this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2024
987 points (97.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

5878 readers
3951 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Any Accountability At All Commission

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 86 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Impeachment exists, if only there were a functioning body of government left to do such a thing.

[–] Glitterbomb@lemmy.world 60 points 1 month ago (3 children)

The third political party in the US should be The Woodchipper. You don't vote for candidates, just The Woodchipper. If The Woodchipper gets the majority of votes, all the candidates on the ticket get tossed in a fucking woodchipper and we start the election over with new candidates.

This fixes our problems, in a uniquely American way.

[–] FrowingFostek@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Televise this, just as Carlin intended.

[–] volvoxvsmarla@lemm.ee 5 points 1 month ago

This is, indeed, a more realistic solution for America than, let's say, let the president have less power. Or getting rid of the electoral college.

[–] Huckledebuck@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Who gets to throw them in?

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 23 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)
[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 5 points 1 month ago

They're still bitter about Groundhog Day. I say, let them have it.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 2 points 1 month ago

A lottery is the only fair system

[–] TheRaven@lemmy.ca 53 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Why stop there? Have every President, Senator, and Member of Congress investigated at all times. Whether we think they’re corrupt or not.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I can actually see how that would be a problem.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's innocent until proven guilty, not innocent until investigated.

But yes, it would be politicized immediately. If only there was a way to have bad faith actors run a government smoothly, then we'd be cooking with gas.

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Getting the money out of elections would go a long way. The problem is that more than half the ones who need to choose to get the money out benefit from it.

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Maybe a stupid question, but shouldn't the FBI be doing that?

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 month ago

The same FBI that was dismissed by Trump when they looked into him, even though he was totally guilty? Or the same FBI that told civil rights protestors to kill themselves?

The FBI is the Federal police for crimes the common man commits, not the rich.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 33 points 1 month ago
[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 32 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I remember hoping that Obama would prosecute Bush for all of his crimes, in hindsight it was really naive.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 33 points 1 month ago (2 children)

We JuSt NeEd To MoVe On AnD hEal As A nAtIoN!

.... /Vomit

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Bush was mostly lawful evil. Trump is just a Captain Planet villain.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Is lying about "weapons of mass destruction" in order to convince the country to invade another so the dickbag trio could get more wealthy legal? Cheney, Rumsfield and Bush agree I guess.

Free speech and all would make lying legal, so I guess you're right... Lawful evil it is then :/

[–] masquenox@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Trump is just a Captain Planet villain cosplayer.

FTFY.

Trump is simply not competent enough and never has been.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

He's the fanfic child of Hoggish Greedly and Looten Plunder.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] bcgm3@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Right? I hate that phrase as it's used here. How are we supposed to move on when national traumas are left unresolved?

[–] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 24 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I don't want Trump to win because he's more likely to create a "presidential crimes commission" full of political appointees going after the other party.

We have the legal system, if there are crimes they should be charged. The answer is not some additional political tribunal.

[–] Mr_Blott 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ha ha ha ha your legal system is the laughing stock of the planet

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

glances at Europe

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

We have the legal system

I mean...do we?

[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Judge shopping and legislation via court ruling have called into question the fairness and legitimacy of a once ironclad judicial system. It's being gamed right now by the wealthy and powerful to get what they want.

[–] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

Then the answer is fixing those issues. Saying the system isn't working so we need to ignore it and build out a new system purpose built to prosecute my political opponents is like definitional fascism. We don't need a strong man to fix everything extrajudicially, we just need the law applied fairly.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 1 month ago (3 children)

If we can't even get Trump to stop running despite being a convicted felon, I don't even know if we can catch up with the next fucker. Dude could literally shoot someone on 5th Ave and the government would go "Well, they're the president, what are you going to do about it?"

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Didn't he directly say he could shoot someone and still win the (2016) election? I swear I remember seeing that he flat out said that, I think around the time of the Republican primary debates

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Having convicted felon be able to run for office is a good thing. I don't want a Navalny situation in my country.

An insurrectionist, though? Fuck that noise. Trump should be hanged. He tried to violently overthrow the government.

[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

If they don't remove presidential immunity during the next president's term in office we'll be sitting on a time bomb of WHEN, not IF, a president uses that immunity to destroy our democracy.

I mean, I know we're probably all well aware that this is exactly why the immunity ruling was made and it makes it all the more dire that it be rectified and codified in unambiguously worded law as soon as possible.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

Creating a Department dedicated entirely to Justice.

[–] Chozo@fedia.io 9 points 1 month ago
[–] Hikermick@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Jailing a president is tough. We need to jail their enablers. No president acts alone

[–] Talisker@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Haha yeah the government that’s currently enabling war crimes is gonna totally make a commission to hold presidents liable for crimes.

This is why nothing changes. If you start looking at one of them you have to look at all of them.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

organize and take to the streets (and their pockets) if you want that to actually happen.

load more comments
view more: next ›