this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2024
132 points (95.2% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35764 readers
995 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I have never heard of Jill Stein until just a few months ago when I saw some article about her on the Lemmy homepage. Then I saw more and more articles about her. However, I don't really know why the media is paying so much attention to her. She is just a third party candidate, right? There are other third party candidates that aren't constantly popping up in the news. So why Jill Stein? I hear its something to do with Russia and a general sense of her goal being to take votes away from Kamala.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 127 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

The Russia thing goes beyond the dinner. She had attempted to (maybe actually has?) meet with him privately. She has also vacillated on Ukraine.

She’s had weird stances on vaccines, food (edit: GMOs), and even energy. It’s my understanding she’s privately invested in fossil fuels.

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 30 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

"Vacillated" is a very interesting way of saying that she's refused to straight-out say that Putin is guilty of war crimes for invading Ukraine and pursuing a war of aggression. Every time she's been asked about it in interviews, she's used weasel-words to avoid coming right out and saying it, while implying that she has said it. OTOH, she will absolutely say that Israel has (and is) committing war crimes in Gaza, and is pursuing genocide.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Nah she does this weird thing where she says Putin is a war criminal but in the next sentence she'll say NATO made him do it.

[–] TriflingToad@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

didn't trump do something similar during the debate too?

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 2 points 3 weeks ago

Honestly? No idea. Didn't watch the debate, because the kind of thing that would make me vote for Trump isn't going to come out in a debate. Would it surprise me, given that Trump is so eager to slob the knob of any authoritarian, like Orban, Putin, or Erdoğan? Not even slightly. Stein at least--and this shows just how goddamn low this bar is--doesn't praise authoritarian leaders.

[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago

He's been talking up his good buddy Putin since his first election.

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 91 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

I'm going to let you in on a little secret. I voted for Jill Stein in 2016.

In my defense, I didn't think Trump had a chance, and I definitely didn't expect him to be as terrible as he eventually proved. I was feeling salty about the DNC not giving Bernie a fair chance in the primaries (how and why, I don't remember) and Hilary just felt like she was constantly condescending and not even trying to earn the presidency. It felt like someone decided it was her turn and they'd just slide her into her rightful throne.

My vote for the green party was official record that they hadn't earned my vote, even though I would never vote for Trump.

I'm sure my one single vote wouldn't have changed anything, but I bet there are plenty of others that felt the and did the same, and still regret it.

[–] AtHeartEngineer@lemmy.world 54 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I'm still salty about Bernie being sandbagged. Not a big fan of how Kamala was shoved in either, but she's impressing me more than I expected, I just hope it's enough.

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 52 points 3 weeks ago

Since she's the VP, it doesn't feel dirty. Joe stepped down, she steps up, that's what we hired her to do.

I just hope it's enough.

[–] Benjaben@lemmy.world 19 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah that was really some trash and made me furious. The one guy just directly stating all the ways we need to help the working class and also saying basically fuck the rich, with the career-long credentials to back it up, and instead we got force-fed Hillary. She was so unlikeable and entitled, it set the Dems (and shit, maybe even women in leadership as a whole) back by like 10 years. Cuz she acted like a shitty stereotype about women that fed right into the misogynists. Such a colossal fuck up, and that really is putting it mildly. I deleted a whole screed of even more forceful complaining, lol.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 19 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm sure my one single vote wouldn't have changed anything, but I bet there are plenty of others that felt the and did the same, and still regret it.

Depends on what state you were in for that election, and how many other people voted for Stein alongside you.

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 39 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Oh fuck.

Trump won PA by half a percent.

Stein got .8% of the votes.

Stein, the DNC, and 50 thousand people just like me, literally handed him the presidency.

I'm SO sorry, everybody.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 25 points 3 weeks ago

Unfortunately, with FPTP and the electoral college, voting for a third party candidate for president is voting in favor of the major party candidate who you like the least.

This isn’t fair, it’s fact. It should be different, but it isn’t. NPVIC and/or RCV are the way out, and voting third party in this election makes those farther away, or wholly unreachable.

[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 3 weeks ago

You can make up for it by convincing all your friends to vote in this election. Help them make a plan, check voter registration, and look up where/how to vote

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au -1 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

You didn’t hand Trump the presidency. The Dems did by not trying to gain your vote.

