this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2023
349 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

59308 readers
4851 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

IBM selling The Weather Channel and the rest of its weather business::IBM will sell The Weather Company to Francisco Partners, a tech-focused private equity firm, for an undisclosed sum, it announced Tuesday.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 181 points 1 year ago (6 children)

In before a fascist wannabe billionaire buys the weather channel just to destroy any credibility it has and hijack the climate change debate. Even change the name of weather channel to something like “Y”.

Let the enshittification begin.

[–] Snowyday@startrek.website 58 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You reminded me of this story from 2018 when the Trump team tried to put someone in charge of government weather data so that they could shutdown free public access, allowing private companies to use it and commercialize it

“ One particularly alarming thread explored in Lewis’s reporting follows the ongoing efforts of Barry Myers, the chief executive of AccuWeather and Trump’s pick to run the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, to privatize the agency’s practice of collecting and analyzing data that helps generate weather warnings meant to keep all of us, and not just those who can pay for it, safe.”

https://www.vulture.com/2018/07/the-coming-storm-michael-lewis-audiobook-review.html

https://qz.com/1341347/michael-lewis-audiobook-the-coming-storm-is-public-weather-data-at-risk-of-privatization

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

God he sucks. Why don't we do private firefighters and police while we're at it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 38 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Steve Bannon is sadly already ahead of you:

The two networks’ shared ownership has alarmed some meteorologists, who say that WeatherNation is helping to legitimize the extreme viewpoints aired on Real America’s Voice, occasionally sharing its forecasts on the political network; at times the networks feature the same advertisers. These critics also argue that in its own coverage, WeatherNation fosters climate change skepticism by shunning any mention of the established links between human-driven climate warming and the disasters the channel covers, thus discouraging viewers from considering the consequences of climate change

https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-environment/2023/02/20/weathernation-real-americas-voice-bannon/

If paywall:

https://web.archive.org/web/20230221114035/https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-environment/2023/02/20/weathernation-real-americas-voice-bannon/

Another article with tons of linked sources: https://checkmyads.org/branded/how-proctor-gamble-ended-up-funding-steve-bannons-war-room/

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I've watched WN on a regular basis since 2014. That's the year I cut cable and WN was the only streaming option I could find. I was also sick of The Weather Channel and the non-stop drama being pumped out of their studios.

WN may or may not be linked with RAV / Steve Bannon but I simply don't care. They do weather and that's it. It's on when I want (always), gives reasonably accurate predictions, and there is zero political BS or unnecessary drama.

The article has it correct, the WN is basically a modernized version of TWC from two decades ago and that's all I need / want it to be.

We can talk about GCC, I'm no denier, but I don't need to be having that conversation while I'm trying to find out what today's weather is going to be. If refusing to put GCC coverage front and center is wrong then every weather app on every smartphone in America is guilty of the same thing.

[–] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He'll probably rename it to 🌦️

[–] ech0@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

*Databases crash noises

[–] Mateoto@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

This timeline is disturbingly absurd, making it increasingly likely that we could indeed face such a situation.

[–] DoomBot5@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Too late, it's been shit for years now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] adenoid@lemmy.world 57 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

Same firm that acquired LogMeIn (LastPass) and MyFitnessPal--and after those acquisitions both MyFitnessPal and LastPass quickly moved to worsen the free tiers of services in favor of their paid subscription models.

[–] kmkz_ninja@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That's incredible. Both of those apps INSTANTLY became so much worse after they were bought out.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] jet@hackertalks.com 55 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Why on earth did IBM buy the weather channel?

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 58 points 1 year ago

Data, probably.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ironcrotch@aussie.zone 54 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I used to love Weather Underground but stopped using it once The Weather Channel took over but crazy that IBM own that, what an odd acquisition.

[–] Ejh3k@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I still use it, mostly because I've been using them for nearly two decades and they've been the most consistently accurate in forecasting for my area.

But since the IBM acquisition, the app has been so slow to load.

