I think there's very little doubt that the US was behind the terrorist attack on the pipelines. What's most interesting in my opinion is that there's increasing evidence that the German government is in collusion with the US in covering up an attack on German energy infrastructure. This is nothing short of treason. The government in Germany colluded with a foreign power to cover up an attack on their sovereign infrastructure that resulted in irreparable economic damage to the country.
this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2024
87 points (98.9% liked)
World News
2304 readers
194 users here now
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
very little doubt that the US was behind the terrorist attack
Almost zero doubt imo. Either they did it themselves or they gave the order to someone else and helped them along.
Exactly, and the very fact that German government won't even allow members of the parliament access to the investigation says everything we need to know.
Of course th US was behind it. Biden said he would do it, on camera, to the world. The fact that they tried to blame Russia and people believed that bullshit speaks volumes to our contemporary media. 'the ideas of a society any time are the ideas of the ruling class' to paraphrase
It's absolutely incredible to me that there are people who think it could've been anyone else.
I overheard someone in public recently saying that "Putin blew up the pipeline." Most people who consume very little news, at most state sanctioned news, are completely clueless about the whole thing.
yup...
I knew Americans were really propagandized but Jesus Christ, after these few years I think given enough time the media could get the entirety of reddit worldnews to believe the sky has always been greenm
Whaaaaa?! No way! Who could have possibly guessed!
The article is not entirely correct. I tried to find the article on Politiken they mention, but I couldn't find it. I did find two other articles though.
Looks like Politiken tried to be impartial, but we know that being "impartial" in the West means tacit approval of the dominant narrative.
Calling Politiken "Danish media" is silly, because when it comes to international news, Danish media outlets choose which international news stories to repost/translate/retell. Denmark closed its investigation into NS bombing in February so no news are going to come out of Denmark regarding NS. I don't think Politiken has a journalist embedded in the German security services/police who are the only ones still investigating the attack.
Ignore Danish news. Denmark is one of the centers of Capital, it is a capitalist, imperialist country. A nation of racists led by racists. The ruling "social-democrats" literally copied the foreign policy of the far-right kick-all-immigrants-out party.
Denmark was the one who brought the idea to the EU that asylum seekers should be put in a camp in Rwanda while they await an answer to their asylum application.
Denmark is the country where they designate certain areas of cities as ghettoes, literally ghettoes. The two main criteria to designate an area a "ghetto": 1) more than 50% residents with a non-Western background (1st generation immigrants from outside the West, Muslims, brown people, etc.), 2) large number of unemployed (not sure of the percentage). Ghetto areas have increased police presence where police can stop and search anyone at any time, any fine you get in a ghetto is doubled. It is open class war.
The ghetto law is finally, after years in existence, being challenged in the EU supreme court (Court of Justice) cause the residents of one of the ghettoes are suing the Danish government. A public hearing was planned for the 30th of September of this year. There is no mention of it in the EUCJ press releases. According to [this article behind a paywall] the EUCJ has "opened a case" into it. Whatever that means.
No news anywhere else.
Apparently this is the link to Nielsen's revelations, unfortunately it's paywalled: https://politiken.dk/danmark/art10057566/De-f%C3%B8rste-dage-m%C3%A5tte-havnefogeden-p%C3%A5-Christians%C3%B8-%C2%BBikke-sige-en-dyt%C2%AB.-Men-i-dag-kan-han-godt-afsl%C3%B8re-en-smule
It looks like they talk about the "Ukrainians on a yacht" red herring. At least to me it seems like a red herring. I feel like you'd need more than a yacht, but what do I know about blowing up underwater pipes?
The yacht story was blatant bullshit, the pipeline is at a depth where the divers need to stay in a pressure chamber after their dive. Because otherwise they'd fucking die. Such a chamber is larger than the yacht shown to the public.
Thanks. I'll look into the links in a while, they may come in handy later
This will remain true no matter how much you narrow your definition of "at the scene". Want to define it as anywhere within a few kilometers on the surface? US Navy was at the scene. Want to define it as below the surface, in physical contact with the pipeline at the exact epicentre of the explosion? US Navy was still at the scene.
I'm guessing harbormaster Nielsen and the Politiken editor have found that gas for heating their homes this coming winter is getting to be a lot more expensive than it used to be.