Never blame yourself for the flaws of representative “democracy”.

[–] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Please, it can be two people's fault. It's Clinton's fault and it's ALSO that guy's fault

[–] frezik@midwest.social 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

But only one of those people gets a book deal.

[–] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 1 points 3 weeks ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Cool. Well, Shill Stein will be giving Trump the presidency by not trying to gain my vote.

See? I’m entitled too!

She didn’t earn my vote by jumping perfectly through my every hoop! So I refuse to vote for her. She didn’t earn it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AtHeartEngineer@lemmy.world -1 points 3 weeks ago

Yep, I wish more people would get this.

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee -1 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

If "ð other choice is fascism" isn't enough, ðen you're eiðer a fascist yourself, or damn close enough for ð sake of ð people who actually have to live wið ð consequences of your privileged decision making.

Some people don't have ð luxury of being able to karen at ð two party system and demand to see democracy's manager to choose to not let fascists get into office so ðat ð not fascists "learn ðeir lesson"

[–] lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 weeks ago

I love þat you're trying to bring ðe þ and ð (back) into English.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Benjaben@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I did similar, I'm ashamed to admit, except slightly worse - I actually just didn't vote at all, thinking I was really making my dissatisfaction clear that way. What a dumbass I was, and for the same reasons you described. And while a lot of that was undeniably true and a problem, I also now feel fairly sure the "don't vote / vote 3rd party" push was an op, and I fell for it like a dope.

I've voted in every election I've been eligible for before and since 2016, and I will never allow myself to drop the ball like that again. Fuck the DNC but we gotta fight like hell to keep things from getting even worse and they're all we've fuckin got at the moment.

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 8 points 3 weeks ago

I voted for Stein too. OTOH, I was in a solidly blue state where there was no real chance that Clinton wouldn't win. And TBH, I'd voted for Clinton in the primaries in 2008, because I wasn't sure if that Obama guy had the experience necessary to be president, since he was a one-term senator. But by 2016, and given the way the primaries ran and Sanders got sandbagged by the DNC, I was done with Clinton.

I solidly blame Clinton and Wasserman Schultz for the 2016 debacle. If Clinton had campaigned hard in PA, MI, and WI, and if Wasserman Schultz hadn't made tipped the scale for Clinton in the first place with the entitlement bullshit, then none of this would have happened.

[–] BaldManGoomba@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Don't feel guilty it depends on where you lived. I voted green party I believe but I live in Delaware and that won't affect the race outcome at all

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

I did the math after someone else said the same thing.

Green votes handed Pennsylvania to Trump.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 63 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Jill Stein is a Green candidate which means she's going to pull left leaning support away from Kamala Harris.

If she pulls away enough people in a handful of states, she could throw the election to Donald Trump.

2016 is a primary example:

Pennsylvania:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_United_States_presidential_election_in_Pennsylvania

Trump - 2,970,733
Clinton - 2,926,441
Difference: 44,292
Stein? - 49,941

Michigan:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_United_States_presidential_election_in_Michigan

Trump - 2,279,543
Clinton - 2,268,839
Difference: 10,704
Stein? - 51,463

Wisconsin:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_United_States_presidential_election_in_Wisconsin

Trump - 1,405,284
Clinton - 1,382,536
Difference: 22,748
Stein? - 31,072

If Clinton had won those three states, Trump would not have been President.

Stein is not the only factor, Clinton had other issues. She badmouthed coal miners which guaranteed a loss in PA and utterly failed to campaign in MI and WI which was not helpful.

But the Clinton fans who can't accept how deeply, deeply flawed Clinton was as a candidate want to blame Stein...

And Putin. There are issues with Stein getting support from both Republicans and Russia, anything to hurt Democratic candidates.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 3 weeks ago

But the Clinton fans who can’t accept how deeply, deeply flawed Clinton was as a candidate want to blame Stein…

Clinton was the worst possible choice. Before seeing the damage that Trump would do, thinking he would be mostly harmless, she made me stay home. I'm voting against that monster just like I did in 2020. The man is a menace.

[–] bamfic@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Nader, bush, gore

[–] 11111one11111@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Why do your figures show a question mark after stein?

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

The question being "What did Stein get?"

[–] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 50 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Here are some of the common complaints about Jill Stein:

As the Green Party candidate she will pull in more third party votes than most (if not all) of the other parties. While those views are usually trivial in number in the grand scheme of things, they can have a big impact in let seeing states.

