LeniX

The title implies its been creeping into the modern Ukrainian army, which only existed for 33-something years. The "80 years" part may only be applicable to the outside world. It's mixed up a bit here.

Ukrainian fascism was created outside Ukraine

Fascism by its very nature is always an Astroturfed movement. And given the fact that we're talking about a former Soviet republic - it had to be forcefully pushed into the country, with billions of dollars pouring from the Empire's coffers.

Fascism was created in the Western Europe

I wouldn't quite put it like that - reactionary movements existed prior to Mussolini and Hitler - the particular form that was eventually coined as "fascism" was, though. UNR, I would say, were also reactionaries, so were the Whites etc. The point stands -Banderism is undoubtedly a vile child of the West.

This comment is spot on, though. Couldn't agree more.

The only difference is optics. Liberals think it, fascists say it.

Rest in piss you won't be missed

Capitalism is when no food and no teeth to chew food. Got it. Renting teeth when?

Roll credits already ffs

What these "China no socialist" ultras don't have is lack of conceptual understanding of what socialism is. The way they think is brilliantly described by Gabriel Rockhill in his Understanding Siege Socialism appearance, where he actually quoted Mao on this topic. In essence - ultras only have sensory understanding of what socialism should be, but not conceptual - let alone doing any praxis. They don't have a good grasp of dialectical materialism, they see socialism as "being this and that and that" - a set of characteristics that are present (or absent) in a given society.

Conceptual understanding of socialism is the realization that socialism (and communism) is first and foremost a long, painful, tedious and prudently planned contradictory process of consciously building towards a certain type of socio-economic order. It concedes that building socialism, whatever form it initially takes, means that a new society is born OUT OF capitalism and under tremendous imperialist pressure. It does not, however, preclude using different tactics (when appropriate) which may seem to contradict the overall goal or strategy.

No one in their right mind would say the USSR was not socialist, even though the NEP certainly allowed a wide range of private economic activity. Oh, by the way - it never went away fully because for that you have to develop productive forces to a colossal degree. On the other hand, the USSR did have a powerful planned/socialized sector by the time Khrushchev was in power, yet his right deviations and revisionism were obvious to many.

Perhaps it reflects their weak theoretical grounding, perhaps something else (ahem fed ahem). BTW the "global proletariat must rise up" is a big red flag imo (no pun intended). Even fucking capitalists admit China is not capitalist...

"Denazification" isn't just an empty word

The juiciest:

1. "South Korea was created from thin air by US generals";
2. "There is no equivalence between Ukraine and Palestine";
3. "Just how dire is "Israel"'s situation?"

Notable mentions: "How to evaluate a source"; "There is no vaccine against propaganda"

very little doubt that the US was behind the terrorist attack

Almost zero doubt imo. Either they did it themselves or they gave the order to someone else and helped them along.

Thanks. I'll look into the links in a while, they may come in handy later

I’m still a baby ML

A baby ML that imho understands DiaMat and ML better than many ultras. Keep it up, comrade