this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2024
84 points (90.4% liked)

WTF

791 readers
1 users here now

The average c/WTF enjoyer

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] scytale@lemm.ee 54 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I understand they are trying to avoid the risk of potentially introducing foreign flora/fauna into the country, but the airline really should've announced to passengers before deplaning that they can't take the in-flight food with them.

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 53 points 3 months ago (1 children)

And customs should be waiving the fee, given the passengers were basically entrapped by the airline. A simple "hey we need to confiscate those apples, then you're free to go" would have made this a non-issue.

[–] starchylemming@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago

yeah they are the real fuckwads here

[–] RecallMadness@lemmy.nz 18 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

If you’ve ever flown into New Zealand, you will know there are numerous signs and warnings that bringing any organic produce into the country is illegal and will be met with fines.

If you declare it, they’ll just take it off you and let you go. Don’t declare it, you get a fine.

It’s not hard. Unsure? Declare it.

[edit] But also, Quantas are in the wrong here. They’re an Australian airline, and Australia has similar biosecurity laws. The fact they served their customers fruit, and didn’t inform them is poor form.

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 15 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

So if eating the apple whilst still on the plane makes it legal - does it fall under that same description/distinction if I shove it up my ass instead? Does the law cite this particular case?

Asking for a friend.
Unrelated, if anyone knows a lawyer specialised in butt apples, pls let me know. Like asap.

[–] meldrik@lemmy.wtf 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Wouldn’t that be smuggling? 😂

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

But they accuse people of smuggling also when they eat the contraband.

[–] kjaeselrek@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I dunno, some people are pretty weird.

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Hey man don’t kink shame

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

You can shame Apple people a little bit, as a treat.

[–] Confused_Emus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 months ago

No, because digesting the food eliminates the concerns they have over the fruit in the first place.

[–] z00s@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Glad to see Qantas engaging in the ol' Aussie pastime of fucking with the kiwis

[–] norimee@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago

But its not the kiwis who have to pay a $200 fine. That's a lot of money for a lot of people and can absolutley ruin your trip.

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago
[–] RageAgainstTheRich@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Where he says "its not that big of a deal." Bro its 200 bucks... that is almost a month of groceries for me.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Reason #83773 to never travel to Australia, though it is the first reason I've had that isn't based on a risk of death LMAO

[–] boogetyboo@aussie.zone 10 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I think the main reason you're not going to Australia is because you don't seem to know where or what it is.

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

No. That's reason #593

[–] PDFuego@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Auckland isn't in Australia

[–] cm0002@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Oh oops, I could have sworn I read Australian Dollars lmao