She has not gone out of her way to criticize Trump, and has instead treated both Trump and Harris as being equally bad, even though Trump is arguably much more anti-environmental than Harris.

This isn't her first time coming in as what's seen as a Democrat vote-spoiler candidate.

From the perspective of some, she pops up every four years to try to take votes off the Democrat candidate and then seemingly disappears for another four years.

She has a bit of a cult of personality thing going on - arguably moreso than either Harris or Biden.

She's in her mid-70s, and so no spring chicken. This has become more of a concern this cycle because a) she's for years older than she was in 2020 (obviously), b) age has become more of a point of concern given how both Biden and Trump have apparently seen marked cognitive decline at less than 10 years her seniors.

There's some evidence to suggest she is cozy with Putin, who is clearly does not have America's best interests in mind. For example, she was photographed at a fancy dinner sitting at the same table as him and several of his 'crew' (among others). The common excuse for this is "she didn't choose her seating!" But equally there's no reason she couldn't have got up and moved or left the event.

Photo of the dinner in question, with labels:

I'm sure there are other points I'm missing. But those are the ones that spring to mind.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

She solely exists so Trump supporters can try to steal votes from Kamala by pretending to be progressive. The US uses an undemocratic FPTP voting system, which means that there can only be two viable candidates at any given time.

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

She certainly captures more liberals and lefties and Trump supporters. That’s why Dems hate her so much

[–] Shotgun_Alice@lemmy.world 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Funnily enough in 2016 I looked into her platform after Bernie was pushed out. And honestly I agreed with just about everything she was running on, except for one thing. She was pushing anti vax stuff and it was enough for me not to vote for her. I feel that strongly about vaccines and public health concerns.

Her intentions is not to be a spoiler, she’s not, she’s filled all the legal requirements to run for office of president and is allowed to be on the ballot. She is just getting a lot of attention in this current race because the margin is razor thin between the two main line candidates and that has people nervous Kamala could lose like Hillary did in 2016.

Personally as an independent voter that feels continually ignored by the by the right and left, third parties can be an attractive choice for some. Honestly, if the left or right want to court my vote they could produce better candidates. Let me say Kamala is a great choice, my issue is how she got there. I feel if Biden had decided to not run for reelection before election campaigning started and allowed other democrats to throw their hat in the ring it would have the appearance of a properly run election cycle for democrats. As for republicans they need to drop trump and his brand of mean spirited politics and have an honest return to the middle right vs where they are now at the far right. Anyways those are my thoughts on Jill Stein, third parties and the left and right. I already did early voting so my choice is done, if you care at all about the direction this country is going or needs to go, GO FUCKING VOTE! FOR THE LOVE OF GOD GO VOTE!

I had that all written and had one last thought. Now I do actually think Stein could spoil NC, she is on the ballot and the person most likely to win the governor in NC also has the last name Stein. A conversation I actually had while standing in line with an aging neighbor, she has a tough time getting around and asked if I’d take her early voting when I was going absolutely not a problem. But in line looking over a sample ballot I had to explain to her that Jill Stein and Josh Stein are not related in any way. So the fact there are two Stein’s on the ballot might make it confusing for some voters. Ok enough out of me, go vote.

[–] Atemu@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 weeks ago

as an independent voter that feels continually ignored by the by the right and left

A party in the U.S. of any relevance that could be described as "left-wing" would be news to me.

You've got a corrupt conservative party and an extremely corrupt "pro"gressive(regressive?) anti-democratic party.

third parties can be an attractive choice for some

Third parties are never an attractive choice for anyone in a first-past-the-post voting systems with two extremely dominant parties, regardless of what any of those parties stand for. The only sensible choice is the (in your opinion) least bad option that still has a realistic chance of winning.

[–] Sundial@lemm.ee 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That's pretty nuch it. Every election cycle has 3rd party candidates. This time it's gotten more attention in the media because there's a good chunk of people, mainly Arabs, who are refusing to vote Democrat as "fuck you" to Harris and her support of Israel.

[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 16 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

If Trump wins, the Palestinians will get even more fucked. That'll teach Harris.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Russian shill trying to siphon votes from Harris so that trump can get an undeserved win.

load more comments
view more: next ›