this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2024
301 points (97.8% liked)

politics

19089 readers
4193 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MajinBlayze@lemmy.world 146 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

"It's just a fact of life" he says in only country where this happens regularly

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 90 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I wonder how other countries deal with this fact of life

[–] darklamer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 2 months ago (1 children)

What makes you think that other countries are real?

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 22 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Well apparently I'm actually in some sort of Truman Show dome.

Australia Doesn’t Exist

And y'all know about the so-called "gun laws" here and how swiftly and easily everything got changed. Seems too good to be true 🤔🤔🤔🤔

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

Sounds fake, I'm gonna need another mountain of needlessly dead children to find out.

This place is fucking stupid.

[–] CTDummy@lemm.ee 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

No, according to types like Vance, you live in an oppressive hellscape worse than any on the planet.

I ended up on a YouTube video of an officer involved shooting in QLD. The amount of comments gleefully exclaiming “but I thought Aus outlawed all guns?”, “lucky guns are illegal there” and further carry on about all the laws “forcibly” being brought in doing nothing. The amount of comment saying it was retribution for covid lockdown (lmao). This country doesn’t exist except as a political talking point to some of those types.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago (2 children)

19 Countries with the Most School Shootings (total incidents Jan 2009-May 2018 - CNN):

United States — 288

Mexico — 8

South Africa — 6

Nigeria & Pakistan — 4

Afghanistan — 3

Brazil, Canada, France — 2

Azerbaijan, China, Estonia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Kenya, Russia, & Turkey — 1

Source

Other countries just have less to deal with.

[–] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

We're #1! We're #1! We're #1!

-Americans probably

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Wait til you look at homicide by firearm and realise that the US is more dangerous that some countries in active war.

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 88 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Fuck JD Vance. That is all.

[–] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Look, I know I have nice warm cushion-like fat, but I’m not a couch.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 44 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Trump had multiple agencies on site providing security when some loon climbed up and started shooting. Said security even spotted him but jumped away rather than engage the shooter. Trump's head almost got blown off during what is arguably one of the best case security scenarios.

Do with that what you will, JD.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Trump's head almost got blown off

There but for the grace of Satan..

[–] TheDeadHorse@lemmy.world 38 points 2 months ago (3 children)

So he's unequivocally stating that there is nothing he plans on doing to reduce the killing of children. If you support no action, this is the guy you should support.

[–] Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago (2 children)

In the article he calls for bolstering security at schools. Which I always find funny because what if.... And this is a wild idea... But what if there's a shooting at a location other than a school? Not to mention that studies have shown that the presence of armed guards in schools doesn't actually do much to deter shootings.

[–] dharmacurious@slrpnk.net 8 points 2 months ago

Why would armed guards have an impact? These kids that plan on shooting up their schools are planning it as a suicide mission. It's a super elaborate suicide by cop, taking out as many of their classmates and tormentors, perceived or otherwise, as possible. Armed guards aren't going to help. Stricter rules on guns and mental fucking health care might, but that would be actually doing something that the vast majority of Americans support, and we can't do that. If we let people think overwhelming support for something gets it then they may get uppity and start demanding other things, like unions and healthcare

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JoeyHarrington@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 months ago

Guns have more rights than our children

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

So he’s unequivocally stating that there is nothing he plans on doing to reduce the killing of children. If you support no action, this is the guy you should support.

Remember, after one of the other school shootings (The fact that I cannot remember which one is itself a telling statement, isn't it?), one of our wonderful elected officials literally stated that they were going to do nothing about it.

[–] Hobthrob@lemmy.world 33 points 2 months ago (2 children)

If all children of American politicians were legally required to attend public schools and integrate into common classes I think we’d see sweeping implementation of gun laws real quick. Might also force them to improve the quality of public schools.

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

They might get to that. Only after they:

  • Remove all "objectionable" books from schools so their kids don't learn that black or gay people exist
  • Institute religion, morning prayer, the bible, etc. back in schools
  • Gerrymander the public school district to make sure the black/gay/poor kids aren't attending the same schools as theirs. Sure, those kids can have the opportunity to attend schools not in their neighborhood under state "school choice" laws, etc. but golly gee darn the waiting lists are years long, dontchaknow.
  • Ensure that their children are attending the newer public schools that have more robust security measures while the rest of the district are still going to school in buildings that were built when things like electricity were still an optional luxury and modern security would be nigh-on impossible.
  • If all else fails, they will hire private home tutors.

I will bet the left body part of your choice that all of those things would happen long before they actually did anything to try to improve the quality of the schools. Remember, half of these people are about to vote for a candidate who says the department of education shouldn't exist. They'd destroy the entire system before they'd try to improve it.

Remember the saying "If conservatives become convinced that they can not win democratically, they will not abandon conservatism. They will reject democracy." The same thing applies here, except it's the public school system.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 22 points 2 months ago (2 children)

These guys would gladly have your child shot to preserve their money. How they can live peaceful lives in a country of 330 million people is beyond me.

[–] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Simple. They use that money to send their kids to private school where this sort of thing would never happen. Their kids are safe, and they get votes and money from gun owners. That’s all they care about.

[–] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

Where the privatr school kids are exempt from having to fill out military aptitude tests...unlike public schools

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Yeah bruh, i think you ain’t picked up what i put down. But it’s cool, though.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 months ago

"Would"? They have been doing it for decades.

