this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2024
12 points (100.0% liked)

United Kingdom

4108 readers
157 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tankplanker@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Pinning your hopes on tax relief on Hollywood when Hollywood is perfectly fine pushing the absolute limit of whats legal with their finances seems as daft as his carbon capture scheme. Hollywood is quite prepared to cancel or delete even expensively made content because it will make them more money as a tax rebate than with residuals or marketing costs.

Even if they don't out right cancel it, we end up subsidising bombs like the $50m tax break wasted on Ant-Man and Wasp or $55m for Marvels that lost Disney $300m ish.

Giving them more tax rebates is also dumb because you are competing any number of other places for who can be the cheapest to work at with the largest tax breaks, its not a sustainable marketplace. Its much like the countries who offer Nike incentives to come build a factory there.

[–] frankPodmore@slrpnk.net 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] towerful@programming.dev 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Brollywood is an excellent pun.

British Hollywood - a portmanteau.
Brolly Wood - brolly is an umbrella in British slang.

Sorry for dissecting this frog. I just want to make sure everyone can appreciate how delicious the pun is.

[–] frankPodmore@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 month ago

Terrified this will now actually catch on.

[–] mannycalavera 3 points 1 month ago

If we assume that Ingerland is an acceptable spelling of England (and no other nation exists in the UK 😠) then how about Inglewood?

That way we'll be immortalised by 2pac in the same song as Hollywood!

[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

We need more taxation not less of it!

[–] mannycalavera 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

We need a tax system that takes not just the headlines into account but assess the relative benefits of various degrees of tax in various industries and individuals vs what they can or can't contribute back in terms of other economic activity that benefits the economy as a whole.

Simply saying we need more tax (or less if you're Liz Truss inclined) is a, frankly, GCSE level of understanding of the economy and should be discouraged.

[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

We need the wealthy to be taxed more

[–] mannycalavera 4 points 1 month ago

Sure, why not 🤷. Let's go with that. Nice and simple.

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

The tax the wealth that they can’t take out of the country. Bring in land value taxes and start raking in the revenue from all those posh London flats (more properly the land they sit on).

[–] wewbull 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Fact is, if you're not tax competitive in the movie business then production shifts somewhere else. However, a single production can employ thousands of people across a multitude of companies, all of whom pay tax.

What matters is the overall tax take, not the tax rate.