this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2024
506 points (96.9% liked)

Technology

58112 readers
4565 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] noxy@yiffit.net 17 points 11 hours ago

US tech companies too, you fucking cowards.

Facebook paid kids to install a VPN client on their smartphones so they could intercept AND DECRYPT traffic between competing services (like Snapchat, Amazon, Youtube)

facebook and any other company they acquire (or however they try to rebrand) are not only untrustworthy but active adversaries against common decency and basic privacy

[–] squid_slime@lemm.ee 26 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

America selectively caring about privacy.

[–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 11 hours ago

They care about companies they have less control over and a foreign adversary has more control over invading privacy, for reasons unrelated to seeing privacy as a good in itself.

[–] YeetPics@mander.xyz 17 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Is tiktok saying that all Chinese apps that steal our data are also stealing our data because they were designed to steal our data?!

I am SHOCKED.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 12 points 13 hours ago

You don't even need the word Chinese

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 4 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

This thread has made me realize that while I was watching the hearings on it purely for comedy aspect, there were actually people out there being like, "Yeah that makes sense."

Love it when the government takes away our stuff. Please, take away more of our stuff. Love me that security theater.

If you don't like the app, just don't use it. Nationalism is a hell of a drug.

This has nothing whatsoever to do with data security and everything to do with other social media companies lobbying to eliminate a competitor, using anti-China sentiment and fear-mongering as a justification. It's all about the money.

[–] huzzahunimpressively@lemmy.world 7 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

What about Lenovo, Aliexpress, Xiaomi, Didi (It's famous in latam), BYD, NIO?

[–] archomrade@midwest.social 6 points 11 hours ago

Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Reddit....

[–] aaaaace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 56 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

It's time to start taxing the acquisition, retention, and selling/trading of personal data.

Actually, that time was 40 years ago.

[–] Blackmist 6 points 13 hours ago

GDPR is a start, but we need to actually ban it, not just annoy people until they click Accept at the 20th popup of that tantalising offer to share your details with 1473 trusted data partners.

[–] TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.world 15 points 17 hours ago

Google and Microsoft would be scrambling to pay off every single person associated with that before it ever hit the first courtroom floor.

[–] Cataphract@lemmy.ml 9 points 18 hours ago

ohhh data collection taxation, I like it. You would think it would be a no-brainer but look at marijuana taxation and the continued resistance to rake in all that public funding. Would make most of the controversy around AI disappear if they tax it's collection.

[–] AceFuzzLord@lemm.ee 3 points 10 hours ago

Good call. Let's ban them both.

[–] Letme@lemmy.world 6 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Fine then, ban all the Chinese spy apps

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 7 points 12 hours ago

I'd rather they just ban spy apps in general...but that's a "dream a little dream, it's never gonna happen" type of thing.

[–] Blackmist 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

And all the CIA ones.

And then block all cookies and tracking.

[–] NocturnalEngineer@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

"I felt a great disturbance in the Force, as if millions of voices suddenly cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced."

[–] x00za@lemmy.dbzer0.com 60 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

"Good point, we'll ban all of them"

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 21 hours ago

"Thanks for bringing it to our attention. You are now banned as well"

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

You can't spy on our citizens, that's our (and our corporations') job!

Signed, the US Government

[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 21 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Like Temu?

You mean like facebook and twitter.

[–] TheDarksteel94@sopuli.xyz 14 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

No, they love those, since that data goes to the US government instead of to the CCP

[–] kelargo@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago

Cambridge analytics

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 12 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

that data goes to the US government instead of to the CCP

Going to blow people's minds when they find out Temu data also goes to the US government and Facebook data also goes to the CCP.

This shit is just a commodity. It's auctioned off at the bid rate. The NSA doesn't just lay claim to this data, it buys it. And these Big Data companies are only handing it over because of the absurd margins NSA (and MI5 and the rest of the Five Eyes) directors are willing to pay.

Your data isn't any safer because the parent company is owned by a foreign plutocrat. This is a big club and you ain't in it.

[–] TheDarksteel94@sopuli.xyz 3 points 16 hours ago

Oh no, I'm not under any illusion that my data is safer with any of them lol. I'm just saying that that's why the US doesn't ban American social networks/companies. Because it's all about control.