[–] civilfolly@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Why don’t they just arm all the kids?

[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago (2 children)

They've already got 2 arms. You wanna give them more?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago (1 children)

"No Way to Prevent This," Says Couch Fucker From Only Nation Where This Regularly Happens

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago (3 children)

The Ohio senator was asked by a journalist what can be done to stop school shootings. He said further restricting access to guns, as many Democrats advocate, won’t end them, noting they happen in states with both lax and strict gun laws. He touted efforts in Congress to give schools more money for security.

I always find this weird because it just completely glosses over the possibilities of A) the restrictions not really doing anything/enough, B) the incredible ease by which someone can just... Go to another state, and C) how absurdly easy it is to purchase firearms in the secondary market.

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

they happen in states with both lax and strict gun laws.

Can he back that up with a reputable source?
Seems he is full of weird shit.

[–] TonyOstrich@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

His argument isn't even a valid/honest one. Take Illinois and Chicago specifically. They have stricter gun laws, but when a gun store in Indiana is just a 20-30 minute drive away those restrictions don't do much because of how close by a place with lax laws is.

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Well, he has mastered the Trumpian art of finding a way to be wrong even when he isn't wrong.

He's right in that more anti-gun laws that are largely toothless and/or performative won't do jack shit. Of course, the reason for that is that the genie was out of the bottle decades ago. There are just simply too many guns out on the streets already for any kind of anti-gun law to be even remotely effective. If the first two steps of the process aren't "Reduce the amount of guns currently out on the streets" and "Prevent new guns from made available to the public", then everything else you try to do will be nothing more than a complete waste of time.

Notice how all the laws that have been passed to combat school shootings with AR-15s have done exactly nothing to stop school shooters with AR-15s. There's a reason for that.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ThePantser@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Security will be automatically better if there are less guns.

Less guns > Security

[–] evidences@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

Whoa there pardner, the only thing that stops a bad toddler with a gun is a good toddler with a gun.

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago (5 children)

It's only a fact of life if people like Vance let it be. There is more than can be done besides turning schools into fortresses and thoughts and prayers.

Oh look... another school shooting today.

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There is more than can be done besides turning schools into fortresses and thoughts and prayers.

I have almost 20 years of experience working in the public school system. You know those "fortresses"? They're also for show. Unless you're literally putting every child through a metal detector individually (which would take way too much time), any student can easily sneak a weapon right in their backpack. Schools simply do not have the time or resources to be checking every individual student every time the metal detector goes off, assuming they have one in the first place. Those bulletproof windows don't do shit when the shooter is in the building already. And any adult can socially engineer their way to access by simply claiming to be a parent, vendor, substitute teacher, or whatever. I have been to dozens of districts. The number of "fortresses" that could effectively stop a school shooter is exactly zero.

Give me a public school building anywhere in the country, and I'll show you ten ways that all of your security measures will do exactly nothing. I will bet large sums of money on it.

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Oh absolutely, it is security theater. I did not mean to suggest that turning schools into fortresses was a valid solution, it's just the only solution being offered up by people like Vance.

[–] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Yeah, I apologize. That came off as more argumentative than I intended. I wholeheartedly agree with you and was just trying to show the absurdity of the suggestion that turning our schools into fortresses would do a damn thing. Not only is it political theater, it's a logistical, financial, and educational impossibility and any attempt at doing so could be easily thwarted in seconds in about 10 different ways.

I mean for the love of God, a shooter could just it in their car across the street and fire into the schoolyard during recess, or when kids are coming to/leaving school. I don't care if the school is built like ADX-Florence. You ain't stopping that. There will always be a bottleneck that can be exploited.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] iamtrashman1312@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

"It's a tragic day, four days into the school year," Gahler said at a news conference.

Fucking grim

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Myxomatosis@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

JD being a couch-fucking weirdo is a fact of life as well.

[–] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 months ago

Yeah that worked real well in Uvalde while they all stood in the hall for a couple of hours.

[–] Westdragon@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Somehow I get the impression his idea of "better security" is the local team of Gravy Seals patrolling campus looking for "trouble". Trouble being minorities, girls, kids who look at them funny. That kind of thing.

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Not that you would ever want to live in Mexico but:

Between 2004 and 2024, Mexico has recorded 17 school shootings, while the United States has experienced a staggering 288 school shootings from 2009 to 2018 alone, with the U.S. averaging over 87 incidents annually. The disparity is significant: the U.S. has seen over 57 times the number of school shootings compared to the combined total of the other G7 countries during the same period. In contrast, the school shootings in Mexico have generally resulted in fewer fatalities, with most incidents resulting in zero to two deaths. This stark difference highlights the severity of gun violence in U.S. schools compared to those in Mexico, where school shootings are less frequent and often less deadly. The motivations behind these shootings also vary, with the U.S. incidents often linked to mental health issues, bullying, and a desire for notoriety.

https://www.perplexity.ai/search/for-journalism-how-many-school-d7tCaQlBQ1W9yLVyFxmy_A

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Japan had zero. France, Germany, Canada, and Finland each had more than two public mass shootings from 2000-2022, far fewer than the U.S. The U.S. accounts for 76% of public mass shooting incidents and 70% of victim fatalities compared to 35 other economically and politically similar countries, despite making up only 33% of the combined population.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Somehow this only happens in this country. That's weird.

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Ah, yes. Let's treat the symptom and not the cause...

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›