[–] Patches@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Just use the National Weather Service. It is where they get all of their data. They just bundle it up and sell it.

https://forecast.weather.gov/MapClick.php?CityName=Gainesville&state=FL&site=JAX&lat=29.6742&lon=-82.3363

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Weather that is a good decision or not remains to be seen

[–] drexy_rexy@programming.dev 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What is your forecast about it?

[–] figjam@midwest.social 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Cataphract@lemmy.ko4abp.com 4 points 1 year ago

Hail of a good pun line going on.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Please don't make Weather Underground shitty. It's the only weather website that gives accurate information around here.

[–] unwillingsomnambulist@midwest.social 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hate to tell you this, but it’s been shitty since the NEXRAD feeds broke and they never bothered to fix ‘em.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe for you, but all the other weather websites I've tried are wrong. Even DarkSky was wrong half the time. It said sunny skies when we were in the middle of a blizzard once. I don't know, maybe there's something weird about where I am.

[–] unwillingsomnambulist@midwest.social 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I had a similar experience with Dark Sky, but Weather Underground was always great. The weird part of it is that I’m near Chicago, where the NWS office got trashed for their awful handling of the forecast and response to the storms that led to the Plainfield F5 in 1990 - bad radar was often cited as a reason for that response, so NEXRAD especially has been key to NWS’s improvement here.

It’s www.weather.gov/lot for me now.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Oh wow, weather.gov looks really nice these days. It used to be bare bones. I may use it from now on, thanks!

Edit: The only thing I don't like is I can't see where it has the current heat index.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Elegast@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If only their UI wasn't so trash I'd only ever use weather.gov

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] doubletwist@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

They've been shitty since TWC bought them. Maybe a little before when they killed their old web interface which was informative and fast and replaced it with a new design that was difficult to read information, and worst of all, slow as fuck. That's about when I stopped subscribing.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] worsedoughnut@lemdro.id 19 points 1 year ago

Maybe the Wunderground KDE plugin will be revived now that IBM isn't the one handing out API keys...

[–] BlackSpasmodic@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Today I learned that IBM is still a major thing

[–] ABeeinSpace@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

IBM will still sell you a brand new, updated mainframe in 2023.

They’re also in the open source software space (IBM owns Red Hat, a software company that has a lot of projects for Linux. Red Hat has their own Linux distro too)

[–] umami_wasbi@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Which threats users to had their subscription cancelled when they share the source code according to GPL.

[–] ABeeinSpace@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Yeah. I agree with ya there, Red Hat screwed over Alma and Rocky with that decision. I can see the utility of those two distros for testing before committing to RHEL.

Plus, if Oracle has room to try to be the “good guys”, you’ve really screwed up

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] hglman@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 year ago

We did away with that pesky business failures. Now all corporate are eternal.

[–] agent_flounder@lemmy.one 4 points 1 year ago

I knew they were a thing because I run into them in IT from time to time... but had no idea they owned the weather channel. Wild.

[–] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I work with their iseries servers daily, they are very much still a thing

[–] finickydesert@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Does anyone know of a great alternative weather app?

[–] to55@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Makes sense. Now they can focus more on their core business. Google recently sold it’s domain registry, I think it might be the same thing.

I think it’s fair to look at IBM with a more cynical eye. Historically it’s been “acquire, way you’ll make no changes, wait a bit, make changes that piss off 80% of your customer base.” Somewhere in there is a “reduce customer service effectiveness” step that is distinct from “make changes.”

After that it’s either “sell it off to the highest bidder” or “keep at it because who else are the customers gonna use?”

[–] umami_wasbi@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It's a bummer that Google sold it's registry to ~~GoDaddy~~Squarespace.

EDIT: seems like I remember it incorrectly

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I hear this a lot, but every company I've been a part of that did it seemed to be a bad idea. If a division makes money, the only reason to sell is because you believe the investment in that division can be used to make more money (for less). Getting rid of a profitable entity is usually greed based.

It's corporate-speak that means nothing. The same company "focused on it's core business" today will buy something unrelated sometime later and say it's "poised for growth in a growing market".

[–] Arsenal4ever@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

TIL IBM owned the weather app.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›