[–] TheFrirish@jlai.lu 15 points 20 hours ago

Please ban them, I beg of you, please...

[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 21 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

They're right, we should regulate or ban then too.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 8 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Technically, the second partof that bill bans sending user data to China for all companies, so it's foreseeabke that they get fined into the dirt if nothing else.

I hope the Facebook multi-billion dollar fines act as precedent.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

it’s foreseeabke that they get fined into the dirt if nothing else.

Or they just route the sale of traffic through a domestic data broker and buy "analysis" on the Chinese side of the legal fence. There are so many badly policed and underregulated aspects of the data business that this shit never amounts to more than publicity stunts.

American trade with China only ever increases year-to-year, despite all the noise about a Trade War. Chinese based drop-shipping schemes only ever eat into our domestic market share, because American incomes are falling into line with the global average and that's the kind of trade good international middle class workers can afford. And all this shit is getting blended together - Indian and Chinese businesses outsource to Indochina and Malaysia and Indonesia where labor is cheaper. Everything gets routed and flagged through Singapore anyway, so the real origin of a good is obscured by the time it lands on your doorstep. And nobody in the business of making money wants to pay a politician to do anything about this in practice.

Nobody is getting fined, much less into-the-dirt.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 6 points 17 hours ago

Or they just route the sale of traffic through a domestic data broker and buy “analysis” on the Chinese side of the legal fence. There are so many badly policed and underregulated aspects of the data business that this shit never amounts to more than publicity stunts.

That is literally what Facebook was fined for, BEFORE the new laws were put in place. Cambridge Analytica did what you just described.

[–] Ilandar@aussie.zone 74 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I'm surprised so many people think this is a good argument. TikTok is a social media platform. Temu is an online marketplace. The potential to cause disruption within US society is completely different.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 46 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Legally it is a very good argument. A law targeting a single company in name or effect is literally unconstitutional. It's called a "Bill of Attainder".

The counter argument is indicting Facebook because they never stopped selling information directly to the CCP.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

Cool, let's ban Temu then. Nothing of value will be lost.

In all honesty though, I disagree with banning software, and that includes TikTok. I think it's a terrible platform and I refuse to use it, but I think we need to solve the underlying problem another way, otherwise we're just picking and choosing what speech is allowed in this country. The Constitution doesn't only protect American citizens, it protects everyone.

That said, if we're going to ban one, let's ban them all. These apps haven't provided any tangible value IMO and they've arguably caused a fair amount of harm, so I'm not going to die on a hill defending them.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 6 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (11 children)

A US Citizen might be protected by Article 1 Section 9, but courts have adopted a three-part test to determine if a law functions as a bill of attainder:

  1. The law inflicts punishment.
  2. The law targets specific named or identifiable individuals or groups.
  3. Those individuals or groups would otherwise have judicial protections.

And unfortunately for the CCP they fail #3 unless the Chinese owners divest and all Chinese centralization for the company gets shut down.

Also, the tiktok ban was passed alongside a bill outlawing sale of data to China, Iran, Russia, etc. So if FB is still selling to China it is also illegal.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DahGangalang@infosec.pub 171 points 1 day ago

Oh no, now we have to ban them all?? What a shame!

/s

[–] potentiallynotfelix@lemdro.id 89 points 1 day ago (2 children)

But you can't charge me with murder! That guy committed it too!

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The argument here is more along the lines of, "you can't make a law that defines something as murder only when I do it."

[–] WldFyre@lemm.ee 0 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Good thing that's not what's happening, then.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 0 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

No that's exactly what's happened.

[–] WldFyre@lemm.ee 0 points 9 hours ago
[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 47 points 1 day ago (3 children)

selective enforcement of the law is a real issue. One of the reasons Donald Trump will likely never go to jail is the failure to prosecute nixon, reagan (iran contra, iran hostage crisis meddling), and Bush/Cheney(wmd fiasco)

[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 11 points 19 hours ago

And one of the reasons POC are more likely go to jail (or even gets shot) for something a white man would be let free with only a warning… At least in the “free” land.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›