick: "This shows why the advice and consent process is so important and I'm sure that there will be a lot of questions raised at his hearing."

Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) said Gaetz has "got his work really cut out for him" to get confirmed.

(page 2) 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 9 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Oh good lord.

You know, it's kind of weird to me that there are republicans stating he won't be confirmed, which, also has me wondering, does that mean he does not have a senate full of Yes men?

Trump isn't going to like that, so I assume they will change their mind after a little private one on one meeting with him.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] djsoren19@yiffit.net 21 points 22 hours ago

Bunch of disappointed losers sad that daddy picked someone else to be his special boy. Disgust would require these shitsacks to have morals.

[–] GreenPlasticSushiGrass@moist.catsweat.com 14 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

In other news, the nomination of Matt Gaetz as AG by Donald Trump has moved the Mitt Romney Outrage Meter from "distasteful" to "bothersome".

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago

How many steps are we away from a furrowed brow?

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 9 points 19 hours ago

Gaetz has a better shot at having dinner with Queen Elizabeth II than being confirmed by the senate,"

Dem senators should help confirm him to help Trump show the nation he wants to burn everything down.

[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 12 points 21 hours ago

No they aren't.

They voted for it and they wanted this.

[–] SarcasticMan@lemmy.world 10 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

No, they aren't. Quit lying.

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 4 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

They might be, right now.

See, there's plenty of time before they actually have to cast a vote. So I'm sure that means Trump will send some mean tweets out about them. And then they'll make the pligrimage down to Mar-a-Lago, bend the knee, say 3 Hail Donalds as penance and promise to insult a brown person on their way out before returning to Washington, DC and voting to confirm him.

[–] obviouspornalt@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 19 hours ago

They're not going to cast votes. This will all be done with recess appointments, and all of these "concerned" senators will "express their concerns" with the exploitation of the recess appointment process and lament that there was nothing they could do about it.

They had really hoped that Mr. Trump would cooperate with the advice and consent process, but what can they do if he pursues the recess route? It really is too bad and all of that.

[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 9 points 21 hours ago

Everybody's surprised that he's picked this guy , but it's because he's compromised that he's picked him.

He has or will have all the shady shit he's done on his desk every morning they have a meeting to remind him what to do.

[–] SkyNTP@lemmy.ml 8 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Elect a clown, expect a circus.

Common guys, we've already been through this.

[–] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 2 points 16 hours ago

No, what we sat through was the pre-show with puppets and clowns. Next up is the twisted, gore-filled main event. They’ve been beating the elephants and starving the lions. There will be carnage.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 5 points 20 hours ago

It's just gonna be never ending laughing to keep from crying from here on out.

[–] m_f@midwest.social 5 points 23 hours ago

Great accelerationist pick, appreciated by both nazis and tankies

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)
[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago

Always thought he looked more like Beavis, myself.

[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago

Outrageous choice.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›