Technology

59308 readers

5507 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

349

IBM selling The Weather Channel and the rest of its weather business (www.cnbc.com)

submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

76 comments fedilink hide all child comments

IBM selling The Weather Channel and the rest of its weather business::IBM will sell The Weather Company to Francisco Partners, a tech-focused private equity firm, for an undisclosed sum, it announced Tuesday.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Please don't make Weather Underground shitty. It's the only weather website that gives accurate information around here.

[–] unwillingsomnambulist@midwest.social 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hate to tell you this, but it’s been shitty since the NEXRAD feeds broke and they never bothered to fix ‘em.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe for you, but all the other weather websites I've tried are wrong. Even DarkSky was wrong half the time. It said sunny skies when we were in the middle of a blizzard once. I don't know, maybe there's something weird about where I am.

[–] unwillingsomnambulist@midwest.social 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I had a similar experience with Dark Sky, but Weather Underground was always great. The weird part of it is that I’m near Chicago, where the NWS office got trashed for their awful handling of the forecast and response to the storms that led to the Plainfield F5 in 1990 - bad radar was often cited as a reason for that response, so NEXRAD especially has been key to NWS’s improvement here.

It’s www.weather.gov/lot for me now.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Oh wow, weather.gov looks really nice these days. It used to be bare bones. I may use it from now on, thanks!

Edit: The only thing I don't like is I can't see where it has the current heat index.

[–] unwillingsomnambulist@midwest.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not sure if this is the case for other regions, but it's right here for me:

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, not there for me. Still worth using overall though.

[–] Elegast@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If only their UI wasn't so trash I'd only ever use weather.gov

[–] unwillingsomnambulist@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah it's pretty bare-bones. Pretty much the only site I am aware of that still uses image maps. The other one I like is the College of DuPage Meteorology site, though that gets even more archaic in some places: https://weather.cod.edu/

[–] doubletwist@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They've been shitty since TWC bought them. Maybe a little before when they killed their old web interface which was informative and fast and replaced it with a new design that was difficult to read information, and worst of all, slow as fuck. That's about when I stopped subscribing.

[–] const_void@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

worst of all, slow as fuck.

So true. Waiting 30 seconds to see the temperature is ridiculous.

[–] over_clox@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It takes all of 2 seconds to open the door. Guess what? The temperature is hot.

[–] const_void@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Because it's so easy to crack the door when you're 20 stories up...